Skip to main content
Download PDF

Sex differences in symptoms following the administration of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in children below 5 years of age in Germany (CoVacU5): a retrospective cohort study

Biology of Sex Differences volume 15, Article number: 74 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sex differences exist not only in the efficacy but also in adverse event rates of many vaccines. Here we compared the safety of BNT162b2 vaccine administered off-label in female and male children younger than 5 years in Germany.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study, in which we performed a post-hoc analysis of a dataset collected through an authentication-based survey of individuals having registered children aged 0-<5 years for vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in six private practices and/or two lay person-initiated vaccination campaigns. We analyzed the safety profiles of the first 3 doses of 3–10 µg BNT162b2. Primary outcome was comparison in frequencies of 4 common post-vaccination symptom categories such as local, general, musculoskeletal symptoms and fever. Data were analyzed according to sex in bivariate analyses and regression models adjusting for age, weight, and dosage. Interaction between sex and BNT162b2 dosage was assessed. An active-comparator analysis was applied to compare post-vaccination symptoms after BNT162b2 versus non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Results

The dataset for the present analysis consisted of 7801 participants including 3842 females (49%) and 3977 males (51%) with an age of 3 years (median, interquartile: 2 years). Among individuals receiving 3 µg BNT162b2, no sex differences were noted, but after a first dose of 5–10 µg BNT162b2, local injection-site symptoms were more prevalent in girls compared to boys. In logistic regression, female sex was associated with higher odds of local symptoms, odds ratio (OR) of 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15–1.55, p < 0.05) and general symptoms with OR 1.21 (95% CI: 1.01–1.44, p < 0.05). Following non-BNT162b2 childhood vaccinations, female sex was associated with a lower odds of post-vaccination musculoskeletal symptoms (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11–0.82, p < 0.05). An active comparator analysis between BNT162b2 and non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations revealed that female sex positively influenced the association between BNT162b2 vaccine type and musculoskeletal symptoms.

Conclusions

Sex differences exist in post-vaccination symptoms after BNT162b2 administration even in young children. These are of importance for the conception of approval studies, for post-vaccination monitoring and for future vaccination strategies (German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00028759).

Plain English summary

For many childhood vaccines, the immune responses are different between the sexes. For the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2, the symptoms occurring after vaccination in children have not sufficiently been investigated. In this study, we performed an analysis of a dataset of retrospectively collected information on symptoms occurring after vaccinations with BNT162b2 and regular childhood vaccines in 7801 children under the age of 5 years in Germany, with a focus on the sex differences. Among the four categories assessed, local injection-site and general symptoms were more frequent in girls compared to boys. In contrast, following the administration of other childhood vaccines, the caregivers more frequently reported muscle-related symptoms in boys than in girls. In conclusion, sex differences exist in symptoms occurring after vaccinations even in young children, which is important to consider for future studies evaluating vaccine safety.

Registration

The present work was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00028759.

Highlights

Data on mRNA vaccine safety are abundant, but few studies have investigated children aged under 5 years.

The CoVacU5 study was a retrospective cohort of off-label vaccinations with BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in Germany, from which we here present a detailed sex-disaggregated reanalysis of post-vaccination symptoms in 7801 children.

Females were more likely than males to experience local injection-site or general symptoms after being administered BNT162b2.

Implications of the present data highlight the importance to assess the sex differences in future mRNA vaccine licensure studies and post-vaccination monitoring.

Introduction

Biological sex introduces a variability in immune responses, and this is therefore pertinent to sex-specific reactions of adaptive immune system following vaccination [1, 2]. As a consequence, the humoral immune responses of vaccines in humans and in experimental models are more pronounced in females than males as reported for the vaccines against influenza [3, 4], hepatitis A or dengue virus [2]. The potential underlying mechanisms have been attributed to the immunosuppressive effect of male sex hormones [5, 6]. In contrast, several observations favor that some vaccines have increased efficacy against infection in men [2, 7,8,9].

Along with the reported sex differences in vaccination efficacy, a plethora of data has revealed sex differences in the rates of adverse events post vaccination [10]. For instance, anaphylaxis is reported to be 4 times more frequent in females than in males [8, 11]. In the case of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines it is opposite, individual undesired sequelae such as myocarditis are more frequently observed in males [12]. However, symptomatic presentation post SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is dominated by reports of females [13,14,15]. In support, vaccine monitoring data and pooled analyses of cross-sectional studies revealed a higher probability of adverse effects in women after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (Comirnaty®) [16, 17]. However, further studies are warranted to understand the outcome post SARS-CoV2 vaccination and more studies that disaggregate data by sex are needed [13].

A population that was the last to become eligible for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were young children. We have previously reported on the overall safety and effectiveness of BNT162b2 in the retrospective CoVacU5 cohort of children vaccinated off-label in Germany [18, 19]. Such inclusion and assessment represented a unique opportunity to detect otherwise inaccessible dose-response relationships in post-vaccination symptoms.

Even if female sex in adulthood is associated with more frequent adverse events after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination [20], nothing is known in young children. We hypothesized that female sex would be associated with a greater odds of experiencing adverse symptoms after BNT162b2 vaccination in young children, and that sex-specific effects may be dependent on dose.

To test this hypothesis, we aimed to compare 4 common post-vaccination symptom categories such as local, general, musculoskeletal symptoms and fever after BNT162b2 vaccination in children of both sexes younger than 5 years of age, and we aimed to determine if the safety profile was dependent on the dose of BNT162b administered.

Methods

Study design

The present study was a post-hoc analysis of the CoVacU5 study. The CoVacU5 study was a retrospective cohort study that assessed symptoms occurring after vaccination with BNT162b2 in children aged less than 5 years old.

Participants

Participants of the CoVacU5 study were recruited through e-mail addresses of the vaccination registration databases of 21 healthcare institutions and two German vaccination promotion programs “Bildung Aber Sicher” and “U12Schutz”. Inclusion criteria for respondents of the CoVacU5 study survey were having registered a child younger than 5 years old for off-label vaccination with BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and informed consent of parent or guardian. Exclusion criteria were duplicate entries that had overlaps in all of the four variables age, sex, weight and height, unless the duplicate entry was explained as twins or triplets. Respondents without a correct invitation code were excluded. SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations that were administered before May 2021 or administered using vaccines other than BNT162b2 were also excluded.

Study procedure

The original survey was available on a web-based REDCap platform [21] from April 15th to May 9th 2022. The survey procedure was pseudonymized and restricted to invited participants providing an authentication code, as previously described [18]. In brief, all eligible potential participants were recruited via the e-mail addresses by which they had previously registered a child aged less than 5 years old for a vaccination with BNT162b2. The invitation e-mails were sent out twice to the eligible individuals, containing an individual access code to allow pseudonymized but authentication-based survey participation only.

The vaccinations with BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine had previously been administered off-label following German law and outside of any study protocol. In addition, the physicians responsible for each vaccinating site were mandated by German law to report each unexpected or severe side effect to the authorities as part of routine medical care.

The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and is reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline for observational studies. The study protocol was assessed and approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Rostock, Germany (ID: A 2022-0065). The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00028759).

Variables

The survey included close-ended questions gathered demographic information, basic medical data, and timing and dosage of vaccinations with BNT162b2, and all non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in the three months preceding the first BNT162b2 administration. Next, questions covered post-vaccination symptoms occurring after BNT162b2 or non-SARS SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in 9 symptom categories with close-ended and open-ended follow-up questions to narrow down the characteristics of each individual symptom as described in the initial CoVacU5 study [18].

Outcomes

The primary outcome of this post-hoc analysis was the sex-specific frequency of symptoms within the four categories of local reaction (injection site), general symptoms (e.g. fatigue, feeling of weakness, general feeling of illness), musculoskeletal symptoms and fever that occurred after first, second and/or third vaccinations with BNT162b2, further stratified by age group and dosage. As secondary analyses, we tested whether an interaction between sex and BNT162b2 dosage was present in association with the primary outcome. Next, we investigated symptoms occurring after non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, and we analyzed symptoms post-BNT162b2 administration in comparison with those occurring after non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administration in the period between January 15th, 2022 and May 9th, 2022.

Statistical analysis

No power analysis was performed for this study. Analyses were conducted using STATA version 15 and MATLAB R2020a. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact or Chi-Square test. Continuous variables were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Logistic regression models were used with the four symptoms categories as dependent variables, sex and BNT162b2 vaccine dosage as predictors of interest, and age, height and weight as a priori confounders. Next, sex and dosage were introduced as an interaction term in the models above, and the models with versus without the interaction term were compared using Likelihood Ratio tests. For analyses of non-BNT162b2 vaccines, dosage variable was not included in the models. For the active-comparator analysis comparing post-BNT162b2 symptoms with those occurring after non-BNT162b2 vaccines, we used logistic regression models as above but included vaccine type “BNT162b2” vs. “non-BNT162b2” as a predictor variable. For both bivariate and regression analyses, all p values and 95% confidence intervals underwent adjustment for multiple testing of 4 symptom categories by the Bonferroni method. Statistical significance was assumed at an adjusted p < 0.05.

Results

Study population

The present analysis included 7801 participants comprising 3842 girls (49%) and 3977 boys (51%) aged 3 years (median, interquartile: 2 years) at the time when receiving their first vaccination with BNT162b2. Demographics, health-related information of participants and the dosage of administered BNT162b2 mRNA vaccines are displayed as sex-disaggregated data in Table 1. The age, height, weight, the chosen BNT162b2 doses, and the fraction of children with comorbidities or long-term medication were similar between the sexes.

Table 1 Sample characteristics, n/N(%)
Full size table

Sex-stratified occurrence of post-vaccination symptoms reported after BNT162b2 administration

We assessed the most frequently reported symptom categories of the original CoVacU5 study [18] with sex stratification. The sex-stratified occurrence of local injection site, general, musculoskeletal symptoms and fever after the first administration of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine are shown in Fig. 1. Similarly, symptom categories reported to occur after second or third administration of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine are shown in Fig. 1 and Supplemental Table 1, respectively. The frequency of local injection-site reactions was higher in girls than in boys, and higher at the dose of 10 µg BNT162b2. However, there was no significant difference in frequencies between sexes or doses for general, musculoskeletal symptoms and fever after BNT162b2 administration. The underlying numerical data are shown in Supplemental Table 1. Overall, descriptive analysis suggested specific sex differences in post-BNT162b2 symptoms.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sex-stratified occurrence of local, general, musculoskeletal symptoms and fever after the first and second administration of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine

Full size image

In logistic regression models adjusted for age, weight and height, female sex was associated with occurrence of local symptoms after BNT162b2 administration (OR: 1.33 [95% CI: 1.15;1.55]). (Table 2) Similarly, female sex was associated with occurrence of general symptoms after BNT162b2 administration (OR: 1.21 [95% CI: 1.01;1.44]). There were no associations between sex and fever or musculoskeletal symptoms (Table 2). The sex-stratified analyses captured associations between BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine dosage and symptoms observed in all symptoms categories (Fig. 1; Table 2). However, we found no significant interactions between sex and dosage for symptoms occurring post BNT162b2 vaccination (Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariable logistic regression of post-BNT162b2 symptoms, OR (95% CI)
Full size table

Sex-specific symptoms occurring after non-BNT162b2 vaccine administration

As a next step, we tested whether a sex effect was present in symptoms occurring after any on-label administration of non-BNT162b2 vaccinations against viruses and bacteria that were performed in the three months prior to a BNT162b2 vaccination, as shown in Supplementary Table 2. In logistic regression models, we found that fever, general or local symptoms were sex-independent (Table 3). However, female sex was negatively associated with musculoskeletal symptoms after non-BNT162b2 vaccine administration (OR: 0.29 [95% CI: 0.11;0.82]). These data indicate that after on-label childhood vaccines, most symptoms categories except musculoskeletal symptoms were not associated with biological sex.

Table 3 Multivariable logistic regression of post-Non-BNT162b2 symptoms, OR (95% CI)
Full size table

Active comparator analysis of symptoms occurring after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine versus other vaccine administration in the same population

Further, we aimed to compare the symptoms occurring in a cohort of 4570 children who had received at least one BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine within the last 3 months with those occurring in 1473 individuals of the same population after receiving the non-BNT162b2 vaccinations listed in Supplementary Table 2. Using logistic regression analysis of all vaccinations combined and adjusting for age, weight and height, we found that BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was associated with higher odds of symptoms of the local injection-site and the musculoskeletal category, but at lower odds of general symptoms or fever (Table 4). In this analysis, female sex was associated with increased odds of post-vaccination local symptoms (OR: 1.35 [95% CI: 1.17–1.56], p < 0.05) but not with any of the other three symptoms categories (Table 4). Secondary analyses revealed an interaction between vaccine type and sex for the musculoskeletal category only (interaction BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and female sex: OR 4.01 [95% CI: 1.01;16.02], Likelihood ratio test p = 0.021), (current Table 5; final Table 4). Overall, these results indicate that few post-vaccination symptoms showed an association with sex in the combined dataset of BNT162b2 and non-BNT162b2 vaccination, with the exception that after non-BNT162b2 vaccinations the probability of musculoskeletal symptoms was negatively affected by female sex.

Table 4 Comparison of symptoms occurring after BNT162b2 and after non-BNT162b2 vaccinations
Full size table

Discussion

Principal findings

In the present study, we investigated the sex differences in post-vaccination symptoms in young children using a large retrospective cohort including COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 vaccinations in Germany. Our study supports the notion that biological sex plays an important role in the presentation of post-vaccination symptoms. The study findings demonstrate that post-vaccination symptoms predominantly occur in female children even at very young age far before puberty. Our main findings were that (i) female sex was significantly associated with occurrence of local symptoms and general symptoms after BNT162b2 administration. (ii) Female sex was associated with increased odds of post-vaccination local symptoms among all vaccinations, regardless of type. (iii) Female sex was associated with lower odds of musculoskeletal symptoms occurring after non- BNT162b2 childhood vaccine administration.

The increased probability of local injection-site symptoms in female compared to male sex after any type of vaccination in this pediatric population is in accordance with previous reports on various vaccines [22, 23]. The current BNT162b2 assessment in young children is important as previous reports on safety of BNT162b2 administration in this age group either did not stratify for sex [18, 24, 25] or found no sex differences [26].

Study interpretation

The mechanism underlying the increased odds of local and general symptoms in young girls receiving BNT162b2 is not clear. For vaccination in general, such a sex difference is suspected to be multifactorial and related to pain sensitivity, hypersensitivity reactions or most likely hormonal factors [22]. The observed sex difference for BNT162b2 may also be in part attributable to the innate immune system, as females are known to have stronger innate immune responses than males, sometimes with non-specific adverse vaccine effects [27,28,29]. For instance, in experimental data BNT162b2 stimulates interferon-α/MDA5 signaling, although sex differences in this process are not known and should be further investigated [30]. By contrast, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein stimulates Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR 4 signaling [31, 32], and TLR signaling has several sex dimorphisms that might have contributed to the observed findings [2, 27, 33]. In young children, a mini-puberty – a temporary activation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis in the first months to years of life, coincides with the sexual dismorphisms of immune cell counts [34]. However, the sex differences observed in the present findings are less likely caused by inherent differences in the adaptive immune responses, as SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers induced by 3 µg of BNT162b2 were comparable between the sexes in this age group according to BNT162b2 manufacturer data [26]. The reason why no sex difference was found in that study may relate to the fact that the manufacturer study used a lower dose.

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of this study include the big sample size of the CoVacU5 dataset and the focus on a very young age group. Sex-stratified analyses in this group are often neglected despite the potential insight to differentiate hormone-dependent from actual sex-specific effects.

The present study also has limitations that need to be acknowledged. These include that no causal effects are investigated between vaccination and symptoms due to the observational design of the study, and that the symptom reports by legal guardians are of subjective nature and underlie both recall bias and potentially depend on the gender of the reporting person which was not reported. Finally, inflammatory post-vaccination symptoms including but not limited to myocarditis that are more frequent in male than female adolescents [35] were not assessed in this study due to the low number of events, and they are of importance and warrant additional investigation in young children.

Perspectives and significance

Increased odds of local and general symptoms in young girls compared to boys are apparent in young children after administration of COVID-19 vaccine. This observation has implications for present and future conceptions of approval studies as well as post-vaccination monitoring and the design of future mRNA applications. The choice of the pro-inflammatory mRNA vaccine delivery vehicle (i.e., types of lipids used for encapsulation) may thus be reevaluated in the future due to sex differences in post-vaccination symptoms affecting even very young children far before puberty. In addition, sex-specific vaccine dosing strategies may be evaluated to find the optimal potential trade-off between vaccine effectiveness and safety in each sex.

In conclusion, sex differences in post-vaccination symptoms after BNT162b2 administration are detectable even in young children. The mechanisms of increased local injection-site and general symptoms reported on the present dataset deserve further investigation in order to better guide future evaluation strategies of emerging vaccines.

Data availability

A restricted dataset is available from the corresponding author on request. Access to the full dataset can be requested upon approval by the Ethics Committee of University of Rostock, as it contains potentially identifying patient information.

References

  1. Fehervari Z. Vaccine sex differences. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(2):111–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klein SL, Jedlicka A, Pekosz A. The xs and Y of immune responses to viral vaccines. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(5):338–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fink AL, Engle K, Ursin RL, Tang WY, Klein SL. Biological sex affects vaccine efficacy and protection against influenza in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(49):12477–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Furman D, Hejblum BP, Simon N, Jojic V, Dekker CL, Thiébaut R, et al. Systems analysis of sex differences reveals an immunosuppressive role for testosterone in the response to influenza vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(2):869–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rettew JA, Huet-Hudson YM, Marriott I. Testosterone reduces macrophage expression in the mouse of toll-like receptor 4, a trigger for inflammation and innate immunity. Biol Reprod. 2008;78(3):432–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Agostino P, Milano S, Barbera C, Di Bella G, La Rosa M, Ferlazzo V, et al. Sex hormones modulate inflammatory mediators produced by macrophages. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;876:426–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bignucolo A, Scarabel L, Mezzalira S, Polesel J, Cecchin E, Toffoli G. Sex disparities in efficacy in COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Vaccines. 2021;9(8):825.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen A, Stromme M, Moyassari S, Chadha AS, Tartaglia MC, Szoeke C, et al. COVID-19 vaccines: considering sex differences in efficacy and safety. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022;115:106700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shapiro JR, Sitaras I, Park HS, Aytenfisu TY, Caputo C, Li M, et al. Association of Frailty, Age, and biological sex with severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Messenger RNA vaccine–Induced immunity in older adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(Supplement1):S61–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flanagan KL, Fink AL, Plebanski M, Klein SL. Sex and gender differences in the Outcomes of Vaccination over the Life Course. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2017;33(1):577–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Su JR, Moro PL, Ng CS, Lewis PW, Said MA, Cano MV. Anaphylaxis after vaccination reported to the vaccine adverse event reporting system, 1990–2016. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(4):1465–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Patone M, Mei XW, Handunnetthi L, Dixon S, Zaccardi F, Shankar-Hari M, et al. Risk of Myocarditis after sequential doses of COVID-19 vaccine and SARS-CoV-2 infection by Age and Sex. Circulation. 2022;146(10):743–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vassallo A, Shajahan S, Harris K, Hallam L, Hockham C, Womersley K, et al. Sex and gender in COVID-19 Vaccine Research: substantial evidence gaps remain. Front Glob Womens Health. 2021;2:761511.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Duijster JW, Lieber T, Pacelli S, Van Balveren L, Ruijs LS, Raethke M, et al. Sex-disaggregated outcomes of adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination: a Dutch cohort study and review of the literature. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1078736.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mori M, Yokoyama A, Shichida A, Sasuga K, Maekawa T, Moriyama T. Impact of sex and age on mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-related side effects in Japan. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(6):e0130922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Green MS, Peer V, Magid A, Hagani N, Anis E, Nitzan D. Gender differences in adverse events following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines. 2022;10(2):233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gee J, Marquez P, Su J, Calvert GM, Liu R, Myers T, et al. First Month of COVID-19 Vaccine Safety monitoring - United States, December 14, 2020-January 13, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(8):283–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Toepfner N, von Meißner WCG, Strumann C, Drinka D, Stuppe D, Jorczyk M, et al. Comparative safety of the BNT162b2 Messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine vs other approved vaccines in children younger than 5 years. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(10):e2237140–2237140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Strumann C, Ranzani O, Moor J, Berner R, Töpfner N, Chao CM, et al. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in children under 5 years. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(21):e173329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu W, Ren W, Wu T, Wang Q, Luo M, Yi Y, et al. Real-world safety of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Vaccines. 2023;11(6):1118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf. 2009;42(2):377–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cook IF. Sex differences in injection site reactions with human vaccines. Hum Vaccin. 2009;5(7):441–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kiely M, Tadount F, Lo E, Sadarangani M, Wei SQ, Rafferty E, et al. Sex differences in adverse events following seasonal influenza vaccines: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023;77(12):791–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hause AM, Marquez P, Zhang B, Moro PL, Myers TR, Bradley C, et al. Safety Monitoring of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine third doses among children aged 6 Months-5 years - United States, June 17, 2022-May 7, 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72(23):621–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Muñoz FM, Sher LD, Sabharwal C, Gurtman A, Xu X, Kitchin N, et al. Evaluation of BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine in children younger than 5 years of age. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(7):621–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee June 14–15. 2022 Meeting Briefing Document- FDA- Pfizer- COVID19 Vaccine for Pediatrics | FDA [Internet]. [cited 2023 Apr 17]. https://www.fda.gov/media/159195/download

  27. Aaby P, Benn CS, Flanagan KL, Klein SL, Kollmann TR, Lynn DJ, et al. The non-specific and sex-differential effects of vaccines. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(8):464–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Aaby P, Ravn H, Fisker AB, Rodrigues A, Benn CS. Is diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) associated with increased female mortality? A meta-analysis testing the hypotheses of sex-differential non-specific effects of DTP vaccine. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2016;110(10):570–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ciarambino T, Para O, Giordano M. Immune system and COVID-19 by sex differences and age. Womens Health Lond Engl. 2021;17:17455065211022262.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Li C, Lee A, Grigoryan L, Arunachalam PS, Scott MKD, Trisal M, et al. Mechanisms of innate and adaptive immunity to the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine. Nat Immunol. 2022;23(4):543–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao Y, Kuang M, Li J, Zhu L, Jia Z, Guo X, et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interacts with and activates TLR41. Cell Res. 2021;31(7):818–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zheng M, Karki R, Williams EP, Yang D, Fitzpatrick E, Vogel P, et al. TLR2 senses the SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein to produce inflammatory cytokines. Nat Immunol. 2021;22(7):829–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Roberts BJ, Moussawi M, Huber SA. Sex differences in TLR2 and TLR4 expression and their effect on coxsackievirus-induced autoimmune myocarditis. Exp Mol Pathol. 2013;94(1):58–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Karaoglan M, Nacarkahya G. Immunological interpretation of minipuberty: Minipuberty as the driving force of sexual dimorphism in the immune response. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2021;94(4):575–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee CW, Sa S, Hong M, Kim J, Shim SR, Han HW. Adverse events and Safety Profile of the COVID-19 vaccines in adolescents: Safety Monitoring for adverse events using real-World Data. Vaccines. 2022;10(5):744.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank all participating vaccination institutions, legal guardians, and children. We are thankful to the initiatives U12Schutz and Bildung Aber Sicher for help with recruitment of respondents.

Funding

JM was funded by the Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation. MBM was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 214187). Work of CMC was supported by University Medical Center Rostock and Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal. Work of NT was supported by University Medical Center Dresden. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CLINTEC Division of Renal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Jeanne Moor, Matthias B. Moor & Karolina Kublickiene

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

    Nicole Toepfner & Reinhard Berner

  3. Europäische Fachhochschule, Brühl, Germany

    Wolfgang C. G. von Meißner

  4. Institute of Family Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany

    Wolfgang C. G. von Meißner & Christoph Strumann

  5. LABMED Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Matthias B. Moor

  6. Department of Pediatrics, Helios University Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstraße 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany

    Cho-Ming Chao

  7. University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Rostock, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany

    Cho-Ming Chao

  8. Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany

    Cho-Ming Chao

Authors
  1. Jeanne Moor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicole Toepfner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wolfgang C. G. von Meißner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Reinhard Berner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matthias B. Moor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Karolina Kublickiene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christoph Strumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Cho-Ming Chao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CS had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. CS and CMC are co–senior authors. Concept and design: JM, CS, MBM, CMC Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: JM, NT, WCGvM, RB, MBM, KK, CS, CMC Drafting of the manuscript: JM, MBM, KK Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: JM, NT, WCGvM, RB, MBM, KK, CS, CMC Statistical analysis: CS Administrative, technical, or material support: NT, RB, CMC Supervision: KK, CS, CMC.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cho-Ming Chao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was assessed and approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Rostock, Germany (ID: A 2022-0065). All participants gave informed consent via their legal guardian.

Consent for publication

Not applicable (no individual data).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Christoph Strumann and Cho-Ming Chao co-senior authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moor, J., Toepfner, N., von Meißner, W.C.G. et al. Sex differences in symptoms following the administration of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in children below 5 years of age in Germany (CoVacU5): a retrospective cohort study. Biol Sex Differ 15, 74 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-024-00651-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-024-00651-x

Keywords

Biology of Sex Differences

ISSN: 2042-6410

Contact us