- Open Access
The effects of perinatal testosterone exposure on the DNA methylome of the mouse brain are late-emerging
- Negar M Ghahramani†1, 2,
- Tuck C Ngun†1, 2,
- Pao-Yang Chen3,
- Yuan Tian4,
- Sangitha Krishnan1, 2,
- Stephanie Muir1, 2,
- Liudmilla Rubbi5,
- Arthur P Arnold2, 6,
- Geert J de Vries7,
- Nancy G Forger7,
- Matteo Pellegrini5 and
- Eric Vilain1, 2, 8Email author
© Ghahramani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Received: 8 April 2014
- Accepted: 22 May 2014
- Published: 13 June 2014
The biological basis for sex differences in brain function and disease susceptibility is poorly understood. Examining the role of gonadal hormones in brain sexual differentiation may provide important information about sex differences in neural health and development. Permanent masculinization of brain structure, function, and disease is induced by testosterone prenatally in males, but the possible mediation of these effects by long-term changes in the epigenome is poorly understood.
We investigated the organizational effects of testosterone on the DNA methylome and transcriptome in two sexually dimorphic forebrain regions—the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis/preoptic area and the striatum. To study the contribution of testosterone to both the establishment and persistence of sex differences in DNA methylation, we performed genome-wide surveys in male, female, and female mice given testosterone on the day of birth. Methylation was assessed during the perinatal window for testosterone's organizational effects and in adulthood.
The short-term effect of testosterone exposure was relatively modest. However, in adult animals the number of genes whose methylation was altered had increased by 20-fold. Furthermore, we found that in adulthood, methylation at a substantial number of sexually dimorphic CpG sites was masculinized in response to neonatal testosterone exposure. Consistent with this, testosterone's effect on gene expression in the striatum was more apparent in adulthood.
Taken together, our data imply that the organizational effects of testosterone on the brain methylome and transcriptome are dramatic and late-emerging. Our findings offer important insights into the long-term molecular effects of early-life hormonal exposure.
- Brain sexual differentiation
- Epigenetic modifications
- DNA methylation
- Organizational effects
The biological basis for sex differences in brain function and disease susceptibility is poorly understood. Numerous neurological disorders (e.g., autism, schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease) show sexual dimorphism in prevalence [1–3], and sex-specific biological factors are likely to be major contributors. Sex steroid hormones such as testosterone play a major role in sexually dimorphic brain development [4, 5]. Exposure of neural tissue to testosterone and estradiol, its aromatized form, during the perinatal window (‘the sensitive period’), leads to long lasting and irreversible masculinization of the brain . The fundamental molecular mechanisms underlying the hormonal regulation of brain sexual differentiation remain understudied.
Emerging evidence implicates DNA methylation as an important player in a variety of critical nervous system functions [7–9]. 5-Methylcytosine (5-mC) marks at CpG islands in gene promoters are known to affect gene transcription , modulate X inactivation and imprinting, and regulate heterochromatin . There is also increasing evidence of the importance of non-CpG methylation in neural development [12, 13]. Recent studies have identified CpGs that show sex-specific methylation that can be modified by sex steroids during the sensitive period. Estradiol can alter the methylation status of CpG sites on the promoters of the estrogen and progesterone receptor genes [14, 15]. However, the methylation status of only a limited number of CpG sites at candidate genes has been studied. A larger-scale study of the methylome could elucidate the role of epigenetic modifications in hormone-induced brain sexual differentiation.
We hypothesized that long-term effects of gonadal steroid hormones on brain development involve epigenetic modifications. We investigated the scope and properties of testosterone's organizational effects on neural DNA methylation and gene expression by comparing the methylome and transcriptome in male (XY), female (XX), and female mice that received testosterone on the day of birth (XX + T). Genome-wide methylation and expression profiling were carried out for two sexually dimorphic brain regions: the striatum and the combined bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and preoptic area (BNST/POA). These regions were chosen as both are responsive to gonadal hormones and show strong sexual dimorphisms. The BNST/POA is subject to long-lasting irreversible neuroanatomical changes due to perinatal testosterone exposure and has been implicated in the regulation of male copulatory behavior, gonadotropin release, and stress modulation . The striatum is involved in dopaminergic function and reward and shows several key sex differences, many of which are caused by gonadal hormones. Numerous aspects of dopamine metabolism are influenced by estrogen [17–20]. Furthermore, we have previously shown that Sry (the Y-linked male sex determination gene) enhanced striatum dopamine release and regulated sensorimotor functions of dopaminergic neurons . To examine the long-term molecular effects of organizational testosterone, we examined two different time points: postnatal day (PN) 4, which is during the sensitive period, and adulthood (PN60).
We show that neonatal testosterone treatment of females induces a shift in the methylome from a female-typical to a more male-typical pattern. Contrary to our expectations, the shift toward the male pattern is only observed during adulthood. Organizational testosterone also affects the CpG methylation status of many more genes at PN60 than at PN4. Consistent with the CpG methylation analysis, testosterone's effects on gene expression in the striatum were more apparent in adulthood. Our data demonstrate that the organizational effects of testosterone on the brain methylome and transcriptome are dramatic and late-emerging. They suggest an important role for CpG methylation in brain sexual organization.
Animals and neonatal injections
This study was approved by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Committee on Animal Research and was performed in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. C57BL/6 J female and male mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and housed at the UCLA Animal Care Facility. Animals were maintained at 20°C with a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle, provided ad libitum with food and water, and allowed to acclimate for 1 week before initiation of experiments. Female mice were mated and once pregnant, cages were checked daily for pups.
On the day of birth, PN0, male pups (referred to as XY throughout this paper) were treated subcutaneously with 15 μl of peanut oil vehicle; female pups were either treated subcutaneously with 15 μl oil (XX) or with 100 μg testosterone propionate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 15 μl oil (XX + T). Half of the mice in each group were sacrificed at PN4 during the perinatal sensitive period for sexual differentiation and just prior to the sexually dimorphic cell death known to be important for differentiation of the POA and BNST [22, 23]. The remaining mice in each group were sacrificed in early adulthood, on PN60. In order to eliminate group differences in pubertal or adult gonadal hormone exposure, mice euthanized on PN60 were gonadectomized at PN21 (i.e., prior to puberty) and implanted with a 5-mm-long Silastic capsule (inner diameter, 1.57 mm; outer diameter, 2.41 mm) filled with testosterone at around the time of puberty (PN45). This design allows us to attribute any differences between XX and XX + T mice only to the neonatal hormone exposure. Post-weaning, animals belonging to the same litter were housed in the same cage (maximum of three animals per cage), although males and females were separated. As all pups in a litter received the same treatment (either T or vehicle), all adult animals housed in the same cage had undergone the same hormonal manipulations.
We had a total of 12 experimental groups: XX, XY, and XX + T tissue from two ages and two distinct brain regions. Each experimental group had two biological replicates, each comprising a pool of tissue from three animals, making for a total of 24 samples.
At PN4 or PN60, whole brain was rapidly removed from the skull and brain regions of interest were dissected under a microscope on an ice-cold slide. After removal of the dura mater, two cuts through the brain along the coronal plane were made. The first was at the midpoint of the optic chiasm (0.14 mm anterior to bregma) and the second was where the optic tract enters the brain (0.58 mm posterior to bregma). The resulting slab of tissue was then placed posterior side down. The BNST/POA was defined as the region ventral to the lateral ventricle and bounded laterally by the medial edge of the internal capsule. The striatum was defined as the tissue between the external capsule and the anterior commissure, bounded laterally by the cortex and medially by the internal capsule. After dissection, the tissue was immediately placed on dry ice and stored at −80°C until it was processed for downstream experiments.
Measurement of levator ani and bulbocavernosus muscles
The dose of testosterone used in this study has previously been shown to completely masculinize BNST volume and cell number . To confirm the efficacy of hormone treatments here, we randomly selected a subset of the XX (N = 4) and XX + T (N = 5) mice on PN4 and examined the size of the androgen-sensitive levator ani and bulbocavernosus muscles. The perineums were processed as described previously , and the maximal cross-sectional area of the levator ani was determined by tracing around the muscle using StereoInvestigator (MBF Biosciences, Williston, VT, USA) software.
Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing library construction
Genomic DNA from mouse brains was extracted for making reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) libraries following the standard RRBS protocol . The genome was digested with the MspI enzyme, a methylation-insensitive restriction enzyme. These MspI-digested samples were ligated with Illumina adaptors (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and size-selected. Fragments from 100 to 200 bases were selected as these are enriched for CpG-rich regions, such as CpG islands, promoter regions, and enhancer elements. In total we selected 500 K distinct fragments for sequencing. These fragments were denatured and treated with sodium bisulfite to reveal their methylation status (CpGenome Universal DNA Modification Kit, Cat. No. S7820, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Libraries were then polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified with MyTaqHS (BIO-25047, Bioline, Taunton, MA, USA) and sequenced using the Solexa sequencing technology (Illumina Hiseq 2000 sequencers). The reads were aligned to the reference genome (mouse mm9) using the modified bisulfite aligner, BS Seeker . To generate genome-wide DNA methylation profiles, we calculated the methylation level for each covered cytosine on the genome. As bisulfite treatment converted unmethylated cytosines (Cs) to thymines (Ts), we estimated the methylation level at each cytosine by #C/(#C + #T), where #C is the number of methylated reads and #T is the number of unmethylated reads. This number represents the average methylation level at that particular site across the cell population tested. In this study we only included cytosines that were covered by at least four reads for the analysis.
Identifying differentially methylated regions and differentially methylated genes
We first searched for differentially methylated regions (DMRs) that showed significant differential methylation. We grouped nearby cytosine sites into units called fragments. In each pairwise comparison, a Student's t test was performed at each site to quantify the difference between the groups at that site. This generated a t-score that represented the difference between the groups (the larger the t-scores, the more different the methylation levels in that pairwise comparison). In order to get an accurate measurement of these differences after the sites were combined into fragments, the t-scores of all sites in that fragment are averaged to produce a z-score. To qualify as DMRs, the fragment had to (1) show a difference of ≥10% in mean methylation level between the two groups being compared, (2) have at least three cytosines for which methylation levels were observed in all relevant samples, and (3) have a z-score below a threshold relevant to that comparison. The selection of the z-score threshold was based on the false discovery rate estimated by comparing the real data to simulated methylomes as the control for false discovery rate (FDR) computation (full procedure below). These DMRs were then associated with a gene if there was a transcription start site within 5 kb of them or if they overlapped with any known genes to identify differentially methylated genes. We used GeneVenn (http://genevenn.sourceforge.net/, ) to determine overlap between gene sets.
Estimating false discovery rate
To assess the false discovery rate for our DMRs, we constructed simulated methylomes, with the same read coverage per site as the real samples. For each CG site in each simulated sample, we then simulated the reads (C if methylated or T if unmethylated) based on the average methylation level (Pm) from all real samples at this CG site. The number of methylated reads (Cs) at a site of coverage n is a random sample from the binomial distribution B(n, Pm). We repeated our simulation of reads throughout the genome for all samples. The resulting samples had the same average methylation levels as the real sample. Since the reads were simulated from the binomial distribution with the same average methylation levels as in the real samples, the differences in methylation patterns across genes, repeats, promoters, etc. were preserved. The simulated data has the same coverage as the real samples so the statistical power is not affected. The simulated methylomes should have no difference in methylation levels between the two comparison groups (i.e., no DMRs), since they are all selected using the same methylation frequency. Any DMRs (and the DMR-associated genes) identified from these simulated samples are thus considered false positives. Then, for each comparison we repeated the whole procedure to detect the DMR on simulated samples: we first performed t tests on individual sites and then summarized the t-scores per fragment with a z-score. For each z-score threshold, we computed the numbers of DMRs that were found in the simulated data to those found in the real data. We used the ratio of these to compute the FDR. We chose a z-score threshold that resulted in a false discovery rate less than 10% in all comparisons.
Traditional (Sanger) bisulfite sequencing
Strand-specific primers were designed for the bisulfite-converted genome of the region of interest and synthesized by Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). For Micall1 (target region, chr15:78965961–78966079; negative strand, mm9), the forward primer was ATTTTTGTTATTGGGAAGGATAAGG and the reverse primer was AAACCCCAACCATACATAATCTCTA. The cycling conditions were 1 cycle at 95°C for 2 min; 35 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 58°C for 1 min, and 60°C for 1 min; and 1 cycle at 60°C for 15 min. For Fzd9 (target region, chr5:135725414–135725524; negative strand, mm9), the forward primer was TGAATTGATTGGGTTTTGTTATGTA and the reverse primer was ACTAATAATACCCACCACCAAAAAC. The cycling conditions were 95°C for 2 min; 40 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, and 60°C for 2 min; 1 cycle at 60°C for 15 min. The samples used for traditional bisulfite sequencing (n = 2–3 per experimental group) were not used in the RRBS experiments although they were generated at the same time. One microgram for each sample was bisulfite-treated and purified (CpGenome Universal DNA Modification Kit, Cat. No. S7820, Millipore). Forty nanograms of bisulfite-converted DNA was used in each PCR (MyTaqHS, BIO-25047, Bioline). After gel purification, amplicons were cloned into pCR4-TOPO TA vectors (TOPO TA Cloning Kit for Sequencing, K4575-01SC, Life Technologies). Fifteen to twenty colonies were sent for Sanger sequencing using the M13R primer (Laragen Inc., Culver City, CA, USA).
Heat maps of methylation levels in differentially methylated regions
A union set of DMRs was collected from all pairwise comparisons (all ages, sex, and regions). Among them, we selected 4,086 DMRs that were extremely differentially methylated (longer than 50 bp, delta methylation ≥25%, and –z-score ≥3.5). These are potentially regions that are susceptible to methylation changes. The average methylation levels in all XX, XX + T, and XY groups were plotted in heat maps with hierarchical clustering of the DMRs.
Gene ontology using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis
Functional analysis of statistically significant CpG methylation changes was performed with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA; Ingenuity Systems, http://www.ingenuity.com). Ingenuity functional analysis identified networks, canonical signaling pathways, and biological functions and/or diseases that were most significantly affected by testosterone and age. For all analyses, datasets containing gene identifiers and corresponding delta methylation values were uploaded into IPA. The genes were overlaid onto a global molecular network developed from information in the Ingenuity Pathway Knowledge Base. Networks of these focus genes were then algorithmically generated based on their connectivity. To identify biological functions and diseases that were enriched in the different datasets, genes were associated with biological functions and/or diseases in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base. Right‒tailed Fisher's exact test was used to calculate a p value determining the probability that each biological function and/or disease assigned to that dataset was due to chance alone. In this method, the p value for a given process is calculated by investigating (1) the number of participating genes in that process and (2) the total number of genes known to be related to that process in the selected reference set. The more genes involved, the more significant the p value. Canonical pathways analysis identified the pathways from the IPA library of pathways that were most significant to the dataset. The significance of the association between the dataset and the canonical pathway was measured in two ways: (1) a ratio of the number of molecules from the dataset that map to the pathway divided by the total number of molecules that map to the canonical pathway was determined and displayed in the tables that follow; (2) Fisher's exact test was used to calculate a p value determining the probability that the association between the genes in the dataset and the canonical pathway was explained by chance alone.
Samples were collected at the time of euthanasia. In all cases, blood was obtained from the carotid artery following decapitation. Blood samples were then processed to isolate serum and stored at −20°C until assays for testosterone were performed. Testosterone assays using radioimmunoassay were performed by Ligand Assay and Analysis Core at the University of Virginia Center for Research in Reproduction (supported by NICHD (SCCPIR) Grant U54-HD28934). Testosterone measurements were performed in singlet reactions using Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics testosterone RIA (Siemens Healthcare, Malvern, PA, USA) with a reportable range of 47.3–170.5 ng/L. There were no significant differences in the measured testosterone levels between our experimental groups using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance test (H = 3.8, 2 df, p = 0.15).
Processing for gene expression analysis
Total RNA samples were derived from five pools of three animals using AllPrep DNA/RNA Micro Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. This kit enabled simultaneous purification of genomic DNA and total RNA from all tissues. Samples were prepared from the same tissue samples that were used to create the RRBS libraries. RNA was quantified using a Ribogreen fluorescent assay (Life Technologies) and normalized to 10 ng/μl prior to amplification. Amplified and labeled cRNA was produced using the Illumina specific Ambion TotalPrep kit (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). First and second strand cDNA were produced using the Ambion kit and purified using a robotic-assisted magnetic capture step. Biotinylated cRNA was produced from the cDNA template in a reverse transcription reaction. Typical yields were in excess of 1.5 μg. After a second Ribogreen quant and normalization step, amplified and labeled cRNA was hybridized overnight at 58°C to MouseRef-8 v1.1 BeadChip expression arrays from Illumina. To minimize array-to-array variability, a cRNA sample from each of the experimental groups was hybridized to each of the beadchips (n = 5/group) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The MouseRef-8 v1.1 beadchip contains over 24,000 well-annotated RefSeq transcripts and allows eight samples to be interrogated in parallel. Hybridization was followed by washing, blocking, staining, and drying on the Little Dipper processor (Agilent Technologies, Sta. Clara, CA, USA). Array chips were scanned on either the BeadArray reader or the iScan reader (Illumina).
Microarray data analysis of gene expression
cDNA microarray data analysis was performed using the R software and Bioconductor packages. The raw intensity data were first log2 transformed and then the outlier samples were detected based on the average inter-sample correlations. Three samples with average inter-sample correlations larger than two standard deviations (SDs) from the mean across all samples were removed from follow-up analysis. Then the samples were normalized by quantile normalization. Probes were considered robustly expressed if the detection p value was <0.05 in at least 20 samples (the total number of samples for every genetic/treatment group) in the dataset. After the data quality controls, 57 samples with 13,776 probes were retained for differential expression analysis. Hierarchical clustering analysis using one minus inter-array correlation measures was further performed to assess the sample clustering patterns.
Differential expression analysis was conducted using the R limma package , and unless otherwise specified, the significance threshold was Benjamini-Hochberg (BH)-adjusted p value <0.05. Limma uses linear models to robustly assess the differential expression of genes. Histograms of p values were plotted to show if there was a significant differential expression signal genome-wide. To identify the genes that differed by age in the different groups/brain regions, the factorial design was applied using limma linear models. The genes were identified as showing significant dynamic changes with age if their p values associated with the interaction term between the factors of group and age were less than 0.005.
Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
Reverse transcription was performed using the Tetro cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline, catalog no. BIO-65043) with 1 μg of total RNA as template. The RNA samples used for validation were from the original microarray samples contingent on availability (n = 3–4 per genotype). The sequences of PCR primers are as follows: for Alcam, forward primer 5′-CGA ACC CTG CCT GTG TCA TGC ACA ATA-3′ and reverse primer 5′-TAT CGT CTG CCT CAT CGT GCT CTG GAA T-3′; for Gapdh, forward primer 5′-TGC CGC CTG GAG AAA CC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CCC TCA GAT GCC TGC TTC AC-3′; for Gatad1, forward primer 5′-GAA ATT CAC AGA AGG TCG GC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-AAT ATA CTC CCT TGT AGA AGA TTG A-3′; for Utx, forward primer 5′-CCA ATC CCC GCA GAG CTT ACC T-3′ and reverse primer 5′-TTG CTC GGA GCT GTT CCA AGT G-3′. All primers used spanned at least one intron. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used for normalization of gene expression between samples. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reactions (qRT-PCRs) were carried out in duplicate utilizing the Sybr Green-based SensiFAST™ SYBR & Fluorescein Kit (Bioline, catalog no. BIO-96005). The thermocycling parameters for all reactions were 1 cycle at 95°C for 2 min, 40 cycles at 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 10 s, and 72°C for 10 s. We used the standard curve method to determine relative expression and assessed significance using the Student's t test (α = 0.05). Data are expressed as fold change where the expression level in the XX group has been set to 1.
The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE50218 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE50218).
The expression data generated for this study have been submitted to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE49986.
Sex effects on genome-wide methylation data
To examine sex-specific and hormone-induced changes in brain DNA methylation, we compared genome-wide maps of DNA methylation in adult mouse striatum and BNST/POA between XX and XY mice generated using RRBS. All animals were gonadectomized and provided with identical hormone replacement prior to sacrifice so that any differences seen could not be due to differences in circulating hormones at the time of sacrifice (see ‘Methods’). We had a total of 12 experimental groups: XX, XY, and XX + T tissue from two ages and two distinct brain regions. Each experimental group had two biological replicates, each comprising a pool of tissue from three animals, making for a total of 24 samples. Forty-six percent of our sequencing reads uniquely mapped back to the mouse genome, which resulted in an average sequencing depth of 58× at each CpG. We assayed approximately 1.39 million CpGs in 125 million uniquely mapped reads in each sample (Additional file 1: Table S1). The majority of samples had >1 million distinct CpGs covered with a minimum of 4× coverage. CpG sites that were not present in all comparison groups were excluded from further analysis.
We then focused our analysis on CpG methylation. Overall, the CpG methylation profiles of adult XX and XY striatum and BNST/POA were highly similar across all chromosomes (Pearson coefficient, 0.99) (Figure 1d,e), indicating that the genomic profiles of 5-mC are highly reproducible. Despite this overall similarity, hierarchical clustering clearly identified sex- and testosterone-driven (Figure 1f,g,h,i) methylation differences. Testosterone-driven differences (different in XX vs. XX + T) were more abundant on autosomes (Figure 1f,g). In many regions showing these differences, XX + T CpG methylation patterns resemble those of XY. On the other hand, sex-specific differences (XX vs. XY) were clearest on the X chromosome, as expected, given the involvement of CpG methylation in the process of X inactivation and XX + T tended to resemble XX (Figure 1h,i).
Testosterone-induced modification of brain CpG methylation
We found that neonatal testosterone exposure altered the methylation status of a substantial number of genomic fragments. These fragments mapped to a relatively small number of genes at PN4 (68 genes in the striatum and 45 genes in the BNST/POA) (Figure 3b). However, by day 60 of life, a much larger number of genes showed methylation changes in response to neonatal testosterone (1,377 and 740 genes differed in methylation status in testosterone-treated PN60 females relative to control PN60 females in striatum and BNST/POA, respectively) (Figure 3b; Additional file 3: Table S3). A substantial fraction of these genes displayed increased 5-mC in response to testosterone. In the striatum, 51/68 (75.00%) genes at PN4 and 1,324/1,377 (96.15%) genes at PN60 showed greater methylation in XX + T relative to XX mice (Figure 3c). Similarly, in the BNST/POA 38/45 (84.44%) genes at PN4 and 705/740 (95.27%) genes at PN60 also showed greater methylation in female mice treated with testosterone (Figure 3c; Additional file 3: Table S3).
Of the testosterone-affected genes, 654/1,377 (47.49%) and 265/740 (35.81%) in the striatum and BNST/POA, respectively, also exhibited male vs. female differences in their methylation patterns at PN60 (Figure 3d,e; p value = 1.00E − 111, hypergeometric test; fold enrichment over chance, 4.55 (striatum), 6.07 (BNST/POA); Additional file 4: Table S4). There are several possible reasons why many of the genes whose methylation status was changed by testosterone did not show sex differences: (1) a lack of statistical power such that some differences are not confirmed in two different comparisons, (2) a pharmacological effect of the relatively high dose of testosterone used here, or (3) testosterone effects found in XX but not normally in XY mice. For some dependent measures, the presence of a Y chromosome has effects opposite to that of testosterone . In the current context, this means that some effects of early exposure to androgens on CpG methylation in males may be masked by Y chromosome factors.
To validate our RRBS findings, we performed traditional (Sanger) bisulfite sequencing. We chose one testosterone-affected locus from each brain region for validation. For the striatum, we chose Micall1 (higher methylation in XX than XX + T). For the BNST/POA, we chose Fzd9 (higher methylation in XX + T than XX). The results from traditional bisulfite sequencing were in agreement with the RRBS data (Additional file 5: Figure S1).
Brain region specificity of testosterone's effects
Next, we compared the testosterone-affected genes in the striatum to those in the BNST/POA. As with our identification of dual region sex-specific genes, only genes where testosterone-affected methylation at the same chromosomal location and in the same direction were considered. At PN4, only two genes (Sorcs2 and Lonrf3) were affected by testosterone in both the striatum and the BNST/POA (Figure 3f). At PN60, this number rose to 92, (neither Sorc2 nor Lonrf3 were present in this list) (Figure 3g). Unlike the list of PN60 dual region sex-specific genes, the X chromosome was not substantially over-represented in this comparison (16 of the 92 dual region testosterone-affected genes were X-linked). This result may be expected since in both XX and XX + T animals, one X chromosome is expected to undergo inactivation and the same genes are inactivated across tissues . These data indicate that testosterone's effects are more region-specific than that of sex (as there are only 92 dual region testosterone-affected genes compared to 362 sex-specific ones) and that genetic sex has a much stronger effect on methylation of X-linked genes, whether they were subject to or escaped X inactivation (compare Figure 2c to 3g).
In both the striatum and BNST/POA, the sexually dimorphic gene sets showed a greater proportion of X-linked genes compared to the testosterone-affected gene sets (PN60 striatum, 26.6% vs. 6.1%; PN60 BNST/POA, 41.5% vs. 9.7%). When we consider just inactivation escapees, the results are largely similar to those from the whole set. At both ages and in both brain regions, we detected 5 of 14 known X inactivation escapees as being sexually dimorphic in their methylation (1810030O07Rik, 6720401G13Rik, Bgn, Mid1, Shroom4) [34, 35]. In contrast, only 1 of these 14 (striatum, Mid1; BNST/POA, 6720401G13Rik) were affected by testosterone and only at PN60. Thus, it appears that the effect of testosterone on X-linked genes is rather limited in both the striatum and BNST/POA.
Biological functions associated with differentially methylated genes in XX vs. XX + T mice determined by IPA
Number of genes
Number of genes
Nervous system development and function
Morphology of nervous system
1.02E − 08
3.91E − 06
Development of central nervous system
6.63E − 08
4.71E − 08
Morphology of nervous tissue
7.88E − 06
7.75E − 05
1.05E − 05
1.03E − 07
Outgrowth of neurites
4.68E − 05
2.19E − 03
4.69E − 05
1.67E − 02
1.48E − 04
1.18E − 04
Excitatory postsynaptic potential
1.51E − 04
5.55E − 03
Growth of neurites
1.75E − 04
5.21E − 03
Morphology of neurites
7.77E − 04
1.99E − 04
Morphology of dendritic spines
7.78E − 04
7.85E − 04
Guidance of axons
9.29E − 04
1.60E − 05
Outgrowth of axons
9.56E − 04
9.82E − 03
6.32E − 05
NMDA-mediated synaptic current
2.93E − 04
Action potential of cells
3.58E − 04
1.30E − 03
Quantity of neurons
3.81E − 05
Cell viability of neurons
1.93E − 02
Cellular assembly and organization
Organization of cytoskeleton
1.86E − 07
1.72E − 06
2.17E − 07
7.64E − 06
Skeletal and muscular system development and function
Development of muscle
2.55E − 06
Cell death and survival
7.68E − 06
1.70E − 03
Cellular growth and proliferation
Proliferation of neuronal cells
1.25E − 02
3.33E − 03
2.81E − 04
2.59E − 03
Examples of top ‘neurological disease’ functional categories that were significantly enriched in striatal testosterone-influenced genes
Number of genes
1.03E − 04
Congenital anomaly of brain
6.81E − 04
3.36E − 03
3.43E − 03
3.47E − 03
3.90E − 03
Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome
4.66E − 03
5.08E − 03
5.35E − 03
6.76E − 03
6.89E − 03
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
7.00E − 03
9.03E − 03
9.64E − 03
1.33E − 02
Degeneration of brain
1.34E − 02
We next examined the genomic features of fragments identified by RRBS as differing between XX and XX + T at PN60. In both brain regions, we found an underrepresentation of methylation changes not only in promoters (defined as ±500 bp relative to the transcription start site) but also in CpG islands. Gene-body methylation (the entire gene from the transcription start site to the end of the transcript) contributed substantially to testosterone-altered CpGs. CpGs located within introns were most susceptible to changes by testosterone (p value <1.00E − 94; Fisher's exact test). Testosterone-modified CpGs were also over-represented in exonic regions (p value <1.00E − 17; Fisher's exact test). These results are consistent with recent reports which suggest that in mammals, cell type-specific CpG methylation-related gene regulation mostly occurs at alternative promoters within gene bodies . When we compared the methylation patterns of three subclasses of repetitive elements—short interspersed elements (SINEs), long interspersed elements (LINEs), and simple repeat regions—in our testosterone dataset, we detected a depletion of testosterone-affected CpG sites in LINEs (p value <1.00E − 14; Fisher's exact test).
Identification of stably differentially methylated genes
Testosterone-driven methylation changes at several genes are maintained into adulthood
Δ Me at PN4
Fragment coordinate at PN4
Δ Me at PN60
Fragment coordinate at PN60
Associated genomic features
Testosterone-induced masculinization of methylation
We next assessed whether testosterone induces a broad shift in CpG methylation in the brains of XX + T mice from a female-typical to a more male-typical pattern. We first identified CpG sites that were sexually dimorphic and defined them as those that displayed a significant difference in methylation levels between control females and control males (p value ≤0.05 measured by the Student's t test; FDR approximately 7% to 13%). This analysis identified about 12,000–20,000 sites in each brain region. For each site, we arbitrarily defined the male methylation level as 0 and the female level as 100. The XX + T methylation levels at these same sites were normalized to this scale and graphed on a continuum between 0 and 100.
To identify genes with sex-specific expression patterns and those in which expression is regulated by testosterone, we tested each of the possible pairwise comparisons (XX vs. XY, XX vs. XX + T, XX + T vs. XY) in different ages and brain regions. Significant differential expression signals were only observed for (1) XX vs. XY comparison at PN4 in BNST/POA (n = 5 per group, Benjamini-Hochberg (BH)-adjusted p value (FDR) <0.05, 21 genes) and (2) XX vs. XX + T at PN60 in the striatum (n = 5 per group, BH-adjusted p value (FDR) <0.05, 99 genes) (Figure 5b,c). qRT-PCR was performed to validate the microarray results. All genes detected as significantly different in the BNST/POA XX vs. XY PN4 microarray showed significant differences by PCR in the expected direction (Additional file 5: Figure S2). We did not have the biological material to validate the striatal XX vs. XX + T PN60 microarray.
None of the genes in the striatal PN4 XX vs. XX + T comparison survived BH adjustment. However, by day 60 of life, 99 genes demonstrated statistically significant testosterone-dependent expression changes (BH-adjusted p value (FDR) <0.05). This finding was consistent with the trend observed in the methylation data. In addition, the gene expression differences associated with testosterone treatment were less pronounced in the BNST/POA than in the striatum in adulthood (Additional file 8: Table S7). IPA analysis of differentially expressed genes in XX vs. XX + T PN60 striatum showed enrichment of gene categories such as formation of actin filaments, formation of neurites, myelination of neurites, long-term potentiation, and abnormal morphology of dopaminergic neurons (Additional file 9: Table S8).
Genes that show testosterone-driven changes in both CpG methylation and gene expression
Expression difference p value
Δ Me at PN60
9.66E − 05
3.63E − 04
8.18E − 05
2.41E − 04
2.08E − 04
3.80E − 04
4.11E − 05
3.09E − 04
2.75E − 04
1.26E − 04
Overall, we identified genes and pathways that are subject to regulation by testosterone at the mRNA level. Our data suggest that testosterone regulates gene transcription in a highly context-dependent manner (e.g., the effect of testosterone appeared to be stronger in the striatum). Finally, although some level of correlation was observed between methylation and expression changes, the genes identified by these two analyses were largely non-overlapping. The ability of methylation differences to predict expression changes at the single gene level was limited.
Our study shows that the organizational effect of testosterone on the brain is late-emerging and markedly modifies the epigenetic CpG methylation landscape of the brain. We have established the first genome-wide and quantitative map of testosterone-induced CpG methylation changes in two sexually dimorphic brain regions. We show that the majority of methylation changes caused by testosterone are not established in the first few days following the initial exposure to testosterone. Instead, testosterone's effects are most obvious in adulthood where it has masculinized a large number of sexually dimorphic CpG sites, which show increased methylation in XX + T and XY compared to XX. These results run counter to our initial prediction that sex differences in methylation are established during early development, most of which remain stable over time. Since the organizational effects of testosterone appear much later in life, organization by testosterone may occur via early programming on relatively few genes. This small initial effect is what sets up the brain to respond in a particular fashion to other events during postnatal development. Since all animals in the study were gonadectomized before puberty and provided with identical hormone replacement prior to sacrifice, differences seen during adulthood likely reflect programming by perinatal testosterone. However, the full manifestation of these differences may require the presence of testosterone in adulthood.
All animals were given T implants at PN45 to capture the full effect of perinatal organization. Previous studies had shown that the full manifestation of some organizational effects requires activational hormonal effects (in other words, adult levels of circulating hormone levels). For instance, female rats given testosterone perinatally will not show increased mounting behavior unless they are also given a dose of testosterone in adulthood . Therefore, we hypothesized that the effects of perinatal T on the methylome would not fully manifest themselves unless adult circulating hormonal levels were also present. If no hormone replacement had taken place, it is likely that we would have found fewer differences between XX and XX + T. It is also likely that the XX + T animals would have experienced less masculinization of their methylomes.
Another unexpected finding with respect to the testosterone effects is that the shift toward a male-like pattern of CpG methylation in XX + T mice was more pronounced in the striatum than in the BNST/POA. This was surprising since the BNST/POA displays some of the most prominent anatomical and neurochemical sex differences in the brain that result from organization by gonadal hormones, whereas sex differences in the striatum are comparatively modest in terms of neuroanatomy. Our data therefore show that neuroanatomical and neurochemical markers of sex differences may not fully reflect the sensitivity of a brain region to gonadal hormones.
We also identified sets of testosterone-regulated loci that clearly maintained differences in 5-mC from PN4 to PN60 in both the striatum and BNST/POA, although these were a small minority. The overwhelming majority of testosterone-affected loci showed dynamic CpG methylation patterns. While this is not in agreement with the classic view of DNA methylation as a permanent epigenetic mark, our data are consistent with the findings of several recent studies demonstrating developmental or experience-dependent regulation of 5-mC in the mammalian brain [39–43]. For example, Schwarz et al. have shown that sex differences in methylation patterns at the Esr1, Esr2, and Pr promoters are dynamic across the life span . Although, we did not identify the methylation patterns of Esr1, Esr2, and Pr promoters as significantly influenced by sex or testosterone exposure, we were not surprised given the different species used in each study (mice in our study and rats in Schwarz et al.), the difference in tissue examined (both the BNST and POA here vs. just the POA in Schwarz et al.), and the fact that we required our differentially methylated fragments to show consistent methylation changes in several adjacent CpG sites (Schwarz et al. considered each CpG site on its own).
When we examined the characteristics of the genes associated with the testosterone-modified CpGs, we found a significant enrichment of genes that are expressed in the brain, particularly those involved in synaptic function. This suggests that the effect of the neonatal testosterone is not random and that testosterone specifically alters the methylation of neural-related genes. Furthermore, the effects of testosterone (particularly on X-linked genes) appear to be brain region-specific. Interestingly, among the genes that were differentially methylated in the striatum due to testosterone, a substantial number encoded signaling components associated with increased or decreased risk of Parkinson's disease. We found that these genes overlapped with genes that show strong sex differences in expression in dopaminergic neurons from Parkinson's disease patients .
In the BNST/POA, sexually differentiated rates of apoptosis (male < female) driven by testosterone exposure is one of the major events leading to the volumetric sex differences in this region during the sensitive period [22, 45]. Consistent with this, we found genes involved in apoptosis in the testosterone-affected dataset at both PN4 and PN60. Perhaps most intriguing, we had genes related to the proliferation of neuronal cells in our dataset. Recent evidence has shown that the maintenance of sexual dimorphism resulting from the organizational effects of testosterone may require reinforcement in the form of pubertal hormones [36, 46, 47]. At least some of this reinforcement may take the form of sexually differentiated cell addition in several sexually dimorphic brain regions including the POA [36, 48, 49].
In studying the genome-wide methylation profiles of the striatum and BNST/POA both neonatally and later in life, we found that the methylation patterns of a large number of genes differed between the two sexes. Male-to-female comparisons displayed a marked enrichment of methylation on the X chromosome in females which could potentially be accounted for by X chromosome inactivation. Most of the X-linked genes that showed sex-specific differences in CpG methylation were found in both brain regions. This strongly suggests that the methylation differences we are detecting are real as the process of X inactivation affects X-linked genes similarly across tissues . We also identified widespread autosomal gene methylation differences between males and females. In contrast to the results from X-linked genes, the vast majority of autosomal genes that show sex differences were unique to either the striatum or the BNST/POA. Most of these genes were more methylated in males. One possible explanation is that the inactivated X chromosome could potentially act as a ‘heterochromatin sink,’ sequestering the factors required for gene silencing (DNA methyltransferases, etc.) at autosomal loci [50–52].
Most interestingly, concordant with the findings from our analysis of CpG methylation in the striatum, we found that testosterone's effect on gene expression was late-emerging. Finally, when we explored the extent to which changes in methylation levels contributed to gene expression differences, we found evidence for correlations between gene expression patterns and methylation profiles at some genes associated with DMRs, but in general, methylation differences did not predict differences in gene expression. This observation may not be surprising given that we worked with tissues that were relatively heterogeneous. In addition, many CpG methylation differences may not be associated with gene expression changes. Lyko et al. showed that there is a strong correlation between CpG methylation and splicing sites including those that have the potential to yield alternative exons . Therefore, an interesting avenue of research will be determining whether testosterone-induced methylation differences can specifically regulate splicing, rather than transcription.
There are several limitations to this study. This work represents a snapshot of the DNA methylation landscape at two ages, while the brain may display a vast array of epigenetic states as it passes through different stages of development. Longitudinal study designs examining DNA methylation at different life stages could provide a comprehensive picture of how the epigenome is modified over time. Because testosterone is known to alter the proportion of specific cell types comprising the BNST/POA and possibly the striatum, group differences in levels of methylation reported here could be the result of testosterone- or sex-specific regulation of the cell types in the dissected tissue, which in turn differ in their methylation of specific genes, or could reflect direct testosterone effects on the methylome of cell types common to the different groups. In addition, DNA methylation is associated with other epigenetic alterations, especially histone modifications and RNAi pathways. Studies of these other epigenetic changes are crucial to identifying common mechanisms underlying sex differences in epigenetic regulation. Finally, different brain regions are expected to display different epigenetic marks across their genomes, and epigenetic profiling across functionally discrete brain areas will be important in identifying tissue-specific sex differences.
Taken together, our results suggest that early testosterone exposure has broad effects on brain methylation patterns particularly during adulthood and that the emergence of sex differences in the brain may be a gradual process that is cemented over the organism's life. Our data provide a new perspective by showing that most sex differences in CpG methylation are dynamic and not the result of acute modifications in response to hormones. Clearly, additional studies of genome-scale methylation maps will be important to give us a full understanding of the long-lasting influences of early hormone exposure on DNA methylation dynamics of the brain.
This project was supported by the Training Program in the Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology (HD007228), a unit of the UCLA Brain Research Institute and NIH grants MH075046 to EV, GM095656-01A1 to MP, MH068482 to NGF, MH047538 to GJD, and NS043196 to APA. We would also like to thank Rebecca McClusky for her assistance with mouse gonadectomy surgeries, Tara TeSlaa for helping with the bioinformatics analysis, and Kajori Purkayastha for her aid with data analysis and manuscript preparation.
- Holden C: Sex and the suffering brain. Science 2005, 308: 1574.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baron-Cohen S, Knickmeyer RC, Belmonte MK: Sex differences in the brain: implications for explaining autism. Science 2005, 310: 819–823.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Swerdlow RH, Parker WD, Currie LJ, Bennett JP, Harrison MB, Trugman JM, Wooten GF: Gender ratio differences between Parkinson’s disease patients and their affected relatives. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2001, 7: 129–133.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnold AP, Gorski RA: Gonadal steroid induction of structural sex differences in the central nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci 1984, 7: 413–442.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Phoenix CH, Goy RW, Gerall AA, Young WC: Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig. Endocrinology 1959, 65: 369–382.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McCarthy MM: Estradiol and the developing brain. Physiol Rev 2008, 88: 91–124.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ma DK, Jang MH, Guo JU, Kitabatake Y, Chang ML, Pow-Anpongkul N, Flavell RA, Lu B, Ming GL, Song H: Neuronal activity-induced Gadd45b promotes epigenetic DNA demethylation and adult neurogenesis. Science 2009, 323: 1074–1077.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feng J, Zhou Y, Campbell SL, Le T, Li E, Sweatt JD, Silva AJ, Fan G: Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a maintain DNA methylation and regulate synaptic function in adult forebrain neurons. Nat Neurosci 2010, 13: 423–430.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- LaPlant Q, Vialou V, Covington HE 3rd, Dumitriu D, Feng J, Warren BL, Maze I, Dietz DM, Watts EL, Iniguez SD, Koo JW, Mouzon E, Rentha W, Hollis F, Wang H, Noonan MA, Ren Y, Eisch AJ, Bolanos CA, Kabbaj M, Xiao G, Neve RL, Hurd YL, Oosting RS, Fan G, Morrison JH, Nestler EJ: Dnmt3a regulates emotional behavior and spine plasticity in the nucleus accumbens. Nat Neurosci 2010, 13: 1137–1143.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki MM, Bird A: DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet 2008, 9: 465–476.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jaenisch R, Bird A: Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet 2003, 33(Suppl):245–254.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lister R, Mukamel EA, Nery JR, Urich M, Puddifoot CA, Johnson ND, Lucero J, Huang Y, Dwork AJ, Schultz MD, Yu M, Tonti-Filippini J, Heyn H, Hu S, Wu JC, Rao A, Esteller M, He C, Haghighi FG, Sejnowski TJ, Behrens MM, Ecker JR: Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development. Science 2013, 341: 1237905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo JU, Su Y, Shin JH, Shin J, Li H, Xie B, Zhong C, Hu S, Le T, Fan G, Zhu H, Chang Q, Gao Y, Ming G, Song H: Distribution, recognition and regulation of non-CpG methylation in the adult mammalian brain. Nat Neurosci 2014, 17: 215–222.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nugent BM, Schwarz JM, McCarthy MM: Hormonally mediated epigenetic changes to steroid receptors in the developing brain: implications for sexual differentiation. Horm Behav 2011, 59: 338–344.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwarz JM, Nugent BM, McCarthy MM: Developmental and hormone-induced epigenetic changes to estrogen and progesterone receptor genes in brain are dynamic across the life span. Endocrinology 2010, 151: 4871–4881.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ngun TC, Ghahramani N, Sánchez FJ, Bocklandt S, Vilain E: The genetics of sex differences in brain and behavior. Front Neuroendocrinol 2011, 32: 227–246.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez-Ruiz JJ, Hernandez ML, de Miguel R, Ramos JA: Nigrostriatal and mesolimbic dopaminergic activities were modified throughout the ovarian cycle of female rats. J Neural Transm Gen Sect 1991, 85: 223–229.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Davis CF, Davis BF, Halaris AE: Variations in the uptake of 3H-dopamine during the estrous cycle. Life Sci 1977, 20: 1319–1332.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morissette M, Di Paolo T: Sex and estrous cycle variations of rat striatal dopamine uptake sites. Neuroendocrinology 1993, 58: 16–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Becker JB: Gender differences in dopaminergic function in striatum and nucleus accumbens. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1999, 64: 803–812.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dewing P, Chiang CW, Sinchak K, Sim H, Fernagut PO, Kelly S, Chesselet MF, Micevych PE, Albrecht KH, Harley VR, Vilain E: Direct regulation of adult brain function by the male-specific factor SRY. Curr Biol 2006, 16: 415–420.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gotsiridze T, Kang N, Jacob D, Forger NG: Development of sex differences in the principal nucleus of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis of mice: role of Bax-dependent cell death. Dev Neurobiol 2007, 67: 355–362.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ahern TH, Krug S, Carr AV, Murray EK, Fitzpatrick E, Bengston L, McCutcheon J, Vries GJ, Forger NG: Cell death atlas of the postnatal mouse ventral forebrain and hypothalamus: effects of age and sex. J Comp Neurol 2013, 521: 2551–2569.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hisasue S, Seney ML, Immerman E, Forger NG: Control of cell number in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis of mice: role of testosterone metabolites and estrogen receptor subtypes. J Sex Med 2010, 7: 1401–1409.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jacob DA, Ray T, Bengston CL, Lindsten T, Wu J, Thompson CB, Forger NG: The role of cell death in sexually dimorphic muscle development: male-specific muscles are retained in female bax/bak knockout mice. Dev Neurobiol 2008, 68: 1303–1314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meissner A, Gnirke A, Bell GW, Ramsahoye B, Lander ES, Jaenisch R: Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33: 5868–5877.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen PY, Cokus SJ, Pellegrini M: BS Seeker: precise mapping for bisulfite sequencing. BMC Bioinforma 2010, 11: 203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pirooznia M, Nagarajan V, Deng Y: GeneVenn - a web application for comparing gene lists using Venn diagrams. Bioinformation 2007, 1: 420–422.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gentleman RCV, Dudoit S, Irizarry R, Huber W: Limma: linear models for microarray data. In Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor. New York: Springer; 2005:397–420.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Monk M: Methylation and the X chromosome. BioEssays 1986, 4: 204–208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharp AJ, Stathaki E, Migliavacca E, Brahmachary M, Montgomery SB, Dupre Y, Antonarakis SE: DNA methylation profiles of human active and inactive X chromosomes. Genome Res 2011, 21: 1592–1600.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Vries GJ: Minireview: sex differences in adult and developing brains: compensation, compensation, compensation. Endocrinology 2004, 145: 1063–1068.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cotton AM, Lam L, Affleck JG, Wilson IM, Penaherrera MS, McFadden DE, Kobor MS, Lam WL, Robinson WP, Brown CJ: Chromosome-wide DNA methylation analysis predicts human tissue-specific X inactivation. Hum Genet 2011, 130: 187–201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lopes AM, Arnold-Croop SE, Amorim A, Carrel L: Clustered transcripts that escape X inactivation at mouse XqD. Mamm Genome 2011, 22: 572–582.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang F, Babak T, Shendure J, Disteche CM: Global survey of escape from X inactivation by RNA-sequencing in mouse. Genome Res 2010, 20: 614–622.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ahmed EI, Zehr JL, Schulz KM, Lorenz BH, DonCarlos LL, Sisk CL: Pubertal hormones modulate the addition of new cells to sexually dimorphic brain regions. Nat Neurosci 2008, 11: 995–997.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maunakea AK, Nagarajan RP, Bilenky M, Ballinger TJ, D’Souza C, Fouse SD, Johnson BE, Hong C, Nielsen C, Zhao Y, Turecki G, Delaney A, Varhol R, Thiessen N, Shchors K, Heine VM, Rowitch DH, Xing X, Fiore C, Schillebeeckx M, Jones SJ, Haussler D, Marra MA, Hirst M, Wang T, Costello JF: Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature 2010, 466: 253–257.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Södersten P: Increased mounting behavior in the female rat following a single neonatal injection of testosterone propionate. Horm Behav 1973, 4: 1–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anier K, Malinovskaja K, Aonurm-Helm A, Zharkovsky A, Kalda A: DNA methylation regulates cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010, 35: 2450–2461.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murgatroyd C, Patchev AV, Wu Y, Micale V, Bockmuhl Y, Fischer D, Holsboer F, Wotjak CT, Almeida OF, Spengler D: Dynamic DNA methylation programs persistent adverse effects of early-life stress. Nat Neurosci 2009, 12: 1559–1566.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miyazaki K, Mapendano CK, Fuchigami T, Kondo S, Ohta T, Kinoshita A, Tsukamoto K, Yoshiura K, Niikawa N, Kishino T: Developmentally dynamic changes of DNA methylation in the mouse Snurf/Snrpn gene. Gene 2009, 432: 97–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dennis KE, Levitt P: Regional expression of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is correlated with dynamic patterns of promoter methylation in the developing mouse forebrain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 2005, 140: 1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Day JJ, Sweatt JD: Epigenetic mechanisms in cognition. Neuron 2011, 70: 813–829.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simunovic F, Yi M, Wang Y, Stephens R, Sonntag KC: Evidence for gender-specific transcriptional profiles of nigral dopamine neurons in Parkinson disease. PLoS ONE 2010, 5: e8856.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gilmore RF, Varnum MM, Forger NG: Effects of blocking developmental cell death on sexually dimorphic calbindin cell groups in the preoptic area and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Biol Sex Differ 2012, 3: 5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Lorme KC, Schulz KM, Salas-Ramirez KY, Sisk CL: Pubertal testosterone organizes regional volume and neuronal number within the medial amygdala of adult male Syrian hamsters. Brain Res 2012, 1460: 33–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schulz KM, Molenda-Figueira HA, Sisk CL: Back to the future: the organizational-activational hypothesis adapted to puberty and adolescence. Horm Behav 2009, 55: 597–604.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chung WC, De Vries GJ, Swaab DF: Sexual differentiation of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in humans may extend into adulthood. J Neurosci 2002, 22: 1027–1033.Google Scholar
- Pinos H, Collado P, Rodrı́guez-Zafra M, Rodrı́guez C, Segovia S, Guillamón A: The development of sex differences in the locus coeruleus of the rat. Brain Res Bull 2001, 56: 73–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wijchers PJ, Festenstein RJ: Epigenetic regulation of autosomal gene expression by sex chromosomes. Trends Genet 2011, 27: 132–140.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wijchers PJ, Yandim C, Panousopoulou E, Ahmad M, Harker N, Saveliev A, Burgoyne PS, Festenstein R: Sexual dimorphism in mammalian autosomal gene regulation is determined not only by Sry but by sex chromosome complement as well. Dev Cell 2010, 19: 477–484.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnold AP: The end of gonad-centric sex determination in mammals. Trends Genet 2012, 28: 55–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lyko F, Foret S, Kucharski R, Wolf S, Falckenhayn C, Maleszka R: The honey bee epigenomes: differential methylation of brain DNA in queens and workers. PLoS Biol 2010, 8: e1000506.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.