Skip to main content
Download PDF

Sex differences in the expression of cell adhesion molecules on microvesicles derived from cultured human brain microvascular endothelial cells treated with inflammatory and thrombotic stimuli

Biology of Sex Differences volume 10, Article number: 26 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There are sex differences in risk for stroke and small vessel ischemic disease in the brain. Microvesicles (MV) derived from activated cells vary by cell of origin and the stimulus initiating their release. MV released from cells activated by inflammatory and thrombotic factors have the potential to disrupt endothelial cells of the brain microvasculature. Therefore, experiments were designed to identify sex differences in the phenotype of MV released from cultured human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMEC) in response to inflammatory and thrombotic stimuli.

Methods

Cultured HBMEC derived from 20- to 30-year-old male and female donors were treated for 20 h with medium supplemented with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα; 20 ng/ml), thrombin (THR; 2 U/ml), or vehicle (i.e., control). MV were isolated from the conditioned media by high-speed centrifugation and quantified by digital flow cytometry by labeling with fluorophore-conjugated primary antibodies against PECAM-1, integrin αvβ3, ICAM-1, E-selectin, or MCAM. In addition, temporal uptake of labeled MV into control HBMEC was examined by confocal microscopy.

Results

Under control conditions, male HBMEC released fewer MV expressing each antigen, except for PECAM-1, than female cells (P < 0.05). Neither TNFα nor THR reduced cell viability. However, TNFα induced apoptosis in female and male cells, whereas THR increased apoptosis marginally only in male cells. TNFα increased expression of all antigens tested on MV in male cells, but only increased expression of integrin αvβ3, ICAM-1, and E-selectin on MV from female cells. THR increased expression of PECAM-1, ICAM-1, and MCAM-1 on MV from male but not female cells. MV were internalized and localized to lysosomes within 90 min after their application to HBMEC.

Conclusions

There are sex differences in expression of cell adhesion molecules on MV released from HBMEC under control conditions and upon activation by TNFα or THR. MV taken up by unstimulated HBMEC may impact the integrity of the brain microvasculature and account, in part, for sex differences in vascular pathologies in the brain.

Background

Dysfunction of vascular endothelial cells (ECs) is considered an early event in the development of chronic vascular diseases [1], in acute vascular events following traumatic brain injury [2] and ischemic stroke [3], and in development of Alzheimer’s disease [4, 5]. There are sex differences in outcomes from various pathologies involving the cerebral vasculature [6,7,8,9,10]. In the brain, these vascular pathological conditions are closely associated with several endothelial processes including release of endothelium-derived microvesicles (MV) [3, 11].

MV, also referred to as microparticles, are submicron- sized membrane-encapsulated structures that are shed from the plasma membrane of activated cells and which mediate cell to cell communication by transporting cell adhesion molecules on their surface, as well as encapsulated cell proteins, DNA, RNA, enzymes, lipids, and metabolites to the target cells [12, 13]. The phenotype of MV released from activated cells contains overlapping as well as distinct protein compositions, depending upon the cell of origin as well as the stimulus which initiated their generation [14, 15]. For example, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1), integrin αvβ3, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), E-selectin, and melanoma cell adhesion molecule/cell surface glycoprotein MUC18 (MCAM) are upregulated in human cerebrovascular endothelial cells under inflammatory conditions and mediate a multi-step process resulting in transmigration of immune cells into the brain [16,17,18,19,20]. E-selectin, which is expressed specifically on activated endothelial cells, is rapidly induced and binds with low affinity to ligands on various cell types for their recruitment to sites of inflammation. PECAM-1, ICAM-1, and MCAM mediate leukocyte activation and their adhesion to vascular endothelium, integrin activation, and angiogenesis. And in the brain, integrin avβ3 anchors endothelial cells to matrix components, and to other cell types, and mediates cytoskeletal organization of cells of the blood-brain barrier [17].

In vascular diseases, activation of endothelial cells by thrombotic and inflammatory cytokines, hormones, shear, or oxidative stress induces release of endothelium- derived vasoactive factors and MV into the circulation, the amounts of which may associate with the severity of the disease [19, 21,22,23]. In vitro, activated endothelial cells also release MV with distinctive array of antigens, depending upon the particular vascular bed origin [24, 25]. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and thrombin (THR) initiate MV release through cell membrane receptors TNF receptor-1 (TNFR1) and protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1), respectively, to produce proinflammatory/procoagulant MV [26]. There are sex differences in circulating MV from healthy humans [27], in cerebrovascular function, and in stroke outcomes [28, 29]. However, little experimental evidence exists regarding sex differences in release or characterization of MV associated with the cerebral microvasculature [8, 30]. Thus, this study was designed to determine if there are sex differences (1) in viability of brain microvascular endothelial cells stimulated with inflammatory and thrombotic stimuli (TNFα and THR, respectively) and (2) in the expression of surface antigens on the MV released from the stimulated cells. Proof-of-concept experiments were performed to determine the time course of MV uptake by endothelial cells and their disposition within the cells [31].

Materials and methods

Materials, antibodies, and reagents

Human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMEC) used in these experiments were from a Caucasian male (21 years of age; cause of death—car accident; Neuromics, Edina, MN, USA: HEC02; lot HECO208032015) and a Caucasian female (26 years of age; cause of death—flail chest injury from an automobile accident; iXCells Biotechnologies, San Diego, CA, USA: 10HU-051; lot 200,139). Endothelial cell medium (ECM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), endothelial cell growth supplement (ECGS), and recombinant human TNFα were from ScienCell, Carlsbad, CA, USA. Antibiotic- antimycotic supplement, gelatin attachment factor, ProLong™ Gold cell mounting medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindol (DAPI), and phosphate- buffered saline (PBS) were from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA. Fluorescein isothiocyanate- conjugated annexin V (annexin V-FITC) and phycoerythrin (PE)- conjugated antibodies against platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1), integrin αvβ3, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), E-selectin, and melanoma cell adhesion molecule/cell surface glycoprotein MUC18 (MCAM) for digital flow cytometric analysis (FACS) were obtained from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA, and CellTiter96® cytotoxicity assay was from Promega, Madison, WI, USA. PKH67 fluorescent cell membrane dye and early endosome antigen-1 (EEA-1) mouse monoclonal antibody were from Sigma- Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, and Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA, respectively. LysoTracker™ Red (LTR) and AlexaFluor 647 goat anti-mouse secondary antibody were from Thermo Fisher Scientific.

HBMEC culture

HBMEC at passage 3 or 4 were suspended in ECM containing ECGS, antibiotic-antimycotic, and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and plated at a density of 2.5 × 103 cells/cm2 onto gelatin-coated surfaces, then incubated at 37 °C, with 5% CO2. The medium was replaced every 2 days, and the cells were used for experimentation when 90–95% confluent.

Cell viability and apoptosis assays

Cell viability was determined colorimetrically by CellTiter96® cell proliferation assay, using the dehydrogenase substrate 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium; MTS. Cells were plated into a 96-well plate, cultured to about 90% confluency, then treated with fresh medium containing either TNFα (20 ng/ml), THR (2 U/ml), or vehicle (control) for 20 h. Staurosporine (0.5 μM) was used concurrently as a positive control. Twenty microliters of MTS was then added to each well, and after 3 h at 37 °C, 490 nm absorbance of the formazan product was measured using a microplate reader (Clariostar; BMG Labtech, Cary, NC, USA). The quantity of product measured by this method is directly proportional to the number of living cells.

Apoptosis was determined by measurement of cleavage of methylcoumarin (Ac-DEVD-AMC), a fluorogenic caspase-3-specific substrate, in cell lysates after experimentation. Briefly, cells were cultured in 24-well plates, treated as described above, then rinsed with PBS, and lysed in 150 μl of CHAPS lysis buffer on ice. Fifty microliters of lysate was added to 150 μl of HEPES reaction buffer containing 10 μM (final concentration) of the substrate. After 45-min incubation at 37 °C, the liberated fluorescent product was measured at 380/465 nm using a microplate assay. Staurosporine effects in vitro are concentration-dependent; therefore, to use this agent as a positive control to assess apoptosis, the concentration was reduced to 0.1 μM [32].

Generation and characterization of MV

HBMEC were seeded into 25-cm2 flasks and cultured for 4 days. Medium was then removed, and each flask was rinsed 3 times in serum-free medium before adding culture medium containing 5% FBS with either vehicle (control), TNFα (20 ng/ml), or THR (2 U/ml). Before use, the FBS was cleared of possible MV contamination by centrifugation at 20,000×g for 30 min, followed by 0.1 μm membrane filtering. A flask containing medium without cells was also examined as a negative control.

The purpose of these experiments was to characterize antigen expression on MV derived from endothelial cell plasma membranes. Therefore, after 20-h incubation, the conditioned medium was removed and centrifuged at 2000×g for 10 min to remove cellular debris or fragments, detached, or dead cells. The supernatant was then centrifuged at 20,000×g for 30 min as described previously for plasma MV isolation [33]. The pelleted MV were suspended in serum-free medium by vortexing for 1–2 min and centrifuged at 20,000×g for 30 min. The final pellets were suspended in original volume of serum-free medium and vortexed for 1–2 min. The method of isolation was adopted from our previous publications for pelleting of larger size vesicles such as microvesicles from platelet-free plasma and cell-free urine [33,34,35].

MV in 50 μl aliquots were labeled with annexin V-FITC, paired with a PE-conjugated antibody against either PE CAM-1, integrin avβ3, ICAM-1, E-selectin, or MCAM, then quantified by FACS (FACSCanto™) with a size > 150 nm as described previously [33, 36]. The total numbers of each MV antigenic phenotype per flask of conditioned medium were determined. The fold increase in number above control (unstimulated) conditions was determined for each adhesion molecule and stimulus.

MV uptake into HBMEC

MV derived from untreated female cells were isolated as described above and quantified by FACS for total PECAM-1/annexin V-positive vesicles, then labeled with PKH67, a green fluorescent cell membrane marker, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The MV (1000 MV/μl final concentration) were then applied to confluent, previously unstimulated female cells cultured on glass cover-slips for 30 min, 90 min, or 20 h. Non- MV-treated cells served as a control. At each time point, duplicate cover-slips were rinsed in fresh medium then the adhered cells were labeled with markers for intracellular structures. First, LTR (50 nM final concentration), to label lysosomes, was applied for 30 min. Then, after rinsing, the cells were fixed for 10 min in 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min. After rinsing again in PBS, the cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with EEA-1 mouse monoclonal antibody to label early endosomes. After rinsing, Alexa Fluor 647 secondary antibody was applied for 1 h. Finally, the samples were rinsed, then mounted on glass slides, using mounting medium containing DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) to label nuclei. Specimens were examined using a Zeiss LSM780 confocal laser- scanning microscope fitted with a Zeiss 63X water- immersion lens. For each random field examined, 12 optical slices were collected and used to generate a maximum intensity projection for analysis. All images were collected using sequential scanning of individual fluorescence channels, to reduce the likelihood of false co-labeling.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of 4 or 5 experiments for each study. Differences between treatments of the same donor cells were examined using the two-tailed paired t test, and differences between male and female cells for each parameter were examined using the two-sample t test with equal variance. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Results

Treatment effects on cell viability and apoptosis

MV were not detected in culture medium without cells. Under the conditions used to generate MV, neither TNFα nor THR treatments altered cell viability compared to vehicle-treated cells, although viability was significantly reduced by staurosporine, a positive control (Fig. 1, upper panel). Apoptosis, measured by cleavage of the caspase- 3-specific substrate Ac-DEVD-AMC, was significantly increased by treatment with TNFα in male and female cells, but the increase was greater in male compared to female cells (Fig. 1, lower panel). Treatment with THR modestly increased caspase-3 activity in male cells. Staurosporine significantly increased caspase-3 activity in both male and female cells (Fig. 1, lower panel).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Cell viability (upper panel) determined by analysis of dehydrogenases of metabolically active cells and apoptosis (lower panel) defined by cleavage of the caspase-3-specific substrate Ac-DEVD-AMC in HBMEC under unstimulated conditions (control) or following treatment with TNFα (20 ng/ml), THR (2 U/ml), or staurosporine (Staur), as a positive control (0.5 μM for upper panel and 0.1 μM for lower panel) for 20 h. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05: vs same sex untreated, controlled cells, by paired t test; †, vs same parameter in male cells, by two-tailed t test. N = 4 for each condition

Full size image

Characterization of MV

Representative FACS analysis of fluorescence dot plots of PECAM-1-expressing MV released from male HBMEC under control, unstimulated conditions and following stimulation with TNFα (20 ng/ml) for 20 h is shown in Fig. 2. The total number of each MV phenotype under control conditions ranged from 4.0 ± 1.0 to 15.5 ± 1.1 × 103 in media conditioned by male cells and from 12.4 ± 2.9 to 73.1 ± 6.9 × 103 in media conditioned by female cells. Under control conditions, male HBMEC released fewer antigen- positive MV than did female cells, with the exception of PECAM-1-positive MV which were similar in both groups (Fig. 3). In media conditioned by male cells, there was a significant fold increase above control conditions in MV expressing each of the antigens following treatment with TNFα, and in media conditioned by female cells, increases were observed for all antigen phenotypes, except E-selectin (Fig. 4). Further, fold increase in MV positive for all antigens was greater in media conditioned by male compared to female cells following treatment with TNFα (Fig. 4). THR treatment increased MV expressing PECAM-1, ICAM-1, and MCAM in media conditioned by male cells, but was without effect on female cells (Fig. 4). In addition, the fold increase in MV expressing ICAM-1 and MCAM was greater in media conditioned from male compared to female THR-treated cells (Fig. 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

An example of a light scatter plot (a) and fluorescence dot plots (b–g) derived from the microvesicle (0.2–1 μm size) gate of the digital flow cytometer analysis of cell-free culture media from TNFα (20 ng/ml) stimulated HBMEC for 20 h. The size gates were determined based on calibration size (0.2–2 μm) beads and with truCOUNT™ (4.2 μm size) beads (a). The positive and negative counts of microvesicles were separated by fluorescence dot plots derived from microvesicle gate of scatter plot of phycoerythrin- and fluorescein (FITC)-conjugated isotype control antibodies (b) and selected candidate cell membrane marker antibodies (c, PECAM-1; d, Integrin α˅β3; e, ICAM-1; f, E-selectin) plus recombinant annexin-V for surface phosphatidylserine and MCAM plus VE-cadherin (f) antibodies stained microvesicles. The example separation of single (+/− (Q1) or −/+ (Q4)), double (+/+ (Q2)) marker positive, and both marker negative (−/− (Q3)) microvesicles is shown in c

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Total numbers of each MV phenotype in conditioned media from cultured male (left panel) and female (right panel) HBMEC treated for 20 h with medium without stimulant and used for baseline control values. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 4–5 experiments per each condition) of total MV in conditioned media. †, P < 0.05, different from media conditioned by male cells

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Fold increase in release of MV from male (open bars) and female (black bars) HBMEC expressing cell adhesion molecules following stimulation with either TNFα (20 ng/ml) or THR (2 U/ml) for 20 h. Data are shown as mean ± SEM fold increase above the number of MV expressed under unstimulated (control) conditions from 4 to 5 separate sets of experiments per condition. *P < 0.05 vs same sex untreated cells, by paired t test; †, vs same parameter in male cells, by two-tailed t test

Full size image

Uptake of MV into HBMEC

Following the 30-min incubation period with PKH67- labeled MV derived from untreated female donor HBMEC, sparse cytoplasmic punctate structures which labeled positively for PKH67 (green) were observed within the treated cells. Co-labeling of PKH67 with the early endosome (EEA-1, cyan) or lysosome (LTR, red) markers was absent (Fig. 5a). PKH67 labeling within the treated cells increased after 90 min and was almost entirely co-localized with lysosomes, indicated by yellow staining. Except for DAPI (blue), all labeling was markedly reduced after exposure to the labeled MV for 20 h. Co-localization of MV with the early endosome label was absent at all time points.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Confocal micrographs of internalization of MV derived from unstimulated HBMEC by sex-matched unstimulated HBMEC. MV generated from female donor cells were first labeled with PKH67 (green), then rinsed and applied to naïve female recipient cells for various time intervals; non-MV-treated cells served as controls. At each time point, 30 min, 90 min, or 20 h, paired sets of control and MV-exposed cells were rinsed to remove non-internalized MV and labeled with markers for (1) early endosome antigen-1 (EEA-1) conjugated with IgG/AlexaFluor 647 IgG (cyan), (2) lysosomes [LysoTracker™ (red)], and (3) nuclei [DAPI (blue)] as described in the “Materials and methods” section. a Merged maximal intensity projections of cells not treated (0 min) or treated with PKH67-labeled MV for 30 min, 90 min, or 20 h. Sparse PKH67-positive punctate structures were present in the cytoplasm 30 min after MV application and were increased in number after 90 min, most of which were co-labeled for lysosomes (yellow). MV labeling was reduced at 20 h. Co-localization of MV/early endosome labels was absent at all time points examined. b The image of the 90-min MV-treated cells (above) was used to substantiate accurate assessment of localization of each fluorescent marker. Images obtained by sequential scanning of individual channels for PKH67, EEA-1, and LTR are shown, together with the resulting merged image which also includes the DAPI channel. The region bounded by white box in the merged image from 90 min was enlarged (c), and a representative fluorescence intensity profile along the dashed line encompassing labeled cytoplasmic structures showed overlapping signals for PKH67 with LTR, but not with early endosomes (d). White bars, 5 μm; except in c, 1 μm

Full size image

In other experiments, cells were incubated with labeled MV for 90 min to substantiate the methodology used to identify cellular localization of the fluorophores. After incubation, the cells were imaged as described above, then the individual maximal intensity projections obtained in each fluorescent channel were compared, which showed similar labeling patterns for PKH67 together with LTR, but not with EEA-1 IgG/AlexaFluor 647 IgG (Fig. 5b). These results were reinforced by analysis of the corresponding merged image of all channels, using line fluorescence intensity profiles of cell structures encompassing all labels (Fig. 5c) which demonstrated that MV labeling was co-localized with lysosomes, but not with early endosomes (Fig. 5d).

Discussion

Results of this study demonstrate that there were no differences in cell viability but there were distinct sex differences in adhesion molecules expressed on MV released from cultured HBMEC in response to inflammatory and thrombotic stimuli. The experimental conditions used to generate MV in this study resulted in specific patterns of cellular activation to each stimulus, an observation that is consistent with previous findings [24, 25, 37]. Although neither TNFα nor THR treatment changed cell viability, these inflammatory and thrombotic stimuli caused modest increases in cell caspase-3 activity indicating that a small proportion of the cells were in the early stages of apoptosis. The larger increase in apoptosis observed in male compared to female cells in response to TNFα is consistent with other observations of divergent cellular pathways associated with cell survival in stroke [6, 38].

MV were recovered in medium from untreated cells, most likely indicating spontaneous release of MV during cellular homeostatic processes and is consistent with detection of the presence of low number of endothelium-derived MV in the circulation of healthy humans [27]. Except for PECAM-1, under control condition, there were greater numbers of MV in conditioned media derived from female than from male cells, perhaps reflecting differences in glycocalyx structure or cellular metabolism [39, 40].

Sex differences in MV phenotypes were also observed following stimulation with TNFα and THR. Treatment of male donor cells with TNFα increased expression of cell adhesion molecules on the released MV, with the fold increase being the greatest in ICAM-1 and E-selectin phenotypes. A similar pattern for ICAM-1 and E-selectin MV was observed in female-derived MV, although the sensitivity to TNFα was markedly reduced compared to that of male cells. Among the cellular adhesion molecules examined, ICAM-1 and E-selectin are inducible molecules, which are upregulated within several hours in brain microvascular endothelial cells activated by cytokines, lipopolysaccharide, and thrombin in vitro [24, 25, 37, 41, 42]. In the present study, THR treatment increased expression of ICAM-1, PECAM-1, and MCAM on MV from male cells, although in numbers substantially lower than following treatment with TNFα. In contrast, THR treatment was ineffective in altering MV release from female cells. Thrombin increases release of nitric oxide and other endothelium- derived factors from endothelial cells [43,44,45]. However, relationships among release of endothelium-derived vasoactive factors and formation and release of MV are unclear.

Confocal microscopy showed that MV applied to otherwise untreated cells are internalized within 30 min. Co-localization of MV labeled with the EEA-1 antibody, which identifies early endosomes, was not observed, suggesting that the MV were within endocytotic vesicles at this time point. However, by 90 min, MV-positive compartments within the cytoplasm increased in number, almost all of which were localized to lysosomes. These results demonstrate that the MV were internalized by HBMEC and trafficked to lysosomes which were degraded by 20 h. The internalization of MV formed by autologous cells, that is, the cell of origin, in response to cell stimulation remains to be determined.

Taken together, these findings provide insight into sex differences in MV formation in HBMEC under basal and stimulated conditions. The inducible molecules ICAM-1 and E-selectin, which are principal effectors of leukocyte recruitment and trafficking into the brain, were the most responsive MV antigens and predominated in male cells [18]. All adhesion molecules examined in this study have been associated with pathological conditions which promote deficiencies in the brain microvasculature including the blood-brain barrier [17,18,19,20]. The present results are consistent with a regulatory function for MV derived from the human brain microvasculature in inflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders, traumatic brain injury, and stroke and suggest that they may be partly responsible for sex-specific differences observed in these pathologies.

This study has several limitations. The male and female brain microvascular cells used in these experiments were purchased from two different companies. To control against batch to batch variability and suppliers, all experiments for this study were conducted on cells from the same sources of male and female cells. The donors were of similar age and their death an immediate result of an automobile accident, and not a chronic illness, suggesting that the donors had been in good health. It is recognized that culture conditions such as media and flask/slide material can affect the outcome of these types of experiments. All experiments were performed in media that was not stripped of hormones so as to maintain the cultures. Thus, how the generation of MV might be affected by specific sex steroid hormones in female and male cells is open to investigation. However, given these limitations and under standardized experimental conditions, the results point to sex differences in generation of MV in response to inflammatory stimuli. These differences in responsiveness between male and female endothelial cells could contribute to changes in integrity of the brain microvasculature associated with sex differences in outcomes of stroke and perhaps processes associated with cognitive decline.

Conclusions

The expression of cell adhesion molecules on human brain microvascular endothelium-derived MV under the control, unstimulated conditions and during activation by TNFα or THR differs by the sex of the microvascular endothelial cells. MV have the capacity to modulate the function of other cells potentially impacting immune cell adhesion and migration, or barrier competency; thus, these differences in MV phenotypes may account, in part, for sex differences in vascular pathologies involving the brain, as well as in normal vascular development and aging. The findings also underscore the appropriateness of identifying the sex of cells used in research studies of MV disposition within the vasculature, as well as the sex of cells used to generate MV for in vitro studies. Future studies are needed to determine how sex hormones affect the release of MV from these cells.

References

  1. Vanhoutte PM, Shimokawa H, Feletou M, Tang EH. Endothelial dysfunction and vascular disease - a 30th anniversary update. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2017;219(1):22–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. van Ierssel SH, Conraads VM, Van Craenenbroeck EM, Liu Y, Maas AI, Parizel PM, et al. Endothelial dysfunction in acute brain injury and the development of cerebral ischemia. J Neurosci Res. 2015;93(6):866–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cherian P, Hankey GJ, Eikelboom JW, Thom J, Baker RI, McQuillan A, et al. Endothelial and platelet activation in acute ischemic stroke and its etiological subtypes. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2132–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xue S, Cai X, Li W, Zhang Z, Dong W, Hui G. Elevated plasma endothelial microparticles in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;34(3–4):174–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Erickson MA, Banks WA. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction as a cause and consequence of Alzheimer’s disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(10):1500–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chauhan A, Moser H, McCullough LD. Sex differences in ischaemic stroke: potential cellular mechanisms. Clin Sci (Lond). 2017;131(7):533–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bakker SL, de Leeuw FE, den Heijer T, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Breteler MM. Cerebral haemodynamics in the elderly: the Rotterdam study. Neuroepidemiology. 2004;23(4):178–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller VM, Garovic VD, Kantarci K, Barnes JN, Jayachandran M, Mielke MM, et al. Sex-specific risk of cardiovascular disease and cognitive decline: pregnancy and menopause. Biol Sex Differ. 2013;4(1):6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mielke MM, Milic NM, Weissgerber TL, White WM, Kantarci K, Mosley TH, et al. Impaired cognition and brain atrophy decades after hypertensive pregnancy disorders. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9(2 Suppl 1):S70–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Raman MR, Tosakulwong N, Zuk SM, Senjem ML, White WM, Fields JA, et al. Influence of preeclampsia and late-life hypertension on MRI measures of cortical atrophy. J Hypertens. 2017;35(12):2479–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ueno M, Chiba Y, Matsumoto K, Murakami R, Fujihara R, Kawauchi M, et al. Blood-brain barrier damage in vascular dementia. Neuropathology. 2016;36(2):115–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burger D, Montezano AC, Nishigaki N, He Y, Carter A, Touyz RM. Endothelial microparticle formation by angiotensin II is mediated via Ang II receptor type I/NADPH oxidase/rho kinase pathways targeted to lipid rafts. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(8):1898–907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto S, Niida S, Azuma E, Yanagibashi T, Muramatsu M, Huang TT, et al. Inflammation-induced endothelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles modulate the cellular status of pericytes. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Peterson DB, Sander T, Kaul S, Wakim BT, Halligan B, Twigger S, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of PAI-1 and TNF-alpha-derived endothelial microparticles. Proteomics. 2008;8:2430–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller VM, Lahr BD, Bailey KR, Hodis HN, Mulvagh SL, Jayachandran M. Specific cell-derived microvesicles: linking endothelial function to carotid artery intima-media thickness in low cardiovascular risk menopausal women. Atherosclerosis. 2016;246:21–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cengiz N, Eroduan E, Ozbek H, Tuncer M. Adhesion molecules in cerebral ischemia and atherosclerosis. Eur J General Medicine. 2009;6:249–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimamura N, Matchett G, Solaroglu I, Tsubokawa T, Ohkuma H, Zhang J. Inhibition of integrin alphavbeta3 reduces blood-brain barrier breakdown in focal ischemia in rats. J Neurosci Res. 2006;84(8):1837–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roe K, Orillo B, Verma S. West Nile virus-induced cell adhesion molecules on human brain microvascular endothelial cells regulate leukocyte adhesion and modulate permeability of the in vitro blood-brain barrier model. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brogan PA, Shah V, Brachet C, Harnden A, Mant D, Klein N, et al. Endothelial and platelet microparticles in vasculitis of the young. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(3):927–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Larochelle C, Cayrol R, Kebir H, Alvarez JI, Lecuyer MA, Ifergan I, et al. Melanoma cell adhesion molecule identifies encephalitogenic T lymphocytes and promotes their recruitment to the central nervous system. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 10:2906–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amabile N, Heiss C, Real WM, Minasi P, McGlothlin D, Rame EJ, et al. Circulating endothelial microparticle levels predict hemodynamic severity of pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(11):1268–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Preston RA, Jy W, Jimenez JJ, Mauro LM, Horstman LL, Valle M, et al. Effects of severe hypertension on endothelial and platelet microparticles. Hypertension. 2003;41(2):211–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Simak J, Gelderman MP, Yu H, Wright V, Baird AE. Circulating endothelial microparticles in acute ischemic stroke: a link to severity, lesion volume and outcome. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(6):1296–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jimenez JJ, Jy W, Mauro LM, Soderland C, Horstman LL, Ahn YS. Endothelial cells release phenotypically and quantitatively distinct microparticles in activation and apoptosis. Thromb Res. 2003;109(4):175–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Takahashi T, Kobayashi S, Fujino N, Suzuki T, Ota C, Tando Y, et al. Differences in the released endothelial microparticle subtypes between human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells and aortic endothelial cells in vitro. Exp Lung Res. 2013;39(4–5):155–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Curtis AM, Edelberg J, Jonas R, Rogers WT, Moore JS, Syed W, et al. Endothelial microparticles: sophisticated vesicles modulating vascular function. Vasc Med. 2013;18(4):204–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gustafson CM, Shepherd AJ, Miller VM, Jayachandran M. Age- and sex-specific differences in blood-borne microvesicles from apparently healthy humans. Biol Sex Differ. 2015;6:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Haast RA, Gustafson DR, Kiliaan AJ. Sex differences in stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32(12):2100–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gargano JW, Reeves MJ. Sex differences in stroke recovery and stroke-specific quality of life: results from a statewide stroke registry. Stroke. 2007;38(9):2541–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Markiewicz M, Richard E, Marks N, Ludwicka-Bradley A. Impact of endothelial microparticles on coagulation, inflammation, and angiogenesis in age-related vascular diseases. J Aging Res. 2013;2013:734509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ayers L, Nieuwland R, Kohler M, Kraenkel N, Ferry B, Leeson P. Dynamic microvesicle release and clearance within the cardiovascular system: triggers and mechanisms. Clin Sci. 2015;129(11):915–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Antonsson A, Persson JL. Induction of apoptosis by staurosporine involves the inhibition of expression of the major cell cycle proteins at the G(2)/m checkpoint accompanied by alterations in Erk and Akt kinase activities. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(8):2893–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jayachandran M, Miller VM, Heit JA, Owen WG. Methodology for isolation, identification and characterization of microvesicles in peripheral blood. J Immunol Methods. 2012;375(1–2):207–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jayachandran M, Lugo G, Heiling H, Miller VM, Rule AD, Lieske JC. Extracellular vesicles in urine of women with but not without kidney stones manifest patterns similar to men: a case control study. Biol Sex Differ. 2015;6:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jayachandran M, Litwiller RD, Owen WG, Heit JA, Behrenbeck T, Mulvagh SL, et al. Characterization of blood borne microparticles as markers of premature coronary calcification in newly menopausal women. AmJPhysiol(Heart CircPhysiol42). 2008;295(3):H931–H8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Miller VM, Lahr BD, Bailey KR, Heit JA, Harman SM, Jayachandran M. Longitudinal effects of menopausal hormone treatments on platelet characteristics and cell-derived microvesicles. Platelets. 2016;27(1):32–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Alabanza LM, Bynoe MS. Thrombin induces an inflammatory phenotype in a human brain endothelial cell line. J Neuroimmunol. 2012;245(1–2):48–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yuan M, Siegel C, Zeng Z, Li J, Liu F, McCullough LD. Sex differences in the response to activation of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase pathway after experimental stroke. Exp Neurol. 2009;217(1):210–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Solbu MD, Kolset SO, Jenssen TG, Wilsgaard T, Lochen ML, Mathiesen EB, et al. Gender differences in the association of syndecan-4 with myocardial infarction: the population-based Tromsø Study. Atherosclerosis. 2018;278:166–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Huxley VH, Kemp SS. Sex-specific characteristics of the microcirculation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1065:307–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wong D, Dorovini-Zis K. Upregulation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression in primary cultures of human brain microvessel endothelial cells by cytokines and lipopolysaccharide. J Neuroimmunol. 1992;39(1–2):11–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wong D, Dorovini-Zis K. Regulation by cytokines and lipopolysaccharide of E-selectin expression by human brain microvessel endothelial cells in primary culture. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1996;55(2):225–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hamilton JR, Cocks TM. Heterogeneous mechanisms of endothelium-dependent relaxations for thrombin and peptide activators of protease-activated receptor-1 in porcine isolated coronary artery. BrJPharmacol. 2000;130:181–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lewis DA, Avsar M, Labreche P, Bracamonte M, Jayachandran M, Miller VM. Treatment with raloxifene and 17beta-estradiol differentially modulates nitric oxide and prostanoids in venous endothelium and platelets of ovariectomized pigs. JCardiovascPharmacol. 2006;48(5):231–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Arnal JF, Dinh-Xuan AT, Pueyo M, Darblade B, Rami J. Endothelium-derived nitric oxide and vascular physiology and pathology. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999;55(8–9):1078–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This work was supported by NIH grant NIH P50 AG44170 and the Mayo Foundation.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the findings of our manuscript are available for review by emailing the corresponding author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Medical Science Bldg. 4-20, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Larry W. Hunter, Muthuvel Jayachandran & Virginia M. Miller

  2. Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Muthuvel Jayachandran & Virginia M. Miller

  3. Divisions of Hematology Research and Nephrology and Hypertension Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Muthuvel Jayachandran

  4. Women’s Health Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Virginia M. Miller

Authors
  1. Larry W. Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muthuvel Jayachandran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Virginia M. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

VM conceived the study; helped in the design, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and revised the manuscript. LH designed the study elements, carried out the experimentation, performed the data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. MJ helped in the analysis and interpretation of the data and edited the manuscript. All authors read, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia M. Miller.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hunter, L.W., Jayachandran, M. & Miller, V.M. Sex differences in the expression of cell adhesion molecules on microvesicles derived from cultured human brain microvascular endothelial cells treated with inflammatory and thrombotic stimuli. Biol Sex Differ 10, 26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-019-0241-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-019-0241-y

Keywords

Biology of Sex Differences

ISSN: 2042-6410

Contact us