Open Access

Sex differences in gut fermentation and immune parameters in rats fed an oligofructose-supplemented diet

Biology of Sex Differences20156:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-015-0031-0

Received: 7 May 2015

Accepted: 10 July 2015

Published: 6 August 2015

Abstract

Background

Mechanistic data to support health claims is often generated using rodent models, and the influence of prebiotic supplementation has largely been evaluated using male rodents. Given that sex-based differences in immune parameters are well recognized and recent evidence suggests differences in microbiota composition between sexes, validation of the effectiveness of prebiotics merits assessment in both males and females. Here, we have compared the effect of oligofructose (OF) supplementation on the fecal bacterial community, short chain fatty acid profiles, and gut mucosal and systemic immune parameters in male and female rats.

Methods

Male and female rats were fed rodent chow or chow supplemented with OF (5 % w/w). Fecal community change was examined by analyzing 16S rRNA gene content. To compare effects of OF between sexes at the gut microbial and mucosal immune level, fecal short chain fatty acid and tissue cytokine profiles were measured. Serum lipopolysaccharide levels were also evaluated by the limulus amebocyte lysate assay as an indirect means of determining gut permeability between sexes.

Results

In the fecal community of females, OF supplementation altered community structure by increasing abundance in the Phylum Bacteroidetes. In male rats, no changes in fecal community structure were observed, although fecal butyrate levels significantly increased. Liver Immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels were higher in males relative to females fed OF, and serum LPS concentrations were higher in males independent of diet. Females had higher basal levels of the regulatory cytokine interleukin-10 (IL-10) in the colon and liver, while males had higher basal levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1 (CINC-1) in the cecum and liver.

Conclusions

We have shown that male and female rat gut communities metabolize an OF-supplemented diet differently. Sex-specific responses in both the fecal community and systemic immune parameters suggest that this difference may result from an increase in the availability of gut peptidyl-nitrogen in the males. These findings demonstrate the importance of performing sex-comparative studies when investigating potential health effects of prebiotics using rodent models.

Keywords

Sex Oligofructose Microbiota IgA Liver Butyrate

Background

Scientific validation of health claims is required by regulators to ensure that they are accurate and do not mislead the public. For prebiotics, substantiation not only requires demonstration of a health benefit associated with consumption but also that selective stimulation of a specific genus or group of gut bacteria and/or a metabolic activity linked with these bacteria is associated with this health improvement [1]. In health claim submissions, supporting evidence often includes animal studies. These typically involve rodents and are of particular significance in mechanistic studies [2]. However, in order to avoid confounding effects from the estrus cycle, these are typically carried out using males only, limiting insight into potential sex differences. Sexual dimorphism in immune parameters is well documented [3]. Recently, sex-based differences in certain genes associated with histone-modifying activity, and of genes associated with control of infection and inflammation, were observed in the small intestine and colon of prepubescent C57BL/6 mice [4], illustrating sexual dimorphism at the level of mucosal immunity. Evidence also supports sex-associated differences in gut community composition [57] and gut community metabolic activity [8]. Sex-dependent effects of diet on the gut microbiota have also recently been demonstrated [9]. While the mechanisms underlying interactions between sex, microbiota, and diet have yet to be fully elucidated, these differences demonstrate potential limitations in extrapolating from studies of effects of dietary prebiotics on males to effects on females.

Fructans are found in a wide variety of cereals, fruits, and vegetables, where they function as plant storage polymers [10]. In North America, estimated dietary intake ranges from 1 to 4 g/day, somewhat lower than in Europe where intakes range from 3 to 11 g/day [11]. Fructans are composed of fructose polymers linked by β1-2 glycosidic bonds that often terminate in a glucose molecule and differ in length depending on the source (plant material vs. de novo synthesis) and method of processing [12]. In general terms, fructans fall within three classes; inulin (>10 degrees of polymerization (dp)), oligofructose (OF; ≤10 dp), and fructooligosaccharides (FOS; 1–5 dp) [10, 13]. Human and rat digestive enzymes are unable to cleave the β1-2 glycosidic bond, so fructans pass intact through the small intestine into the colon where they are digested by the gut bacterial community. These compounds are often referred to as prebiotics, and increased dietary intakes are claimed to improve host gut health by selectively stimulating the growth of bifidobacteria [14]. In humans though, the extent of this specific change can vary from person to person [15]. In rats, fructans appear to stimulate the growth of bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and other lactic acid bacteria [1618], although growth stimulation of other taxa including obligate anaerobes may also occur [1921]. Fructans have been observed to increase the proportion of the short chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyrate in the gut [2225]. Butyrate not only represents the primary energy source for colonocytes but is also thought to play an important role in the maintenance of gut health [26].

Feeding fructan-supplemented diets has previously been shown to affect gut barrier function. Feeding male rats FOS or inulin-supplemented diets increases Salmonella translocation [27, 28], gut permeability, and mucin sloughing [29, 30]. The latter effect has been observed in one study of human male subjects fed FOS [31] but not in another [32]. Adverse impacts on the gut following the ingestion of fructans are thought to result from their very rapid fermentation, resulting in abnormally high localized concentrations of SCFA (and possible low pH) in the proximal colon or cecum leading to epithelial injury [27, 33].

In addition to physiological effects, fructan feeding can also affect the immune system at the gut mucosal level. For example, inulin or FOS consumption can increase lymphocyte numbers in the Peyer’s patches of female rodents under healthy and endotoxemic conditions, indicating an impact on the main inductive portion of gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) in the small intestine [34, 35]. FOS intake has also been noted to up-regulate secretion of Immunoglobulin A (IgA), a mucosal marker of gut homeostasis, in cecal and fecal contents of rodents [3638]. Mucosal IgA production is in turn influenced by multiple cytokines, including interleukin-4 (IL-4), transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), IL-10, and IL-6, that also regulate the activity of other immune cells of the GALT [39], and production of certain of these cytokines has been reported to be influenced by fructan intake [36, 38]. Fructan-mediated effects on the immune system may reflect actions of SCFA produced through fermentation and also potentially direct effects mediated through interactions with toll-like receptors (TLR) on intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) and other immune cells, including monocytes [4042].

Fructan ingestion can also affect systemic immune parameters at the level of blood and spleen [35, 43, 44], although relatively few studies have examined effects at the level of systemic immunity. Impacts at the gut mucosal level would also be anticipated to induce systemic changes via the gut–liver axis. Kupffer cells (liver macrophages), hepatocytes, and endothelial cells help maintain immune regulation at the liver by inducing tolerance to gut-derived antigens [45, 46]. The liver is one of the tissues that is sexually dimorphic in its gene expression [47, 48], potentially contributing to sex-associated effects of fructan-containing diets on systemic immune markers.

Here, we have examined how a diet supplemented with OF influences the metabolic activity and structure of the fecal bacterial community and systemic host-immune parameters in both female and male rats. Sex-associated differences in the metabolism of this diet illustrate the importance of including both males and females in animal studies used to investigate the universality of health effects of dietary fibers and fermentable substrates.

Methods

Feeding trial

Forty eight, 28–42-day-old, BioBreeding control male (n = 24) and female rats (n = 24) were obtained from the Animal Resource Division of Health Canada. The BioBreeding control rat is an in-house bred rat line originally derived from Wistar rats. Rats were fed a control diet (Purina 5001 rodent chow, 12 males and 12 females) or rodent chow supplemented with 5 % (w/w) OF (dp 2–8, Orafti, Pemuco, Chile; 12 males and 12 females) for 42 days. Rats had free access to reverse-osmosis treated water, were separately housed within individual mesh bottomed-stainless steel cages, and subjected to a 12-h light/dark cycle. A 2-week acclimatization period (control diet) preceded the 6-week experimental feeding trial, after which the rats were euthanized and tissues were collected. This study was approved by the Health Canada Animal Care Committee and the University of Ontario Institute of Technology Animal Care Committee (AUP 12–003). Six animals from each treatment group were randomly selected for cytokine analysis, and the remaining six used for immunophenotyping and fecal community analysis.

Analysis of fecal SCFAs

Gas chromatographic analysis of fecal SCFAs and branch-chain fatty acids (BCFAs) were performed as previously reported [49].

Isolation of fecal DNA, construction and analysis of 16S rRNA gene libraries, and real-time (q)PCR

Fecal pellets were collected from each rat at necroscopy. Feces from individual rats were sampled by weight (1.0 g/rat) and then pooled based on diet and sex (n = 6 pellets × four treatment groups). Samples were pooled to reduce inter-rat fecal community variability [50]. Pooled feces from each treatment group were frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle, and duplicate community DNA samples isolated using the QIAamp DNA stool Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, Ontario). DNA was stored frozen at −20 °C. Duplicate near full length 16S rRNA gene libraries were prepared from the DNA isolated from each treatment group. Libraries were constructed as previously described using primers F44 and R1592 [51], with amplicons cloned into the vector pCR2.1-TOPO and transformed into Escherichia coli TOP10 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). One hundred transformants were randomly picked from each duplicate clone library, the plasmids isolated and sequenced as previously described [51]. Sequence alignments were carried out against the Silva data base [52] and checked for chimeric sequences using Chimera-slayer, all implemented through Mothur [53]. Sequences were initially binned based on their best match in the Silva data base [52] <3 % sequence divergence) followed by a ClustalW alignment and the generation of nearest neighbor trees [54] with sequences aligning ≤3 % sequence divergence further binned. Phylotypes were classified using Seqmatch [55]. Specific changes in 16S rRNA gene content in fecal DNA under each treatment were also determined by quantitative (q)-PCR using previously described oligonucleotide primer sets and conditions for quantification of the phylum Bacteroidetes [56] and the genus Lactobacillus [57]. Gene copy numbers (copies/ng community DNA) were expressed as a percentage of the total bacterial 16S rRNA gene content determined using the universal primers HDA1 and HDA2 and conditions as previously described [51].

Tissue preparation

Blood was collected during necroscopy from the portal vein of the liver. GI tract tissues (ileum, cecum, and colon) and systemic tissues (liver) were collected, snap frozen, and stored at −80 °C and subsequently homogenized in the presence of a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Chemical Co.) as previously described [58]. Homogenized tissues were centrifuged for 30 min at 16,100×g. Supernatants were then recovered and stored at −80 °C for further cytokine and immunoglobulin analysis.

Serum biochemistry

Individual serum samples were analyzed for blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) content. BUN levels were measured using the urease-glutamate dehydrogenase method [59] using an ABX Pentra 400 Automated clinical chemistry analyzer and ABX Pentra test kits for BUN (Horiba Canada Inc., Burlington, ON, Canada). Serum endotoxin (LPS) concentrations were analyzed using the endpoint chromogenic limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay (Lonza, Switzerland). The assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol and measurable levels of LPS were expressed as EU/ml.

Flow cytometry

Flow cytometric analysis of mucosal (mesenteric lymph node) and systemic (spleen) samples was performed using a Becton Dickinson fluorescent activated cell sorter (FACSCalibur flow cytometer, San Jose, California). Gating techniques were as previously described [60]. Antibodies used for cell surface staining were anti-CD45 (PE-Cy5, Clone OX-1; leukocyte common antigen), anti-CD3 (APC, Clone 1 F4; total T cell), anti-CD4 (PE, Clone OX-35; T helper), anti-CD8a (FITC, Clone OX-8; cytotoxic T cell), anti-CD45RA (FITC, Clone OX-33; B cell), and anti-CD161a (PE, Clone 10/78; natural killer cell). Intensity of macrophage (CD68) expression was also analyzed as an indicator of macrophage activation using anti-CD68 (Alexa Fluor 488, ED1 clone) [61]. Fluorochrome-matched isotype controls were used to assess non-specific binding. All antibodies were obtained from BD Biosciences (Mississauga, Ontario), except for CD68 which was purchased from AbD Serotec (Raleigh, North Carolina).

Cytokine and IgA analysis

Cytokines (CINC-1, IL-6, TGF-β1, IL-4, and IL-10) and immunoglobulin IgA concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) using manufacturer’s protocols (R&D systems and Bethyl Laboratories, respectively). ELISAs were performed using streptavidin conjugated to horseradish-peroxidase, and plates were read at a wavelength of 450 nm on a Synergy HTTR microplate reader (Bio-Tek, USA). Results for cytokines and IgA were expressed as ng/g or μg/g of tissue, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Cluster analysis of 16S rRNA gene libraries was carried out using PC-ORD (MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon) using a Bray-Curtis distance measure and the group average linkage method. Rarefaction and fecal community diversity indices were obtained using the Fastgroup II on line software [62]. Immunological data was analyzed using a two-way and three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to examine overall effects of diet, sex, and tissue, as appropriate. Differences were further analyzed using a multiple range test when ANOVA p < 0.050. Data were checked for a potential correlation between means and SD before ANOVA. When a correlation was observed, the data were transformed using the Box-Cox formula: T(Y) = (Y^lambda − 1)/lambda where Y is the response variable and lambda is the transformation parameter [63]. Values of lambda were chosen to minimize the mean-square error. Unless otherwise indicated, values represent means ± SEM for indicated number of rats.

Results

Feeding trial and fecal SCFA/BCFA

Weight gain (Table 1) was unaffected by diet in males and females (p = 0.31) but differed significantly between sexes (p < 0.001). Energy consumption was also unaffected by diet (p = 0.57) but was higher in males compared to females (p < 0.001). Differences in food intake and energy intake reflected the final body weights at necropsy (p < 0.001). OF-fed male and female rats had significantly larger ceca (p < 0.003). Total fecal fatty acid outputs (Fig. 1) of rats fed OF (μmol day-1) were approximately 1.3× those fed chow (n = 6 males and n = 6 females per diet group; p = 0.002), although fecal outputs (g dry weight d-1) were not significantly different (p = 0.32). SCFA and BCFA profiles changed with both diet and sex. In females consuming chow, acetate levels were lower than in those consuming OF, although this difference was not significant. The OF-supplemented diet significantly increased butyrate and caproic acid outputs in males. Other BCFAs also trended upwards in males fed OF.
Table 1

Food intake and growth characteristicsa

 

Male

Female

Control

OF

Control

OF

Weight gain (g)

135.2 ± 3.5

140.2 ± 3.5

55. 9 ± 3.9*

55.6 ± 3.7*

Total weightb (g)

392.0 ± 6.1

401.1 ± 3.9

227.5 ± 5.0*

231.0 ± 5.1*

Energy Intake (kcal/d)

93.0 ± 1.6

90.6 ± 1.1

71.6 ± 1.5*

76.1 ± 2.8*

Cecal weight (g)

7.6 ± 0.2

9.9 ± 0.2

5.1 ± 0.3*

6.5 ± 0.4*

OF oligofructose

*Significance based on sex as analyzed by ANOVA

aValues are presented as mean ± SEM for male (n = 13–18) and female (n = 12) rats fed the control or OF-supplemented diet

bThe total weight was taken at necropsy

Fig. 1

SCFA (a) and BCFA (b) output in rats fed rodent chow or rodent chow supplemented with OF. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6–8); significant differences in SCFA or BCFA concentrations are indicated by different letters. Columns are arranged as follows: females fed rodent chow, females fed chow supplemented with OF, males fed rodent chow, males fed chow supplemented with OF

Impact of oligofructan on the fecal bacterial community

A total of 104 near full length 16S rRNA phylotypes were identified in the feces obtained from these rats, a level of community richness somewhat lower than is typically found by pyrosequencing (50, 64). Approximately 44 % of these were shared between the male and female control fecal communities, while only 25 % were shared among all four treatment groups. In females, 70 % of the phylotypes were shared between diets, compared to only 60 % in the males. Feeding OF reduced fecal community richness in males, increased it in females, but had little effect on fecal community diversity (Table 2). A cluster analysis indicated that the communities partitioned by sex rather than diet (Fig. 2). At the phylum level, fecal community structure was similar between the males and females fed the control diet (upper pie charts, Fig. 3). In males, Lactobacillaceae content was higher than found in females and this was independent of diet (~11 % in males versus ~2 % in females). Feeding OF increased the content of Bacteroidetes in females (23 % in control versus 47 % in OF-fed females), but not males (16.1 % in the control versus 16.3 % in OF-fed males; lower pie charts, Fig. 3). Increases in the content of Bacteroidetes in females fed OF resulted from increases in the content of phylotypes primarily aligning within the Families Porphyromonadaceae (Genus Barnesiella) and Prevotellaceae (Genus Prevotella). Most of the phylotypes eliciting increased abundance in response to OF supplementation in females were also present in males (Table 3). Feeding males OF increased the content of phylotypes aligning within the Family Lachnospiraceae, but decreased their content in females (bar charts, Fig. 3). Differences in the abundance of the Bacteroidetes and lactobacilli were also determined by qPCR analysis using phylum and genus-specific primer sets and each of the fecal DNA pools. In females, OF increased the abundance of the Bacteroidetes (35.5 % in control versus 52.2 % in OF-fed females) but had no effect in the males (37.8 % in control versus 36.4 % in OF-fed males). While 16S rRNA libraries underestimated the content of Bacteroidetes within each community, the trend remained the same. Estimates for lactobacilli abundance were similar between both approaches, being higher in males (8.7 % in control versus 8.8 % in OF-fed males), than in females (3.6 % in control versus 1.5 % in OF-fed females).
Table 2

Estimates of richness (Chao1) and diversity (Shannon index) in the fecal community of male and female rats fed chow or the OF-supplemented diet

Treatment

Chao1a

Shannon indexa

Male chow

106

3.7

Male chow + OF

80

3.7

Female chow

87

3.4

Female chow + OF

108

3.6

OF oligofructose

aCalculated using the Fastgroup II online software [62]

Fig. 2

Cluster analysis comparing community diversity (phylotype occurrence and abundance) in feces from rats fed rodent chow or OF-supplemented rodent chow

Fig. 3

Change in the male and female fecal community in response to diet. Bar graphs indicate the distribution of phylotypes (%) at the family level. Rats fed rodent chow (black bar) or rodent chow supplemented with OF (white bar). Left panel: females. Right panel: males. Arrows indicate major taxa undergoing change in response to OF (A) Family Porphyromonadaceae. (B) Family Prevotellaceae. (C) Family Lachnospiraceae. Inset: Pie charts show the distribution of phylotypes at the level of phylum in rats fed rodent chow (upper pie charts) or rodent chow supplemented with OF (lower pie charts)

Table 3

Changes in the abundance of phylotypes aligning within the Genera Barnesiella and Prevotella in rats fed rat chow or rat chow supplemented with OF

Clone

RDP relative

S_aba

RDP classification

Phylotype abundance (percent of total community)

    

Male

+OF

Female

+OF

A15461

S001381749

0.96

Barnesiella

1.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

F19056

S000715072

0.98

Barnesiella

0.0

0.0

0.5

2.2

F19074

S001381499

1.00

Barnesiella

0.0

0.0

0.5

0.6

G19307

S001380091

1.00

Barnesiella

1.1

1.4

0.0

3.9

G19322

S001080987

1.00

Barnesiella

0.0

0.0

0.5

1.1

G19350

S001380841

0.99

Barnesiella

0.0

0.0

0.5

0.6

G20673

S000707322

0.98

Barnesiella

0.5

0.7

1.1

0.6

G20691

S001380274

0.95

Barnesiella

1.1

1.4

0.5

2.2

G20696

S001381099

0.97

Barnesiella

0.5

0.7

0.0

2.8

   

Total Barnesiella

4.3

4.2

3.8

14.0

F20815

S001380751

0.96

Prevotella

3.3

4.2

7.7

12.4

G19310

S003238090

0.98

Prevotella

2.2

0.7

1.6

6.7

   

Total Prevotella

5.4

4.9

9.3

19.1

Total increase in Barnesiella and Prevotella

   

9.8

9.1

13.1

33.1

OF oligofructose

aSimilarity coefficient RDP Seqmatch

IgA concentrations

Total IgA levels were determined in cecal contents and in liver tissue. Cecal IgA levels were unaffected by diet or sex (data not shown). In contrast, liver IgA concentrations in males were higher than in females, and increased significantly over females when fed OF (Fig. 4a).
Fig. 4

Changes in immune status in rats consuming rodent chow (black bar) or rodent chow supplemented with OF (white bar). a Liver IgA levels (μg/g) are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 5–6). Males demonstrated significantly (p = 0.01) elevated levels of liver IgA relative to females. An interaction (diet × sex; p = 0.04) for liver IgA was also detected by two-way ANOVA analysis of males compared to females consuming OF. Differing letters denote significant differences as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test. b Serum LPS concentrations (EU/ml) are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 4–5). **Significance (p = 0.004) based on sex, with males having elevated concentrations of serum LPS compared to females

Serum biochemistry

In order to determine whether endogenous urea may have contributed to the gut fermentation in male and female rats fed either diet, we measured serum BUN levels. BUN levels were unaffected by diet or sex (males control/OF: 18.62 ± 0.9 and 17.94 ± 1.48, females control/OF: 18.94 ± 1.31 and 17.61 ± 0.92; n = 6). LPS concentrations in the serum of males and females fed either diet were determined to assess gut barrier functionality. Diet had no effect on serum LPS concentrations; however, males had significantly higher circulating LPS concentrations relative to females (Fig. 4b).

GI tract and liver tissue cytokine changes

In order to examine immunological effects associated with OF, cytokine concentrations were measured in gastrointestinal tissues and liver. Basal cytokine levels varied significantly between tissues and with sex, with the exception of the regulatory cytokine TGF-β1 which was unaffected by sex (Table 4). In general, colonic tissue cytokine concentrations were higher in females than males. Although diet had no major effect on tissue cytokine levels, interactions for CINC-1 (diet × sex; p = 0.007) and for IL-6 (tissue × sex × diet; p = 0.02) were noted. At the systemic level, liver tissue concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and CINC-1 were higher in males compared to females, while the concentration of the regulatory cytokine IL-10 was highest in the liver of females.
Table 4

Cytokine levels in gastrointestinal and liver tissue in male and female rats fed control or OF-supplemented diets

  

Male

Female

Main and interaction (p value)

Cytokine(ng/g)

Tissuea

Control

OF

Control

OF

Dietb

Sexc

Diet × sexd

Tissue × diete

Tissue × sexf

Tissue × diet × sexg

CINC-1

Ileum

0.23 ± 0.01

0.25 ± 0.02

0.02 ± 0.02

0.17 ± 0.10

      
 

Cecum

0.89 ± 0.23

0.69 ± 0.14

0.14 ± 0.14

0.51 ± 0.19

0.08

< 0.001

0.007

0.06

< 0.001

NS

 

Colon

0.70 ± 0.12

0.46 ± 0.07

1.59 ± 0.06

1.75 ± 0.13

      
 

Liver

10.95 ± 0.88

9.06 ± 0.96

6.56 ± 1.30

5.27 ± 0.38

      

IL-6

Ileum

ND

ND

1.33 ± 0.45

2.41 ± 0.18

      
 

Cecum

7.85 ± 0.92

7.73 ± 0.86

5.83 ± 0.71

5.06 ± 0.54

NS

< 0.001

NS

0.08

< 0.001

0.02

 

Colon

1.94 ± 0.24

2.45 ± 0.36

6.22 ± 1.17

4.59 ± 0.58

      
 

Liver

159.16 ± 11.94

173.42 ± 18.92

107.77 ± 9.43

93.81 ± 11.67

      

TGF-β1

Ileum

0.47 ± 0.03

0.54 ± 0.04

ND

ND

      
 

Cecum

2.45 ± 0.91

2.22 ± 0.89

2.09 ± 1.04

2.50 ± 1.25

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

 

Colon

0.44 ± 0.01

0.54 ± 0.03

0.72 ± 0.05

0.72 ± 0.04

      
 

Liver

36.97 ± 1.51

41.54 ± 2.24

39.36 ± 3.23

37.48 ± 4.70

      

IL-4

Ileum

0.14 ± 0.02

0.13 ± 0.03

0.89 ± 0.16

1.12 ± 0.17

      
 

Cecum

2.92 ± 0.53

2.28 ± 0.37

1.98 ± 0.10

2.34 ± 0.07

NS

< 0.001

0.08

NS

< 0.001

NS

 

Colon

1.06 ± 0.14

0.80 ± 0.07

3.85 ± 0.28

4.70 ± 0.12

      
 

Liver

32.56 ± 0.76

40.98 ± 6.13

48.99 ± 6.22

45.19 ± 6.49

      

IL-10

Ileum

3.9 ± 0.30

4.92 ± 0.66

1.28 ± 0.2

1.24 ± 0.21

      
 

Cecum

5.30 ± 0.24

6.48 ± 1.27

8.16 ± 0.84

6.66 ± 0.34

NS

< 0.001

NS

NS

< 0.001

NS

 

Colon

0.95 ± 0.13

0.77 ± 0.12

10.03 ± 0.68

9.84 ± 0.57

      
 

Liver

73.21 ± 4.18

75.39 ± 7.11

108.27 ± 11.09

111.42 ± 9.98

      

OF oligofructose, ND not detectable, NS not significant

aValues denote the mean (ng/g) ± SEM (n = 3–6) for each tissue

bSignificance for diet was detected using three-way ANOVA

cSignificance for sex was detected using three-way ANOVA

dInteractions between diet × sex were detected using three-way ANOVA

eInteractions between tissue × diet were detected using three-way ANOVA

fInteractions between tissue × sex were detected using three-way ANOVA

gInteractions between tissue × diet × sex were detected using three-way ANOVA

Mesenteric lymph node and spleen immune cell phenotyping

In the mesenteric lymph node (MLN), supplementing the diet with OF had no impact on the population distribution of immune cell phenotypes. However, significant differences were noted between immune cell phenotype distributions based on sex (Table 5). MLN total T cell (CD3+) percentages were significantly (p = 0.002) higher in females, while MLN total B cell (CD45RA+) percentages were significantly (p = 0.001) higher in males, irrespective of diet. Macrophage (CD68+) population percentages were higher in the MLN and spleen of females relative to males (p = 0.001; p = 0.002, respectively). Overall, diet significantly affected splenic total T cell (CD3+; p = 0.040) populations in females, with the lowest percentage of splenic T cells observed in rats consuming the OF-supplemented diet.
Table 5

Immune cell phenotypes in the mesenteric lymph node (MLN) and spleen of males and female rats consuming either the control rat chow or chow supplemented with OF

Tissue

Cell phenotypea

Male

Female

Dietb

Sexc

Diet × sexd

Control

OF

Control

OF

MLN

CD3+

72.62 ± 0.86

72.97 ± 1.47

76.98 ± 0.22

76.94 ± 1.25

NS

0.002

NS

CD3+4+

52.19 ± 0.69

52.59 ± 0.73

54.79 ± 0.76

52.82 ± 1.43

NS

NS

NS

CD3+8+

19.02 ± 1.22

18.31 ± 1.02

20.29 ± 0.67

21.83 ± 1.52

NS

NS

NS

CD45RA+

23.36 ± 0.78

23.00 ± 1.55

18.80 ± 0.58

18.71 ± 1.25

NS

0.001

NS

CD3161+

0.33 ± 0.08

0.31 ± 0.08

0.39 ± 0.09

0.28 ± 0.04

NS

NS

NS

CD68+

5.94 ± 0.77

5.49 ± 0.51

8.77 ± 0.78

8.09 ± 0.46

NS

<0.001

NS

Spleen

CD3+

71.67 ± 1.18

69.03 ± 1.96

73.03 ± 0.94

69.23 ± 1.12

0.04

NS

NS

CD3+4+

45.53 ± 1.51

44.11 ± 1.43

46.10 ± 0.94

42.65 ± 1.21

NS

NS

NS

CD3+8+

25.47 ± 0.90

24.93 ± 0.53

25.45 ± 0.67

25.04 ± 0.54

NS

NS

NS

CD45RA+

18.52 ± 1.06

20.51 ± 1.39

15.41 ± 1.21

18.56 ± 1.43

NS

NS

NS

CD3+161

1.18 ± 0.2

1.57 ± 0.24

1.80 ± 0.18

1.38 ± 0.13

NS

NS

NS

CD68+

41.58 ± 1.67

40.72 ± 1.49

45.97 ± 2.41

49.15 ± 1.28

NS

0.002

NS

OF oligofructose, NS not significant

aCell phenotypes are expressed as the percent of the CD45+ (leukocyte common antigen) cell population. Values indicate the percent mean ± SEM (n = 5–6) for each immune cell type in the MLN and spleen

bEffects of diet were detected using two-way ANOVA

cDifferences between sexes were detected using two-way ANOVA

dSignificance of interactions was detected using two-way ANOVA

Discussion

The gut communities in male and female rats metabolized an OF-supplemented chow differently, and this was reflected in changes to the relative proportions of fecal butyrate and certain BCFAs in males, and in differences in fecal community structure between the sexes. In contrast, when fed the control diet, both SCFA outputs and fecal community structures were very similar in both sexes. Where the control fecal communities differed was in terms of composition, sharing only 44 % of the identified phylotypes. Sex-based differences in the fecal communities of rodents have previously been observed [6, 65]. While OF supplementation affected fecal community composition in both male and female rats to varying extents, the resulting communities remained more similar based on sex rather than diet, and broad diet-associated changes in fecal community structure were limited exclusively to the females. Feeding OF had no impact on weight gain, but did significantly increase fecal SCFA outputs in both sexes. Owing to its high solubility, OF would be expected to be rapidly fermented in the cecum, consistent with the increased empty cecal weights observed here and in other studies [22].

In females, OF altered fecal community structure by increasing the content of phylotypes in the phylum Bacteroidetes (primarily the families Prevotella and Barnesiella), and this occurred largely at the expense of the family Lachnospiraceae (phylum Firmicutes). We have observed an identical shift in the feces of male rats fed various fermentable substrates, and this is thought to follow from increases in the availability of gut ammonia and its use as a nitrogen source to support continued microbial growth in the distal gut [64]. In fact, isolates in the genus Prevotella have a preference for ammonia as a nitrogen source [66] and we suspect that this is likely true for the yet to be cultivated species in the genus Barnesiella. Ammonia arises from the hydrolysis of endogenous urea and by the fermentation of dietary and endogenous proteins, peptides, and amino acids [67]. We would expect that gut urea concentrations in rats would generally be quite low, as has been observed in humans [68]. Furthermore, we found no indication of increased urea flux into the gut following OF supplementation (i.e., no change in blood urea nitrogen concentration) as observed in rats fed resistant starch [50]. On this basis, the bulk of the ammonia used to support microbial growth in the distal gut would likely originate from fermentation. Protein fermentation occurs concurrently with carbohydrate fermentation [50, 64] and ammonia resulting from deamination of the amino acids increases in concentration distally down the gut tract [69]. Increased nitrogen demand in the proximal gut due to the inclusion of an additional rapidly fermented substrate to the diet depletes the available peptidyl-nitrogen sources and in females resulted in a distal gut community where continued growth would be dependent primarily on ammonia. This change is reflected in an increase in the abundance of the phylum Bacteroidetes in the feces [64].

In contrast to females, fecal community structure in the OF-fed males remained similar to that found under the control diet. This finding is similar to a recent rat trial where feeding a different prebiotic (xylo-oligosaccharide) was also found to have quite modest impacts on the fecal community [70]. In males, OF significantly increased caproic acid output and an upward trend was also observed for the other BCFA concentrations. Since BCFAs are a marker for gut protein fermentation [69], it would be expected that increases in ammonia would also occur. It was therefore unusual that we observed no increase in the abundance of the Bacteroidetes in the fecal community of males, despite sharing many of the affected phylotypes with OF-fed females. Communities based on the analysis of 16S rRNA gene libraries are subject to a variety of artifacts which can potentially impact the inferred structure [71]. Indeed, direct determinations of Bacteroidetes content (qPCR) were generally higher than indicated by the clone libraries. We have previously observed similar differences in Bacteroidetes content in male rat fecal samples subjected to 16S rRNA pyrosequencing compared to determinations based on qPCR or shot gun metagenomics [50, 64]. However, despite this difference, the overall trend, i.e., the shift toward the Bacteroidetes in OF-fed females only, was identical between 16S rRNA and qPCR analysis. We suggest that sex-based differences in the fecal community response of rats fed OF might reflect differences in the availability of peptidyl-nitrogen in the distal gut.

Since male and female rats consumed a proportionally equivalent amount of protein types in both diets, either male rats have a reduced ability to digest dietary protein in the small intestine, allowing more protein to pass into the lower gut, or additional endogenous protein sources must be present in the male gut lumen, but absent in the females. Again, we did observe a trend toward higher relative concentrations of BCFAs in males fed OF which could indicate more protein fermentation than in the corresponding females. Moreover, results from our immunological analysis of these rats also support the latter. In Sprague–Dawley rats, the male colon is more permeable than that of females [72], and our results also support differences in gut barrier function independent of diet in male and female BioBreeding control rats. Firstly, serum LPS concentrations in male rats were higher than in females, independent of diet, a finding consistent with increased translocation of gut bacteria in males, as shown by others [27]. In addition, liver tissues from males showed significantly higher levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and CINC-1. Both cytokines are involved in the immune response to inflammation and tissue injury, and increased IL-6 production is associated with mucosal barrier injury in male rats [7274]. Finally, basal liver IgA levels were significantly higher in males than females and further increased when fed the OF-containing diet. IgA is the major immunoglobulin found in the mucosal secretions of mammals and is important in protecting the host from invasion by pathogenic bacteria [75]. In both rats and humans, liver macrophages (Kupffer cells) are involved in the removal of IgA-opsonized bacteria and antigens via FCRα1 receptors, an important role when gut barrier function is reduced [75, 76]. Although we did not directly analyze gut barrier integrity by methods such as FITC-dextran administration, these findings suggest a decrease in the gut barrier, leading to heightened pro-inflammatory cytokine and IgA production at the systemic level in male rats compared to females. A more permeable gut would in turn permit increased diffusion of host proteins into the lumen, providing a source of peptidyl-nitrogen for gut microbes.

Feeding fructans to rats is known to impact gut barrier function, inducing the shedding of mucin and increasing the translocation of gut pathogens [2729]. While we observed systemic immune effects that would be consistent with heightened gut permeability in males, increased gut permeability in males fed OF might also result from a higher turnover of gut mucosal cells. Colonocyte maturation and differentiation appears to be dependent on butyrate [77, 78], which increased in fecal contents of males fed the OF-supplemented diet. A higher rate of colonic epithelial turnover would also increase protein availability in the male lumen and may further contribute to differences in gut permeability between males and females.

In contrast to the changes in liver pro-inflammatory cytokine levels associated with reduced gut barrier function in males, female liver and gastrointestinal tract tissue had high basal levels of IL-10, a cytokine known for its role in mucosal homeostasis [79]. Female rats consuming the OF-supplemented chow had the highest levels of IL-4 in the cecum and colon, tissues in which IL-10 levels were high. This is a cytokine profile indicative of TH2 activity, a T cell phenotype that supports antibody production and mediates immune homeostasis at the gut level [80, 81]. Additionally, females had a higher percentage of MLN CD68+ cells, indicating an increased presence of macrophages in the MLN along with higher levels of IL-10 compared to males. IL-4 and IL-10 are inducers of M2 phenotype macrophages that help maintain a tolerogenic gut environment and in turn differentiate T helper cells into TH2 [82]. These cell phenotypes and cytokine profiles would support greater gut barrier integrity [83] potentially contributing to differences between sexes in preventing gut-derived stimuli from entering into systemic compartments. Diet and sex also had differential effects at the systemic immune level. Splenic CD3+ (total T cell) percentages were affected by diet, with the lowest percentages observed in female rats consuming the OF-supplemented diet, while splenic macrophage (CD68+) populations were higher in females compared to males. Together, this suggests that immune population distributions can be selectively affected by diet and sex, at the systemic and mucosal level.

Conclusions

We have examined the effects of feeding an OF-supplemented rodent chow diet on microbial metabolism and immune measures in male and female BioBreeding rats. Our results demonstrate that the gut community in male and female rats metabolized this diet differently, and this appears to result from a difference in the source of available fixed-nitrogen used to support gut microbial growth leading to differences in SCFA and BCFA profiles and downstream systemic immune effects between males and females. Animal studies represent an important tool to both investigate and provide evidence to support health claims for functional foods such as fructans, but traditionally, these studies have tended to avoid the use of female rodents. However, as demonstrated here, examining only male rats may lead to the erroneous conclusion that fructans are universally butyrogenic, while a complex metabolic and digestive interaction underlies this effect. Our findings not only demonstrate the importance of nitrogen source as a factor controlling community diversity in the lower gut of monogastric animals but also illustrate the need to consider sex in studies investigating health impacts ensuing from the ingestion of functional foods or ingredients aimed at improving gut health.

Abbreviations

BCFA: 

branch-chain fatty acid

BUN: 

blood urea nitrogen

CD: 

cluster of differentiation

CINC-1: 

cytokine-induced chemoattractant-1

dp: 

degree polymerization

FCRα1: 

fragment, crystallizable receptor α1

FOS: 

fructooligosaccharide

GALT: 

gut-associated lymphoid tissue

MLN: 

mesenteric lymph node

OF: 

oligofructose

TH2: 

T helper 2

TLR: 

toll-like receptor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was funded through grants provided by the National Science and Engineering Research Council (JG-J), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (MK), and Health Canada (SB). MK and JG-J receive research support from General Mills Inc. The authors wish to thank Judy Green (Health Canada) for her excellent technical assistance throughout this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Applied Bioscience Graduate Program and Faculty of Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology
(2)
Atlantic Food and Horticulture Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
(3)
Bureau of Nutritional Sciences, Health Canada

References

  1. Pineiro M, Asp NG, Reid G, Macfarlane S, Morelli L, Brunser O, et al. FAO Technical meeting on prebiotics. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42(Suppl 3 Pt 2):S156–159.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooks SPJ, Kalmokoff ML. Prebiotics and probiotics: Some thoughts on demonstration of efficacy within the regulatory sphere. J AOAC Internat. 2012;95(1):2–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Sankaran-Walters S, Macal M, Grishina I, Nagy L, Goulart L, Coolidge K, et al. Sex differences matter in the gut: effect on mucosal immune activation and inflammation. Biol Sex Differ. 2013;4(1):10.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Steegenga WT, Mischke M, Lute C, Boekschoten MV, Pruis MG, Lendvai A, et al. Sexually dimorphic characteristics of the small intestine and colon of prepubescent C57BL/6 mice. Biol Sex Differ. 2014;5:11.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Markle JG, Frank DN, Mortin-Toth S, Robertson CE, Feazel LM, Rolle-Kampczyk U, et al. Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity. Science. 2013;339(6123):1084–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernbom N, Norrung B, Saadbye P, Lolbak L, Vogensen FK, Licht TR. Comparison of methods and animal models commonly used for investigation of caecal microbiota: effect of time, host and sex. J Microbiol Methods. 2006;66(1):87–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Li M, Wang B, Zhang M, Rantalainen M, Wang S, Zhou H, et al. Symbiotic gut microbes modulate human metabolic phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(6):2117–22.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. McOrist AL, Miller RB, Bird AR, Keogh JB, Noakes M, Topping DL, et al. Fecal butyrate levels vary widely among individuals but are usually increased by a diet high in resistant starch. J Nutr. 2011;141(5):883–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolnick DI, Snowberg LK, Hirsch PE, Lauber CL, Org E, Parks B, et al. Individual diet has sex-dependent effects on vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4500.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hendry GAF. Evolutionary origins and natural functions of fructans – a climatological, biogeographic and mechanistic appraisal. New Phytol. 1993;123(1):3–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Coussement PAA. Inulin and oligofructose: safe intakes and legal status. J Nutr. 1999;129(7 Suppl):1412S–7S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Singh RS, Singh RP. Fructooligosaccharides from inulin as prebiotics. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2010;48:435–50.Google Scholar
  13. Bornet FR, Brouns F, Tashiro Y, Duvillier V. Nutritional aspects of short-chain fructooligosaccharides: natural occurrence, chemistry, physiology and health implications. Dig Liver Dis. 2002;34 Suppl 2:S111–120.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Looijer-van Langen MA, Dieleman LA. Prebiotics in chronic intestinal inflammation. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(3):454–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. MacFarlane S, MacFarlane GT, Cummings JH. Prebiotics in the gastrointestinal tract. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24(5):701–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Howard MD, Gordon DT, Garleb KA, Kerley MS. Dietary fructooligosaccharide, xylooligosaccharide and gum Arabic have variable effects on caecal and colonic microbiota and epithelial cell proliferation in mice and rats. J Nutr. 1995;125(10):2604–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sghir A, Chow JM, Mackie RI. Continuous culture selection of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli from human faecal samples using fructooligosaccharide as selective substrate. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;85(4):769–77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Le Blay GM, Michel CD, Blottière HM, Cherbut CJ. Raw potato starch and short-chain fructo-oligosaccharides affect the composition and metabolic activity of rat intestinal microbiota differently depending on the caecocolonic segment involved. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(2):312–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartemink R, Van Laere KMJ, Rombouts FM. Growth of enterobacteria on fructo-oligosaccharides. J Appl Microbiol. 1997;83(3):367–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Apajalahti JH, Kettunen H, Kettunen A, Holben WE, Nurminen PH, Rautonen N, et al. Culture-independent microbial community analysis reveals that inulin in the diet primarily affects previously unknown bacteria in the mouse cecum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(10):4986–95.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Gourgue-Jeannot C, Kalmokoff ML, Kheradpir E, Kwan J, Lampi BJ, McAllister M, et al. Dietary fructooligosaccharides alter the cultivable faecal population of rats but do not stimulate the growth of intestinal bifidobacteria. Can J Microbiol. 2006;52(10):924–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Campbell JM, Fahey Jr GC, Wolf BW. Selected indigestible oligosaccharides affect large bowel mass, caecal and fecal short-chain fatty acids, pH and microflora in rats. J Nutr. 1997;127(1):130–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Le Blay G, Michel C, Blottière HM, Cherbut C. Prolonged intake of fructo-oligosaccharides induces a short-term elevation of lactic acid-producing bacteria and a persistent increase in caecal butyrate in rats. J Nutr. 1999;129(12):2231–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Perrin P, Pierre F, Patry Y, Champ M, Berreur M, Pradal G, et al. Only fibres promoting a stable butyrate producing colonic ecosystem decrease the rate of aberrant crypt foci in rats. Gut. 2001;48(1):53–61.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsukahara T, Iwasaki Y, Nakayama K, Ushida K. Stimulation of butyrate production in the large intestine of weaning piglets by dietary fructooligosaccharides and its influence on the histological variables of the large intestinal mucosa. J Nutr Sci Vitaminology. 2003;49(6):414–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. MacFarlane GT, MacFarlane S. Bacteria, colonic fermentation, and gastrointestinal health. J AOAC Internat. 2012;95(1):50–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Ten Bruggencate SJ, Bovee-Oudenhoven IM, Lettink-Wissink ML, van der Meer R. Dietary fructo-oligosaccharides dose-dependently increase translocation of Salmonella in rats. J Nutr. 2003;133(7):2313–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ten Bruggencate SJ, Bovee-Oudenhoven IM, Lettink-Wissink ML, Katan MB, van Der Meer R. Dietary fructo-oligosaccharides and inulin decrease resistance of rats to Salmonella: protective role of calcium. Gut. 2004;53(4):530–5.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ten Bruggencate SJ, Bovee-Oudenhoven MJ, Lettink-Wissink ML, van der Meer R. Dietary fructooligosaccharides increase intestinal permeability in rats. J Nutr. 2005;135(4):837–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fontaine N, Meslin JC, Lory S, Andrieux C. Intestinal mucin distribution in the germ-free rat and in the heteroxenic rat harbouring a human bacterial flora: effect of inulin in the diet. Br J Nutr. 1996;75(6):881–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Ten Bruggencate SJ, Bovee-Oudenhoven IM, Lettink-Wissink ML, Katan MB, van der Meer R. Dietary fructooligosaccharides affect intestinal barrier function in healthy men. J Nutr. 2006;136(1):70–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Scholtens PA, Alles MS, Willemsen LE, van den Braak C. Dietary fructooligosaccharides in healthy adults do not negatively affect faecal cytotoxicity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Br J Nutr. 2007;95(6):1143–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Argenzio RA, Meuten DJ. Short-chain fatty acids induce reversible injury of porcine colon. Dig Dis Sci. 1991;36(10):1459–68.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Manhart N, Spittler A, Bergmeister H, Mittlböck M, Roth E. Influence of fructooligosaccharides on Peyer’s patch lymphocyte numbers in healthy and endotoxemic mice. Nutrition. 2003;19(7–8):657–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryz NR, Meddings JB, Taylor CG. Long-chain inulin increases dendritic cells in the Peyer’s patches and increases ex vivo cytokine secretion in the spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes of growing female rats, independent of zinc status. Br J Nutr. 2009;101(11):1653–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Hosono A, Ozawa A, Kato R, Ohnishi Y, Nakanishi Y, Kimura T, et al. Dietary fructooligosaccharides induce immunoregulation of intestinal IgA secretion by murine Peyer’s patch cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2003;67(4):758–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakamura Y, Nosaka S, Suzuki M, Nagafuchi S. Dietary fructooligosaccharides up-regulate immunoglobulin A response and polymeric immunoglobulin receptor expression in intestines of infant mice. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004;137(1):52–8.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Watzl B, Girrbach S, Roller M. Inulin, oligofructose and immunomodulation. Br J Nutr. 2005;93 Suppl 1:S49–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Brandtzaeg P. Homeostatic impact of indigenous microbiota and secretory immunity. Benef Microbes. 2010;1(3):211–27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Vinolo MA, Rodrigues HG, Hatanaka E, Hebeda CB, Farsky SH, Curi R. Short-chain fatty acids stimulate the migration of neutrophils to inflammatory sites. Clin Sci (Lond). 2009;117(9):331–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Capitán-Cañadas F, Ortega-González M, Guadix E, Zarzuelo A, Suárez MD, de Medina FS, et al. Prebiotic oligosaccharides directly modulate proinflammatory cytokine production in monocytes via activation of TLR4. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013;57(5):1–13.Google Scholar
  42. Vogt L, Ramasamy U, Meyer D, Pullens G, Venema K, Faas MM, et al. Immune modulation by different types of β2 → 1-fructans is Toll-like receptor dependent. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7), e68367.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Hansen CH, Frøkiær H, Christensen AG, Bergström A, Licht TR, Hansen AK, et al. Dietary xylooligosaccharide downregulates IFN-γ and the low-grade inflammatory cytokine IL-1β systemically in mice. J Nutr. 2013;143(4):533–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Buddington KK, Donahoo JB, Buddington RK. Dietary oligofructose and inulin protect mice from enteric and systemic pathogens and tumor inducers. J Nutr. 2002;132(3):472–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Racanelli V, Rehermann B. The liver as an immunological organ. Hepatology. 2006;43(2 Suppl 1):S54–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Crispe IN. The liver as a lymphoid organ. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:147–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang X, Schadt EE, Wang S, Wang H, Arnold AP, Ingram-Drake L, et al. Tissue-specific expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. Genome Res. 2006;16(8):995–1004.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Ahluwalia A, Clodfelter KH, Waxman DJ. Sexual dimorphism of rat liver gene expression: regulatory role of growth hormone revealed by deoxyribonucleic acid microarray analysis. Mol Endocrinol. 2004;18(3):747–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Weaver GA, Tangel CT, Krause JA, Parfitt MM, Jenkins PL, Rader JM, et al. Acarbose enhances human colonic butyrate production. J Nutr. 1997;127(5):717–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kalmokoff M, Zwicker B, O'Hara M, Matias F, Green J, Shastri P, et al. Temporal change in the gut community of rats fed high amylose cornstarch is driven by endogenous urea rather than strictly on carbohydrate availability. J Appl Microbiol. 2013;114(5):1516–28.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Abnous K, Brooks SP, Kwan J, Matias F, Green-Johnson J, Selinger LB, et al. Diets enriched in oat bran or wheat bran temporally and differentially alter the composition of the fecal community of rats. J Nutr. 2009;139(11):2024–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41D(Database Issue):D590–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. Introducing Mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(23):7537–41.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27(2):221–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, et al. The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database Issue):D141–5.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Rinttilä T, Kassinen A, Malinen E, Krogius L, Palva A. Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA‐targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real‐time PCR. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(6):1166–77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Castillo M, Martín-Orúe SM, Manzanilla EG, Badiola I, Martín M, Gasa J. Quantification of total bacteria, enterobacteria and lactobacilli populations in pig digesta by real-time PCR. Vet Microbiol. 2006;114(1):165–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Hoentjen F, Welling GW, Harmsen HJ, Zhang X, Snart J, Tannock GW, et al. Reduction of colitis by prebiotics in HLA-B27 transgenic rats is associated with microflora changes and immunomodulation. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11(11):977–85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Talke H, Schubert GE. Enzymatic urea determination in the blood and serum in the Warburg optical test. Klin Wochenschr. 1965;43:174–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Shingadia D, O'Gorman M, Rowley AH, Shulman ST. Surface and cytoplasmic immunoglobulin expression in circulating B-lymphocytes in acute Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Res. 2001;50(4):538–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Onodera S, Suzuki K, Matsuno T, Kaneda K, Takagi M, Nishihira J. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor induces phagocytosis of foreign particles by macrophages in autocrine and paracrine fashion. Immunol. 1997;92(1):131–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Yu Y, Breitbart M, McNairnie P, Rohwer F. FastGroupII: A web-based bioinformatics platform for analyses of large 16S rDNA libraries. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:57.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Onishi H. A knowledge-based variable selection method for Box-Cox transformation. J Jpn Stat Soc. 2002;32(1):15–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Kalmokoff M, Franklin J, Petronella N, Green J, Brooks SPJ. Phylum level change in the cecal and fecal gut communities of rats fed diets containing different fermentable substrates supports a role for nitrogen as a factor contributing to community structure. Nutrients. 2015;7(5):3279–99.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Fushuku S, Fukuda K. Sex difference in the composition of fecal flora in laboratory mice, as detected by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Exp Anim. 2008;57(5):489–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Wen Z, Morrison M. The NAD(P)H-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase activities of Prevotella ruminicola B(1)4 can be attributed to one enzyme (GdhA), and gdhA expression is regulated in response to the nitrogen source available for growth. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(10):3826–33.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Fuller MF, Reeds PJ. Nitrogen cycling in the gut. Ann Rev Nutr. 1998;18:385–411.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Chacko A, Cummings JH. Nitrogen losses from the human small bowel: obligatory losses and the effect of physical form of food. Gut. 1988;29(6):809–15.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT. The control and consequences of bacterial fermentation in the human colon. J Appl Microbiol. 1991;70(6):443–59.Google Scholar
  70. Christensen EG, Licht TR, Leser TD, Bahl MI. Dietary xylo-oligosaccharide stimulates intestinal bifidobacteria and lactobacilli but has limited effect on intestinal integrity in rats. BMC. 2014;7(1):660.Google Scholar
  71. Inglis GD, Thomas MC, Thomas DK, Kalmokoff ML, Brooks SP, Selinger LB. Molecular methods to measure intestinal bacteria: a review. J AOAC Int. 2012;95(1):5–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Homma H, Hoy E, Xu DZ, Lu Q, Feinman R, Deitch EA. The female intestine is more resistant than the male intestine to gut injury and inflammation when subjected to conditions associated with shock states. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;288(3):G466–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Rakoff-Nahoum S, Paglino J, Eslami-Varzaneh F, Edberg S, Medzhitov R. Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell. 2004;118(2):229–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Reed KL, Fruin AB, Gower AC, Gonzales KD, Stucchi AF, Andry CD, et al. NF-kappaB activation precedes increases in mRNA encoding neurokinin-1 receptor, proinflammatory cytokines, and adhesion molecules in dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in rats. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50(12):2366–78.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Woof JM, Kerr MA. The function of immunoglobulin A in immunity. J Pathol. 2006;208(2):270–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Brenchley JM, Douek DC. Microbial translocation across the GI tract. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:149–73.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Tappenden KA, Thomson AB, Wild GA, McBurney MI. Short chain fatty acid-supplemented total parenteral nutrition enhances functional adaptation to intestinal resection in rats. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(3):792–802.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Mariadason JM, Corner GA, Augenlicht LH. Genetic reprogramming in pathways of colonic cell maturation induced by short chain fatty acids: comparison with trichostatin A, sulindac and curcumin and implications for chemoprevention of colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2000;60(16):4561–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Malloy KJ, Powrie F. Intestinal homeostasis and its breakdown in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2011;474(7351):298–306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Romagnani S. Th1/Th2 cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1999;5(4):285–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Bulek K, Swaidani S, Aronica M, Li X. Epithelium: the interplay between innate and Th2 immunity. Immunol Cell Biol. 2010;88(3):257–68.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Locati M, Allavena P, Sica A. Macrophage polarization: tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol. 2002;23(11):549–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Hardy H, Harris J, Lyon E, Beal J, Foey AD. Probiotics, prebiotics and immunomodulation of gut mucosal defences: homeostasis and immunopathology. Nutrients. 2013;5(6):1869–912.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Shastri et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement