Skip to main content
Download PDF

Low testosterone levels relate to poorer cognitive function in women in an APOE-ε4-dependant manner

Biology of Sex Differences volume 15, Article number: 45 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Past research suggests that low testosterone levels relate to poorer cognitive function and higher Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk; however, these findings are inconsistent and are mostly derived from male samples, despite similar age-related testosterone decline in females. Both animal and human studies demonstrate that testosterone’s effects on brain health may be moderated by apolipoprotein E ε4 allele (APOE-ε4) carrier status, which may explain some previous inconsistencies. We examined how testosterone relates to cognitive function in older women versus men across healthy aging and the AD continuum and the moderating role of APOE-ε4 genotype.

Methods

Five hundred and sixty one participants aged 55–90 (155 cognitively normal (CN), 294 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 112 AD dementia) from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), who had baseline cognitive and plasma testosterone data, as measured by the Rules Based Medicine Human DiscoveryMAP Panel were included. There were 213 females and 348 males (self-reported sex assigned at birth), and 52% of the overall sample were APOE-ε4 carriers. We tested the relationship of plasma testosterone levels and its interaction with APOE-ε4 status on clinical diagnostic group (CN vs. MCI vs. AD), global, and domain-specific cognitive performance using ANOVAs and linear regression models in sex-stratified samples. Cognitive domains included verbal memory, executive function, processing speed, and language.

Results

We did not observe a significant difference in testosterone levels between clinical diagnostic groups in either sex, regrardless of APOE-ε4 status. Across clinical diagnostic group, we found a significant testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction in females, such that lower testosterone levels related to worse global cognition, processing speed, and verbal memory in APOE-ε4 carriers only. We did not find that testosterone, nor its interaction with APOE-ε4, related to cognitive outcomes in males.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that low testosterone levels in older female APOE-ε4 carriers across the aging-MCI-AD continuum may have deleterious, domain-specific effects on cognitive performance. Although future studies including additional sex hormones and longitudinal cognitive trajectories are needed, our results highlight the importance of including both sexes and considering APOE-ε4 carrier status when examining testosterone’s role in cognitive health.

Highlights

  • We investigated the relationship between testosterone levels and cognitive function in women and men across the Alzheimer’s dementia continuum and the modifying role of the APOE-ε4 allele.

  • A significant testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction indicated that lower plasma testosterone levels related to worse global and domain-specific cognition, for verbal memory and processing speed, in female APOE-ε4 carriers only.

  • Plasma testosterone levels did not relate to global or domain-specific cognition in males, regardless of APOE-ε4 status.

  • While most studies examine the testosterone and brain health connection in men, our findings suggest that it is equally important, if not more, to examine this connection in women and to account for APOE-ε4 status.

  • Upon replication, our findings suggest the potential for low testosterone levels as a modifiable risk factor in which intervention approaches can be optimized for each sex.

Plain English summary

Sex differences often suggest a role of sex hormones, and in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) research, women show higher disease prevalence, accelerated cognitive decline, and an enhanced effect of the strongest genetic risk factor for AD, the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele (APOE-ε4). Testosterone, largely regarded as a “male” sex hormone, has demonstrated protective effects against AD in rodent studies including both sexes. However, human research often only includes males, limiting our understanding of testosterone's effect on AD risk and cognitive function. In this study, we investigated whether testosterone levels in the blood relate to cognitive performance measuring overall (global) cognition, verbal memory (remembering word lists or stories), executive function (complex thinking/multitasking), processing speed (how quickly one completes thinking tasks), and language (naming objects) in both sexes. We also tested whether this relationship is influenced by the APOE-ε4 genetic risk factor. We found that in females carrying APOE-ε4, lower testosterone levels related to worse performance on global cognition, processing speed, and verbal memory tests; however, testosterone levels did not relate to cognitive performance on any test in males nor in females without the APOE-ε4 genetic risk factor. Our findings suggest that the lower testosterone levels may be a contributing factor to worse AD outcomes in women, particularly for those at higher genetic risk for AD. Our results also demonstrate the importance of including female participants and considering the APOE-ε4 genetic risk factor when studying testosterone and brain health.

Background

There are important sex differences in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), the predominant form of dementia. Compared to men, women have a higher prevalence of AD diagnoses [1], show greater pathological burden in the early disease stages [2,3,4,5,6], and a different cognitive trajectory as the disease progresses [7, 8]. Women also demonstrate a more adverse effect of the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele (APOE-ε4), the most dominant genetic AD risk factor, on AD risk [9,10,11] and other AD-related outcomes [12, 13].

The mechanisms underlying these sex differences in AD are unknown, reflecting a knowledge gap that impedes optimizing treatments. However, sex differences often suggest a role of sex hormones. While many studies have examined how endogenous and exogenous levels of estrogen relate to brain health outcomes in women [14, 15], testosterone has been historically regarded as a male hormone and is often overlooked in women’s brain health research. Although circulating levels of testosterone in women are on average one tenth of that in men [16], women demonstrate a range of peripheral testosterone levels, and testosterone levels in the brain are similar between the two sexes [17, 18]. Furthermore, endogenous testosterone levels are close to, or even higher than, circulating estrogen levels in postmenopausal women [19]. Preclinical studies have demonstrated testosterone’s neuroprotective effects [20, 21], such as supplemental testosterone increasing spine synapses in the rat hippocampus [22], promoting neuronal plasticity via stimulating cellular differentiation [23], and reducing the reactivity of astrocytes from brain insults [24].

Low testosterone has been extensively studied as a risk factor for AD and cognitive deficits in older men [25,26,27]. Many studies have linked lower testosterone levels to higher AD risk [28, 29] and poorer cognitive function [30,31,32] in healthy aging men; however, results have not always been consistent [32,33,34]. Furthermore, the relationship of testosterone to the AD-specific pathologies of amyloid-beta and phospohorylated tau (p-Tau) has been studied in cellular and animal models. Testosterone treatment of cultured rat neurons reduced amyloid-beta precursor protein and soluble amyloid-beta secretion over time [35] and protected hippocampal neurons from amyloid-beta induced cell death [36]. In male rats with gonadectomies, testosterone treatment reversed amyloid-beta accumulation in the brain [37]. In regards to p-Tau, studies including male and female gonadectomized rats demonstrated that the removal of endogenous hormones causes tau hyperphosphorylation, but found a reversal of this effect following testosterone treatment [38, 39].

Both animal and human studies demonstrate that the effects of testosterone on the brain may be moderated by APOE genotype, likely because of a shared role of APOE and testosterone in the lipoprotein pathway and in inflammatory mechanisms [40], which in turn modulate androgen receptor sensitivity [41]. Pfankuch et al. [42] found that castration impaired novel location recognition in male APOE-ε4 mice, but not APOE-ε3 or APOE knockout mice. Raber et al. [43] found that blockade of androgen receptors in male mice led to memory deficits in APOE-ε4 mice only. Notably, the same study found that in female mice, androgen treatment improved cognitive outcomes in APOE-ε4 mice, but not in APOE-ε3 or APOE knockout mice. Therefore, animal models have highlighted the importance of examining the APOE-ε4 by testosterone interaction in both sexes. Human studies have also demonstrated an APOE-ε4 and testosterone interaction; however, the direction of this interaction in has been less consistent and women are typically not included in these studies. Specifically, some studies demonstrate that certain associations are stronger in APOE-ε4 male carriers, such as lower testosterone relating to smaller hippocampi [44] and poorer episodic memory [45], whereas another study reported that lower testosterone relates to higher likelihood of AD diagnosis in older male APOE-ε4 non-carriers only [46].

We previously analyzed participants of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and found that low plasma levels of total and free testosterone related to higher cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-Tau levels. When stratifying by sex assigned at birth, we found significantly higher levels of CSF p-Tau in APOE-ε4 carrier females versus males; however, this difference was eliminated after adjusting for testosterone levels [47]. These findings suggest that the lower testosterone levels in females compared to males may contribute to higher p-Tau biomarker levels and highlight the importance of including women in studies of testosterone. In the present study, we extended these findings and examine the interaction between testosterone and APOE-ε4 on clinical diagnostic group (cognitively normal (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD dementia (AD)) and global and domain-specific cognitive function in females versus males (sex assigned at birth) across the AD continuum. Based on our previous findings [47], we hypothesized that lower testosterone levels would relate to a clinical diagnosis of cognitive impairment (MCI or AD versus CNs) and poorer cognitive function across clinical diagnostic groups in both females and males. We also hypothesized that APOE-ε4 genotype would show a moderating effect in females only, with female APOE-ε4 carriers showing stronger relationships between testosterone and cognitive outcomes than non-carriers.

Methods

Participants

Data was downloaded from ADNI, which is publicly accessible at http://adni.loni.usc.edu. ADNI is a longitudinal, multi-site, cohort study that aims to combine neuroimaging, neuropsychological, clinical, and biomarker assessments to measure prognosis and pathogenesis of AD. The enrollment, clinical characterization, and inclusion/exclusion criteria for ADNI have been previously described [48]. This study included baseline data from participants in ADNI who had cognitive test data, plasma-based free testosterone levels, as measured by the Rules Based Medicine (RBM) Human Discovery Map panel, and APOE genotype data. The sample included 561 older adults aged 55–90 (213 females, 348 males based on self-reported sex assigned at birth), where 290 (52%) were APOE-ε4 carriers. The sample included 155 (28%) cognitively normal, 294 (52%) early and late mild cognitive impairment, and 112 (20%) AD dementia individuals.

Testosterone

Total testosterone levels (ng/mL) in plasma were measured on the Luminex xMAP platform by Biomarkers Consortium Plasma Proteomics Project Rules-Based Medicine multiplex (http://www.rulesbasedmedicine.com) as part of a panel of 190 analytes related to a diverse array of human disease. A Box-Cox transformation was applied to raw assay values to normalize the distribution. Since sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) is a protein that binds testosterone, SHBG (nmol/L) values from the same panel were used to calculate free, or bioavailable testosterone level, using total testosterone/SHBG × 100. A Pearson’s correlation demonstrated that free and total testosterone were significantly correlated (r = 0.99, p < 0.001). Descriptions of assay and normalization methods for this panel, developed on the Luminex xMAP platform by Rules-Based Medicine (RBM), can be found in “Biomarkers Consortium Plasma Proteomics Data Primer 02Aug2013 Final.pdf”, available for download at http://adni.loni.usc.edu/data-samples/access-data/. In young healthy volunteers, the lowest detectable dose for total testosterone was 0.17 ng/mL, the lower assay limit was 0.029 ng/mL, and the plasma range was 0.11–6.5 ng/mL. In our sample, 26 female participants (< 5% of the total sample) had readings below the least detectable dose; these values were imputed for the normalized testosterone levels using a value of half of the lowest detectable dose (0.085 ng/mL).

Cognitive measures

The cognitive outcomes included tests to assess global cognition (Mini Mental Status Exam [MMSE]), verbal memory (Logical Memory-Delayed Recall [LM-DR]), executive function (Trail Making Test, Part B [TMTB]), processing speed (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST]) and language (Boston Naming Test [BNT]). Higher scores on the MMSE, LM-DR, DSST and BNT reflect better performance while lower scores on the TMTB (second to complete task) reflect better performance. Due to a skewed distribution, the LM-DR and TMTB scores were log-transformed.

Clinical diagnosis

Diagnosis of CN versus MCI was based on the Jak/Bondi actuarial diagnostic methods. Application of the Jak/Bondi diagnosis to ADNI produced more discernible cognitive phenotypes, more stable diagnoses, stronger associations with AD biomarkers, and better predication of progression to dementia compared to conventional diagnostic criteria [49]. Jak/Bondi diagnostic methods include six neuropsychological tests representing three cognitive domains: Trail-Making Tests A and B (psychomotor speed and executive function domain), Category Fluency and Boston Naming Test (language domain) and the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) Delayed Recall and Recognition tests (episodic memory domain). An impaired score was defined as more than one standard deviation below the age-, education-, and sex-corrected normative mean. MCI diagnosis required impairment on two tests within a cognitive domain or one impaired score in each of the three cognitive domains. Diagnostic criteria for AD was based on the conventional criteria used in ADNI including: Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 20–26, Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0.5–1, and a diagnosis of probable AD dementia based on the NINCDS/ADRDA criteria [50].

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were run using free testosterone levels, as free testosterone is more biologically relevant; however, analyses were repeated with total testosterone levels to examine how results changed. Participant characteristics, testosterone levels, and cognitive outcomes were compared by sex and APOE-ε4 status using independent-samples t-tests for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-squared tests for categorical variables. We conducted analysis of covariance tests (ANCOVAs) to test for an interaction between clinical diagnostic group (CN, MCI, AD) and APOE-ε4 allele status (carrier versus non-carrier) on the dependent variable, testosterone, in sex-stratified samples. For our analyses with cognitive outcomes, we then conducted a series of linear regression models in sex-stratified samples with the independent variables of testosterone, APOE-ε4 status, and their interaction, and the dependent variable of cognitive test score. For all statistical models, considered covariates included age, education, body mass index (BMI), and self-reported history of cardiovascular disease, such as hypertension or high cholestserol. Any covariate that was not significant in the multivariable regression model at a p ≤ 0.10 threshold level was removed from the final model. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS Version 28 and R Version 2023.06.1 + 524.

Results

Sample characteristics

See Table 1 for sample characteristics and variables of interest by sex and APOE-ε4 carrier status. There was no significant difference in the percentage of APOE-ε4 carriers between sex (p = 0.92). On average, the female participants were significantly younger (p = 0.03) and less educated than males (p < 0.001). Additionally, females had a lower prevalence of cardiovascular disease (p = 0.06) and significantly lower BMI (p < 0.001). As expected, total and free testosterone levels were significantly lower in females (ps < 0.001), but there were no significant sex differences in cognitive test performance except for in the language domain, with males scoring significantly higher on the BNT (p < 0.001).

Table 1 Sample characteristics by sex and APOE-ε4 carrier status
Full size table

Across both sexes, APOE-ε4 carriers had a significantly higher prevalence of MCI and AD dementia diagnoses and lower mean scores on the MMSE and LM-DR than non-carriers (ps < 0.005). Female APOE-ε4 carriers were significantly younger (p = 0.002), less educated (p = 0.02) and had a lower mean score on the TMTB (p = 0.03) than female non-carriers. Male APOE-ε4 carriers had significantly lower plasma total testosterone (p = 0.03) and free testosterone (p = 0.01) compared to male non-carriers.

Clinical diagnosis

The relationship of the clinical diagnostic group, and its interaction with APOE-ε4, to free testosterone levels in each sex was assessed. Among females, the main effects of clinical diagnostic group (F(2,209) = 0.46, p = 0.63), APOE-ε4 (F(1,209) = 1.21, p = 0.27), or their interaction (F(2,207) = 1.44, p = 0.24) on free testosterone levels were not significant. However, visual inspection of the data showed that, among female APOE-ε4 carriers only, free testosterone levels decreased as clinical diagnosis severity increased (Fig. 1). Female APOE-ε4 carriers showed higher free testosterone levels than female APOE-ε4 non-carriers in the CN and MCI groups, with this difference being significant and of moderate effect size within the CN group (t(13.4) = − 2.38, p = 0.03; Cohen’s d = − 0.80).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mean free testosterone levels by clinical diagnostic group and APOE-ε4 status in both sexes. Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), we found no significant interactive effects of free testosterone by APOE-ε4, nor main effects of testosterone, in either sex, on clinical diagnostic group. Relevant covariates were age, education, BMI, and self-reported history of cardiovascular events. CN cognitively normal, MCI mild cognitive impairment, AD Alzheimer’s Dementia. Error bars represent standard error

Full size image

In males, the clinical diagnostic group by APOE-ε4 interaction was not significant (F(2,341) = 0.86, p = 0.43). After removing the interaction from the model, there was no main effect of clinical diagnostic group (F(2,343) = 0.26, p = 0.77), but, as expected based on sample descriptives, there was a main effect of APOE-ε4 (F(1,343) = 6.63, p = 0.01) on testosterone levels in males such that male APOE-ε4 carriers had significantly lower free testosterone levels than non-carriers, in contrast to the female CN group. Results did not substantively change when examining total testosterone levels.

Global cognition

The relationship between free testosterone and global cognition (MMSE) in each sex was assessed (Fig. 2). In females, the linear model revealed a significant testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction (β = 0.23, SE = 0.001, p = 0.02). In female APOE-ε4 carriers, there was a trending relationship between higher testosterone levels and better MMSE performance (β = 0.14, SE = 0.001, p = 0.10), whereas this trend was reversed in female APOE-ε4 non-carriers, (β = − 0.17, SE = 0.001, p = 0.09). In males, there was no significant or trending testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction (β = − 0.02, SE = 0.002, p = 0.89) or main effect of testosterone (β = 0.08, SE = 0.001, p = 0.29) on MMSE performance. Results did not substantively change when examining total testosterone levels.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The relationship between freetestosterone levels and global cognition by APOE-ε4 carrier status in both sexes. Using multivariable linear regression, we revealed a significant freetestosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction and global cognition in female APOE-ε4 carriers only. In males, there were no significant effects of free testosterone levels nor its interaction with APOE-ε4 on global cognition. Relevant covariates were age, education, BMI, and self-reported history of cardiovascular events. The p-value and beta coefficient for each test are included

Full size image

Due to the unexpected lack of a relationship between testosterone levels and global cognition in men, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to examine whether this relationship would manifest among a subset of men in the lowest tertile of normalized free testosterone levels (≤ 20.18 ng/mL). Eighty-seven (25%) of men were in this low testosterone group (see Supplemental Table 1 for sample characteristics by APOE-ε4 status in this male subset). In males with low testosterone levels, there was no significant or trending testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction (β = 0.17, SE = 0.04, p = 0.38), nor main effect of testosterone (β = 0.20, SE = 0.03, p = 0.25). Results did not substantively change when examining total testosterone levels.

Verbal memory

The relationship between free testosterone and verbal memory (LM-DR) in each sex was assessed (Fig. 3A). The linear model revealed a significant testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction in females (β = 0.27, SE = 0.003, p = 0.02). In female APOE-ε4 carriers, higher testosterone levels significantly related to better LM-DR performance (β = 0.26, SE = 0.002, p = 0.03). This relationship was reversed in female APOE-ε4 non-carriers, although it was not significant nor trending (β = − 0.14, SE = 0.002, p = 0.19). In males, there was no significant or trending testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction (all: β = − 0.05, SE = 0.003, p = 0.69) nor main effect of testosterone (β = 0.00929, SE = 0.002, p = 0.90) on LM-DR performance. Results did not substantively change when examining total testosterone levels.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The relationship between freetestosterone levels and domain-specific cognitive function by APOE-ε4 carrier status in both sexes. Multivariable linear regressions were performed to test for a free testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction on domain-specific cognitive outcome in each sex. A, C Show a significant testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction on verbal memory (A) and processing speed (C) in female APOE-ε4 carriers only. In males, there were no significant effects of free testosterone, nor its interaction with APOE-ε4 on the domain-specific cognitive outcomes in A or C. B, D Show no significant testosterone by APOE-ε4 interactions on executive function (B) and language (D) in either sex. Relevant covariates were age, education, BMI, and self-reported history of cardiovascular events. The p-value and beta coefficient for each test are included

Full size image

In a sensitivity analysis limited to men in the lowest tertile of free testsosterone values, there was no significant or trending testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction (β = − 0.08, SE = 0.006, p = 0.71), nor main effect of testosterone (β = 0.02, SE = 0.004, p = 0.92) on LM-DR performance. Results did not substantively change when examining total testosterone levels.

Executive function

The relationship between free testosterone and executive function (TMTB) in each sex was assessed (Fig. 3B). The linear model revealed no significant or trending testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction in females (β = − 0.15, SE = 0.002, p = 0.15) or males (β = − 0.03, SE = 0.002, p = 0.79), nor any significant or trending main effect of testosterone in females (β = 0.07, SE = 0.001, p = 0.45) or males (β = 0.01, SE = 0.001, p = 0.86). Results did not substantively change when examining total testosterone levels.

In a sensitivity analysis limited to men in the lowest tertile of free testsosterone values, there was no significant or trending testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction (β = − 0.22, SE = 0.004, p = 0.29), nor main effect of testosterone (β = 0.11, SE = 0.003, p = 0.54) on TMTB performance. Results did not substantively change when examining total testosterone levels.

Processing speed

The relationship between free testosterone and processing speed (DSST) in each sex was assessed (Fig. 3C). The linear model revealed a significant testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction in females (β = 0.23, SE = 0.09, p = 0.03). In female APOE-ε4 carriers, higher free testosterone levels was trending in relation to better DSST performance (β = 0.17, SE = 0.06, p = 0.08), whereas this relationship reached significance when examining total testosterone (β = 0.19, SE = 0.42, p = 0.05). This association was reversed in female ε4 non-carriers, although it was not significant nor trending (β = − 0.13, SE = 0.06, p = 0.20). In males, there were no significant or trending testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction (β = − 0.02, SE = 0.10, p = 0.89) or main effect of testosterone (β = 0.06, SE = 0.07, p = 0.42) on DSST performance. Aside from the result in female APOE-ε4 carriers, results did not substantively change when examining total testosterone levels.

In a sensitivity analysis limited to men in the lowest tertile of free testsosterone values, there was no significant or trending testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction (β = 0.16, SE = 0.20, p = 0.42), nor main effect of testosterone (β = 0.07, SE = 0.16, p = 0.68) on DSST performance. Results did not substantively change when examining total testosterone levels.

Language

The relationship between free testosterone and language (BNT) in each sex was assessed (Fig. 3D). The linear model revealed no significant or trending testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction in females (β = 0.11, SE = 0.03, p = 0.26) or men (β = 0.03, SE = 0.04, p = 0.78), nor any significant or trending main effect of testosterone in females (β = − 0.06, SE = 0.02, p = 0.46) or in males (β = − 0.02, SE = 0.03, p = 0.83). Results did not substantively change when examining total testosterone levels.

In a sensitivity analysis limited to men in the lowest tertile of free testsosterone values, there was no significant or trending testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction (β = 0.16, SE = 0.09, p = 0.44), nor main effect of testosterone (β = − 0.17, SE = 0.07, p = 0.35) on BNT performance. Results did not substantively change when examining total testosterone levels.

Discussion

Our findings demonstrate that, among older female APOE-ε4 carriers, higher circulating free testosterone levels related to better global cognition, verbal memory, and processing speed scores. In contrast, these relationships were not observed among female non-carriers, nor in males, even when limiting to a low testosterone male sample. These relationships in females were domain-specific, as they were not observed with executive function or language performance. The specificity of the testosterone and cognition relationship to female APOE-ε4 carriers is consistent with our hypotheses and with our prior findings of lower testosterone levels relating to higher CSF p-Tau levels, particularly among female APOE-ε4 carriers [47]. However, inconsistent with our hypotheses, testosterone did not relate to cognitive outcomes in males, regardless of APOE-ε4 genotype.

Also contrary to hypotheses, testosterone levels did not differ by clinical diagnostic group, regardless of sex or APOE-ε4 genotype. These inconsistencies are likely due to the domain-specificity of the testosterone and cognition relationships in females, as multiple domains factored into the clinical diagnosis, and may be a consequence of the lower statistical power when analyzing relationships with categorical variables, such as diagnostic group, versus continuous data, such as testosterone levels. Studies with larger samples across the healthy aging, MCI, and AD trajectory are needed to more definitively test testosterone by APOE-ε4 interactions on clinical diagnostic group. Overall, these results add to our prior findings in support of a role of testosterone in postmenopausal women’s brain health and further underscore the importance of examining testosterone in women as opposed to limiting testosterone studies to men.

As mentioned in the introduction, testosterone has neuroprotective effects [20, 22,23,24] including those specifically against AD pathology [35,36,37,38,39], lending biological plausibility to our findings of higher testosterone relating to better cognition across the AD continuum. Another possibility is that the observed testosterone and cognition links in females may be driven by estrogen related mechanisms. Whereas ovarian production of estradiol decreases substantially during menopause, testosterone levels decline gradually throughout adulthood in females, similar to males [17, 51]. Circulating estrogens are also synthesized by the aromatization of testosterone via the enzyme aromatase [52, 53]. Previous studies in postmenopausal women have demonstrated that aromatase mRNA levels in adipose tissue increase as a function of age [54], reflecting an increase in the conversion of testosterone to estrogen. In fact, after the menopause transition, the aromatization of androgens in peripheral tissues becomes the primary source of estrogen production in postmenopausal females [55,56,57]. Like testosterone, estrogen has neuroprotective effects [58], including stimulating neurogenesis and synaptogenesis [59,60,61] and protecting against amyloid-beta plaque deposition [62]. Another similarity to testosterone is evidence of an estrogen and APOE-ε4 interaction, where the deleterious effects of postmenopausal estrogen deficiency on the brain appear more robust in APOE-ε4 carriers compared to non-carriers [63,64,65]. Levels of circulating estradiol were not available ADNI, which precluded our ability to consider the role of estrogen in the present study, but examining both sex hormones and their relationship with APOE-ε4 may provide a clearer picture for our sex-specific results.

The relationships between testosterone and cognition in females were limited to the cognitive outcomes of global cognition, verbal memory and processing speed. On average, women tend to show better performance on these cognitive domains over men [66,67,68,69]. The female advantage in verbal memory has been studied in the context of the AD continuum and is found to persist in the early AD stages [70,71,72]. Cognitive sex biases suggest that sex hormones may play a role in brain development and functioning related to these cognitive domains. Accordantly, studies have shown that performance on verbal memory and processing speed tests worsen during the menopausal transition [73, 74], depend on estrogen receptor genotype [75], and decline with increasing years since menopause [76]. In conjuction with these past findings, the specificity of our findings to cognitive domains with a female bias may further support a mechanistic role of the aromatization of androgens to estrogen in explaining our results. Although few studies have examined testosterone and cognitive links in women, our findings differ from some previous results. Hogervorst et al. [46] found a negative relationship between testosterone levels and processing speed performance and Yaffe et al. [77] found that testosterone levels did not relate to MMSE performance in older women. Our findings suggest that these inconsistencies may be due to a lack of accounting for the moderating role of APOE-ε4 status in these prior studies.

The lack of a relationship between testosterone levels and cognition in males was inconsistent with our hypotheses, and we can only speculate as to why we obtained this null result. One possibility is that there was a greater variance of testosterone levels in females compared to males, with the standard deviation of free and total testosterone in females double the male standard deviations. The larger spectrum of female testosterone values allows more opportunity to observe how differing testosterone levels relate to cognition. Another possibility may relate to our cognitive outcomes, as previous work has demonstrated that testosterone selectively relates to visuospatial performance in older men [78,79,80,81], and our present analysis did not include a visuospatial task. In addition, other studies have found a null association between testosterone treatment and cognitive outcomes when studying men who are within the low-to-normal range of testosterone, rather than hypogonadal or severely androgen-deficient [82, 83]. Studies aiming to characterize hypogonadism in the aging male population have found that symptoms often do not map onto plasma testosterone levels, due to normal age-related testosterone decline [84, 85]. Thus, the field has moved towards diagnosing hypogonadism in older men only if clinical symptoms are present in conjunction with low testosterone values [86, 87]. Due to the lack of clinical symptom data available in ADNI, we elected to use a tertile split to conduct sensitivity analysis specifically among male participants in the lowest normalized free testosterone values. We continued to not detect significant associations between cognitive outcomes and testosterone levels, nor the testosterone by APOE-ε4 interaction, in this subset; however, it remains unknown whether results would vary if we were able to clinically characterize hypogonadal males.

Our results suggest a contributing role of low testosterone levels in cognitive decline in female APOE-ε4 carriers and, thus, stress the importance of considering APOE-ε4 status when examining the role of testosterone in brain health, particularly in women. Additionally, our results suggest a potential mechanism underlying the stronger effect of APOE-ε4 in females on AD risk and AD-related outcomes. Testosterone levels are commonly lower in females compared to males, and if the APOE-ε4 allele has a more adverse effect on cognition in the context of lower testosterone levels, then more females may be susceptible to this genetic effect. Another explanation could be that testosterone may have a threshold amount needed to support the brain’s cognitive functioning during aging, especially in those with APOE-ε4 alleles, and males may not fall below this threshold even as their testosterone levels decline with age. Even among men in the lowest quartile of free testosterone levels, the average testosterone level was still higher than in our female sample, suggesting that even the lower range of testosterone values in men may not be deficient enough to exacerbate the negative effects of APOE-ε4 on cognition. However, it is again unknown how results might differ among a clinically characterized hypogonadal male sample.

Multiple biological pathways have linked testosterone levels to APOE genotype. First, circulating testosterone is highly implicated in high density lipoprotein cholesterol metabolism [88, 89], and APOE is a major transporter of lipoproteins in the brain [90], suggesting interactions between testosterone and APOE genotypes in metabolic brain pathways. Secondly, APOE-ε4 and testosterone both have links to inflammation. In addition to neuroprotective effects, testosterone has been shown to have antinflammatory effects [91,92,93] in both sexes. Conversely, experimental animal models suggest that the APOE-ε4 genotype is associated with a proinflammatory response [94, 95]. Thus, APOE-ε4 carriers may benefit more strongly from testosterone’s anti-inflammatory effects or the combination of low testosterone levels and the APOE-ε4 genotype may increase neuroinflammation. Lastly, the APOE-ε4 allele is associated with reduced amounts of androgen receptors in the neocortex [43], suggesting that APOE-ε4 carriers may have amplified effects from low testosterone due to weaker androgen signaling.

There are several study limitations that warrant consideration. First, the largely white and well-educated sample available through the ADNI database is not reflective of the overall United States population. Studies are needed in more diverse, community-based cohorts to examine the generalizability of our results. Secondly, a lack of available plasma estradiol data in the ADNI database precluded us from examining whether these effects were estrogen-independent or mediated by the aromatization of testosterone to estrogen. Also, there were no available CSF measures of testosterone, which would have better measured brain levels of the sex hormone and likely been more relevant for examining the effect of testosterone on cognitive functioning. While we conducted a sensitivity analyses among men in the lowest tertile of testosterone levels, we were unable to test prior findings of a testosterone and cognition relationship among hypogonadal men, due to the unavailability of hypogonadal clinical symptom data in ADNI. Additionally, this study was cross-sectional so we were not able to determine the temporal relationships between changes in testosterone and changes in cognition. Although evidence from prior studies suggests that testosterone’s effects precede AD outcomes, there is potential for bidirectional relationships where AD pathology may negatively feedback testosterone levels by inhibiting steroid hormone production [96, 97]. Lastly, we are unable to account for all potential confounding variables, such as medications taken that may influence both sex hormone production and cognitive performance. Despite these limitations, our findings contribute to the understanding of sex differences in cognitive performance across the healthy aging and AD continuum and underscore potential for missed scientific discoveries when analyses involving testosterone are limited to men.

Perspectives and significance

Our findings hold clinical significance in that low testosterone levels are potentially modifiable. Although numerous studies have investigated whether testosterone supplementation has an effect on cognition [98] and AD pathology [99] in men, the benefits of testosterone supplementation in relation to older women’s cognitive health remain largely uninvestigated, although testosterone therapy has recently been studied in women’s sexual health [100]. However, testosterone modulation may be achieved without supplementation, as testosterone is one of the primary molecules secreted during resistance exercise [101] in men and women [102, 103]. Our results may suggest that either pharmaceutical or lifestyle approaches to increasing low testosterone levels may be particularly beneficial for cognitive health in female APOE-ε4 carriers. Furthermore, our results may enlighten mechanisms underlying cognitive sex difference and the more adverse effect of the APOE-ε4 allele in female carriers and therefore emphasize the importance of including women and accounting for APOE-ε4 status when examining testosterone and brain health. While our findings require replication in more generalizable cohorts and with longitudinal data, our findings underscore the potential for missed scientific discoveries when analyses involving testosterone are limited to men.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our results suggest that female APOE-ε4 carriers are most sensitive to testosterone’s effects on cognitive performance. We demonstrated that in female APOE-ε4 carriers, lower plasma testosterone was associated with worse global cognition, processing speed, and verbal memory, but found no associations between testosterone and cognition in female APOE-ε4 non-carriers, nor in men, regardless of APOE-ε4 status or whether testosterone levels were in the low range for males. These analyses underscore the importance of considering sex and APOE-ε4 status in testosterone and brain health studies, and posits potential for modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline, particularly among women at higher genetic risk for AD.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting this article is available in the ADNI repository [adni.loni.usc.edu].

References

  1. 2019 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:321–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.01.010.

  2. Oveisgharan S, Arvanitakis Z, Yu L, Farfel J, Schneider JA, Bennett DA. Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease and common neuropathologies of aging. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136:887–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1920-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Buckley RF, Mormino EC, Rabin JS, Hohman TJ, Landau S, Hanseeuw BJ, et al. Sex differences in the association of global amyloid and regional tau deposition measured by positron emission tomography in clinically normal older adults. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(5):542–51. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4693.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsiknia AA, Edland SD, Sundermann EE, Reas ET, Brewer JB, Galasko D, et al. Sex differences in plasma p-tau181 associations with Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers, cognitive decline, and clinical progression. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27(10):4314–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01675-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mofrad RB, Tijms BM, Scheltens P, Barkhof F, van der Flier WM, Sikkes SA, Teunissen CE. Sex differences in CSF biomarkers vary by Alzheimer disease stage and APOE ε4 genotype. Neurology. 2020;95(17):e2378–88. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010629.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shokouhi S, Taylor WD, Albert K, Kang H, Newhouse PA, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. In vivo network models identify sex differences in the spread of tau pathology across the brain. Alzheimers Dement (Diagn Assess Dis Monit). 2020;12(1): e12016. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Caldwell JZ, Berg JL, Cummings JL, Banks SJ, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Moderating effects of sex on the impact of diagnosis and amyloid positivity on verbal memory and hippocampal volume. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017;9:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0300-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin KA, Choudhury KR, Rathakrishnan BG, Marks DM, Petrella JR, Doraiswamy PM, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Marked gender differences in progression of mild cognitive impairment over 8 years. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2015;1(2):103–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2015.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Altmann A, Tian L, Henderson VW, Greicius MD, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Investigators. Sex modifies the APOE-related risk of developing Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2014;75(4):563–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Farrer LA, Cupples LA, Haines JL, Hyman B, Kukull WA, Mayeux R, et al. Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1997;278(16):1349–56. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550160069041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Payami H, Zareparsi S, Montee KR, Sexton GJ, Kaye JA, Bird TD, et al. Gender difference in apolipoprotein E-associated risk for familial Alzheimer disease: a possible clue to the higher incidence of Alzheimer disease in women. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;58(4):803.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Holland D, Desikan RS, Dale AM, McEvoy LK. Higher rates of decline for women and apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(12):2287–93. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang X, Zhou W, Ye T, Lin X, Zhang J, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Sex difference in the association of APOE-E4 with memory decline in mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;69(4):1161–9. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-181234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hogervorst E, Williams J, Budge M, Riedel W, Jolles J. The nature of the effect of female gonadal hormone replacement therapy on cognitive function in post-menopausal women: a meta-analysis. Neuroscience. 2000;101(3):485–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00410-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Russell JK, Jones CK, Newhouse PA. The role of estrogen in brain and cognitive aging. Neurotherapeutics. 2019;16:649–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-019-00766-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Judd HL, Judd GE, Lucas WE, Yen SS. Endocrine function of the postmenopausal ovary: concentration of androgens and estrogens in ovarian and peripheral vein blood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974;39(6):1020–4. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-39-6-1020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosario ER, Chang L, Head EH, Stanczyk FZ, Pike CJ. Brain levels of sex steroid hormones in men and women during normal aging and in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(4):604–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.04.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hammond GL, Hirvonen J, Vihko R. Progesterone, androstenedione, testosterone, 5α-dihydrotestosterone and androsterone concentrations in specific regions of the human brain. J Steroid Biochem. 1983;18(2):185–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4731(83)90086-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Davison SL, Davis SR. Androgens in women. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;85(2–5):363–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0760(03)00204-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Siddiqui AN, Siddiqui N, Khan RA, Kalam A, Jabir NR, Kamal MA, et al. Neuroprotective role of steroidal sex hormones: an overview. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2016;22(5):342–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.12538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. McEwen BS, Milner TA. Understanding the broad influence of sex hormones and sex differences in the brain. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95(1–2):24–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Leranth C, Petnehazy O, MacLusky NJ. Gonadal hormones affect spine synaptic density in the CA1 hippocampal subfield of male rats. J Neurosci. 2003;23(5):1588–92. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-05-01588.2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsumoto A. Hormonally induced neuronal plasticity in the adult motoneurons. Brain Res Bull. 1997;44(4):539–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-9230(97)00240-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barreto G, Veiga S, Azcoitia I, Garcia-Segura LM, Garcia-Ovejero D. Testosterone decreases reactive astroglia and reactive microglia after brain injury in male rats: role of its metabolites, oestradiol and dihydrotestosterone. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25(10):3039–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05563.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lv W, Du N, Liu Y, Fan X, Wang Y, Jia X, et al. Low testosterone level and risk of Alzheimer’s disease in the elderly men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53:2679–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-015-9315-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Verdile G, Laws SM, Henley D, Ames D, Bush AI, Ellis KA, et al. Associations between gonadotropins, testosterone and β amyloid in men at risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19(1):69–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2012.147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dusi CRA, Morillo LS, Magaldi RM, Machado AN, Liberman S, Jacob FW. Testosterone profile in older men with Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Neuropsychol. 2008;2:289–93. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642009DN20400010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Moffat SD, Zonderman AB, Metter EJ, Kawas C, Blackman MR, Harman SM, Resnick SM. Free testosterone and risk for Alzheimer disease in older men. Neurology. 2004;62(2):188–93. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.62.2.188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Short RA, O’Brien PC, Graff-Radford NR, Bowen RL. Elevated gonadotropin levels in patients with Alzheimer disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76(9):906–9. https://doi.org/10.4065/76.9.906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hogervorst E, Bandelow S, Combrinck M, Smith AD. Low free testosterone is an independent risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Gerontol. 2004;39(11–12):1633–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2004.06.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Seidl JNT, Massman PJ. Relationships between testosterone levels and cognition in patients with Alzheimer disease and nondemented elderly men. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2015;28(1):27–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988714541872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Barrett-Connor E, Goodman-Gruen D, Patay B. Endogenous sex hormones and cognitive function in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(10):3681–5. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.84.10.6086.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Geerlings MI, Strozyk D, Masaki K, Remaley AT, Petrovitch H, Ross GW, et al. Endogenous sex hormones, cognitive decline, and future dementia in old men. Ann Neurol. 2006;60(3):346–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20918.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. LeBlanc ES, Wang PY, Janowsky JS, Neiss MB, Fink HA, Yaffe K, et al. Association between sex steroids and cognition in elderly men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010;72(3):393–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03692.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gouras GK, Xu H, Gross RS, Greenfield JP, Hai B, Wang R, et al. Testosterone reduces neuronal secretion of Alzheimer’s β-amyloid peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(3):1202–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.3.1202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pike CJ. Testosterone attenuates β-amyloid toxicity in cultured hippocampal neurons. Brain Res. 2001;919(1):160–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(01)03024-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ramsden M, Nyborg AC, Murphy MP, Chang L, Stanczyk FZ, Golde TE, Pike CJ. Androgens modulate β-amyloid levels in male rat brain. J Neurochem. 2003;87(4):1052–5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02114.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Papasozomenos SC. The heat shock-induced hyperphosphorylation of τ is estrogen-independent and prevented by androgens: Implications for Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(13):6612–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.13.6612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Papasozomenos SC, Shanavas A. Testosterone prevents the heat shock-induced overactivation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β but not of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase and concomitantly abolishes hyperphosphorylation of τ: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(3):1140–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.032646799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Brown CM, Xu Q, Okhubo N, Vitek MP, Colton CA. Androgen-mediated immune function is altered by the apolipoprotein E gene. Endocrinology. 2007;148(7):3383–90. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2006-1200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Colton CA, Brown CM, Vitek MP. Sex steroids, APOE genotype and the innate immune system. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26(3):363–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.08.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pfankuch T, Rizk A, Olsen R, Poage C, Raber J. Role of circulating androgen levels in effects of APOE-e4 on cognitive function. Brain Res. 2005;1053(1–2):88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.06.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Raber J, Bongers G, LeFevour A, Buttini M, Mucke L. Androgens protect against apolipoprotein E4-induced cognitive deficits. J Neurosci. 2002;22(12):5204–9. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-12-05204.2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Panizzon MS, Hauger R, Dale AM, Eaves LJ, Eyler LT, Fischl B, et al. Testosterone modifies the effect of APOE genotype on hippocampal volume in middle-aged men. Neurology. 2010;75(10):874–80. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f11deb.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Panizzon MS, Hauger R, Xian H, Vuoksimaa E, Spoon KM, Mendoza SP, et al. Interaction of APOE genotype and testosterone on episodic memory in middle-aged men. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(7):1778-e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.12.025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hogervorst E, De Jager C, Budge M, Smith AD. Serum levels of estradiol and testosterone and performance in different cognitive domains in healthy elderly men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004;29(3):405–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(03)00053-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sundermann EE, Panizzon MS, Chen X, Andrews M, Galasko D, Banks SJ, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Sex differences in Alzheimer’s-related Tau biomarkers and a mediating effect of testosterone. Biol Sex Differ. 2020;11:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-020-00310-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Petersen RC, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Donohue MC, Gamst AC, Harvey DJ, et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): clinical characterization. Neurology. 2010;74(3):201–9. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cb3e25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bondi MW, Edmonds EC, Jak AJ, Clark LR, Delano-Wood L, McDonald CR, et al. Neuropsychological criteria for mild cognitive impairment improves diagnostic precision, biomarker associations, and progression rates. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;42(1):275–89. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-140276.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology. 1984;34(7):939–44. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.34.7.939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Fabbri E, An Y, Gonzalez-Freire M, Zoli M, Maggio M, Studenski SA, et al. Bioavailable testosterone linearly declines over a wide age spectrum in men and women from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71(9):1202–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glw021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Simpson ER, Davis SR. Minireview: aromatase and the regulation of estrogen biosynthesis—some new perspectives. Endocrinology. 2001;142(11):4589–94. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.142.11.8547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cui J, Shen Y, Li R. Estrogen synthesis and signaling pathways during aging: from periphery to brain. Trends Mol Med. 2013;19(3):197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2012.12.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Misso ML, Jang C, Adams J, Tran J, Murata Y, Bell R, et al. Adipose aromatase gene expression is greater in older women and is unaffected by postmenopausal estrogen therapy. Menopause. 2005;12(2):210–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042192-200512020-00016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Adashi EY. The climacteric ovary as a functional gonadotropin-driven androgen-producing gland. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(1):20–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56810-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Overlie I, Moen M, Morkrid L, Skjæraasen J, Holte A. The endocrine transition around menopause-a five years prospective study with profiles of gonadotropines, estrogens, androgens and SHBG among healthy women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78(7):642–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1600-0412.1999.780714.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nelson LR, Bulun SE. Estrogen production and action. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45(3 Suppl):S116–24. https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2001.117432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Craig MC, Murphy DG. Oestrogen, cognition and the maturing female brain. J Neuroendocrinol. 2007;19(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2826.2006.01500.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Brinton RD. 17β-Estradiol induction of filopodial growth in cultured hippocampal neurons within minutes of exposure. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1993;4(1):36–46. https://doi.org/10.1006/mcne.1993.1005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Woolley CS, Weiland NG, McEwen BS, Schwartzkroin PA. Estradiol increases the sensitivity of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells to NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic input: correlation with dendritic spine density. J Neurosci. 1997;17(5):1848–59. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-05-01848.1997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Tanapat P, Hastings NB, Reeves AJ, Gould E. Estrogen stimulates a transient increase in the number of new neurons in the dentate gyrus of the adult female rat. J Neurosci. 1999;19(14):5792–801. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-05792.1999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Jaffe AB, Toran-Allerand CD, Greengard P, Gandy SE. Estrogen regulates metabolism of Alzheimer amyloid beta precursor protein. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(18):13065–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(17)36796-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Pontifex MG, Martinsen A, Saleh RNM, Harden G, Tejera N, Müller M, et al. APOE-E4 genotype exacerbates the impact of menopause on cognition and synaptic plasticity in APOE-TR mice. FASEB J. 2021;35(5): e21583. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202002621RR.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Boyle CP, Raji CA, Erickson KI, Lopez OL, Becker JT, Gach HM, et al. Estrogen, brain structure, and cognition in postmenopausal women. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42(1):24–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Valencia-Olvera AC, Maldonado Weng J, Christensen A, LaDu MJ, Pike CJ. Role of estrogen in women’s Alzheimer’s disease risk as modified by APOE. J Neuroendocrinol. 2023;35(2): e13209. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.13209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kramer JH, Delis DC, Daniel M. Sex differences in verbal learning. J Clin Psychol. 1988;44(6):907–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198811)44:6%3c907::AID-JCLP2270440610%3e3.0.CO;2-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Barrett-Connor E, Kritz-Silverstein D. Gender differences in cognitive function with age: the Rancho Bernardo study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(2):159–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb04573.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Aartsen MJ, Martin M, Zimprich D. Gender differences in level and change in cognitive functioning: results from the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. Gerontology. 2004;50(1):35–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000074387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Roivainen E. Gender differences in processing speed: a review of recent research. Learn Individ Differ. 2011;21(2):145–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Li R, Singh M. Sex differences in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014;35(3):385–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.01.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Sundermann EE, Biegon A, Rubin LH, Lipton RB, Mowrey W, Landau S, et al. Better verbal memory in women than men in MCI despite similar levels of hippocampal atrophy. Neurology. 2016;86(15):1368–76. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002570.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Digma LA, Madsen JR, Rissman RA, Jacobs DM, Brewer JB, Banks SJ, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Women can bear a bigger burden: ante- and post-mortem evidence for reserve in the face of tau. Brain Commun. 2020;2(1):fcaa025. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa025.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Greendale GA, Wight RG, Huang MH, Avis N, Gold EB, Joffe H, et al. Menopause-associated symptoms and cognitive performance: results from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(11):1214–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq067.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Epperson CN, Sammel MD, Freeman EW. Menopause effects on verbal memory: findings from a longitudinal community cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(9):3829–38. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-1808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Bojar I, Pinkas J, Wierzbińska-Stępniak A, Raczkiewicz D, Owoc A, Gujski M. Cognitive functions, concentration of endogenous estradiol, estrogen receptor α (ERα) polymorphism in postmenopausal women. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:3469–78. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.901247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Kilpi F, Soares ALG, Fraser A, Nelson SM, Sattar N, Fallon SJ, Tilling K, Lawlor DA. Changes in six domains of cognitive function with reproductive and chronological ageing and sex hormones: a longitudinal study in 2411 UK mid-life women. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01040-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Yaffe K, Lui LY, Grady D, Cauley J, Kramer J, Cummings SR. Cognitive decline in women in relation to non-protein-bound oestradiol concentrations. Lancet. 2000;356(9231):708–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02628-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Janowsky JS, Oviatt SK, Orwoll ES. Testosterone influences spatial cognition in older men. Behav Neurosci. 1994;108(2):325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.108.2.325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Cherrier MM, Asthana S, Plymate S, Baker L, Matsumoto AM, Peskind E, et al. Testosterone supplementation improves spatial and verbal memory in healthy older men. Neurology. 2001;57(1):80–8. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.57.1.80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Driscoll I, Hamilton DA, Yeo RA, Brooks WM, Sutherland RJ. Virtual navigation in humans: the impact of age, sex, and hormones on place learning. Horm Behav. 2005;47(3):326–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Thilers PP, MacDonald SW, Herlitz A. The association between endogenous free testosterone and cognitive performance: a population-based study in 35 to 90 year-oldmen and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006;31(5):565–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.12.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Haren MT, Wittert GA, Chapman IM, Coates P, Morley JE. Effect of oral testosterone undecanoate on visuospatial cognition, mood and quality of life in elderly men with low-normal gonadal status. Maturitas. 2005;50(2):124–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.05.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Fonda SJ, Bertrand R, O’Donnell A, Longcope C, McKinlay JB. Age, hormones, and cognitive functioning among middle-aged and elderly men: cross-sectional evidence from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(3):385–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/60.3.385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Wu FC, Tajar A, Beynon JM, Pye SR, Silman AJ, Finn JD, et al. Identification of late-onset hypogonadism in middle-aged and elderly men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:123–35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0911101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. McBride JA, Carson CC 3rd, Coward RM. Testosterone deficiency in the aging male. Ther Adv Urol. 2016;8(1):47–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287215612961.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Lunenfeld B, Mskhalaya G, Kalinchenko S, Tishova Y. Recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of late-onset hypogonadism in men—a suggested update. Aging Male. 2013;16(4):143–50. https://doi.org/10.3109/13685538.2013.853731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Maganty A, Shoag JE, Ramasamy R. Testosterone threshold–does one size fit all? Aging Male. 2015;18(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/13685538.2015.1004047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Gutai J, Laporte R, Kuller L, Dai W, Falvo-Gerard L, Caggiula A. Plasma testosterone, high density lipoprotein cholesterol and other lipoprotein fractions. Am J Cardiol. 1981;48(5):897–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(81)90356-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. von Eckardstein A, Wu FC. Testosterone and atherosclerosis. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2003;13(Suppl A):S72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-6374(03)00059-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Phillips MC. Apolipoprotein E isoforms and lipoprotein metabolism. IUBMB Life. 2014;66(9):616–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.1314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Malkin CJ, Pugh PJ, Jones RD, Kapoor D, Channer KS, Jones TH. The effect of testosterone replacement on endogenous inflammatory cytokines and lipid profiles in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(7):3313–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-031069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Maggio M, Basaria S, Ble A, Lauretani F, Bandinelli S, Ceda GP, et al. Correlation between testosterone and the inflammatory marker soluble interleukin-6 receptor in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(1):345–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-1097.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Uchoa MF, Moser VA, Pike CJ. Interactions between inflammation, sex steroids, and Alzheimer’s disease risk factors. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2016;43:60–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2016.09.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Lynch JR, Tang W, Wang H, Vitek MP, Bennett ER, Sullivan PM, et al. APOE genotype and an ApoE-mimetic peptide modify the systemic and central nervous system inflammatory response. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(49):48529–33. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M306923200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Vitek MP, Brown CM, Colton CA. APOE genotype-specific differences in the innate immune response. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30(9):1350–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.11.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Schaeffer V, Patte-Mensah C, Eckert A, Mensah-Nyagan AG. Modulation of neurosteroid production in human neuroblastoma cells by Alzheimer’s disease key proteins. J Neurobiol. 2006;66(8):868–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.20267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Schaeffer V, Meyer L, Patte-Mensah C, Eckert A, Mensah-Nyagan AG. Dose-dependent and sequence-sensitive effects of amyloid-β peptide on neurosteroidogenesis in human neuroblastoma cells. Neurochem Int. 2008;52(6):948–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2008.01.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Tan S, Sohrabi HR, Weinborn M, Tegg M, Bucks RS, Taddei K, et al. Effects of testosterone supplementation on separate cognitive domains in cognitively healthy older men: a meta-analysis of current randomized clinical trials. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;27(11):1232–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2019.05.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Bianchi VE. Impact of testosterone on Alzheimer’s disease. World J Mens Health. 2022;40(2):243. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.210175.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Islam RM, Bell RJ, Green S, Davis SR. Effects of testosterone therapy for women: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0941-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Vingren JL, Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, Anderson JM, Volek JS, Maresh CM. Testosterone physiology in resistance exercise and training: the up-stream regulatory elements. Sports Med. 2010;40:1037–53. https://doi.org/10.2165/11536910-000000000-00000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Marx JO, Volek JS, Bush JA, Häkkinen K. Testosterone responses after resistance exercise in women: influence of regional fat distribution. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2001;11:465.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Copeland JL, Consitt LA, Tremblay MS. Hormonal responses to endurance and resistance exercise in females aged 19–69 years. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57(4):B158–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participants of ADNI, as without their efforts and participation, this work would not be possible. Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and/or provided data, but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found in Supplemental Data File and at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf.

Funding

This work was supported by the NIH [grant numbers R01AG074221, R01AG080663, P30AG062429, R01AG05064, R01AG063843, R21AG074214, R01AG066088]. Data collection and sharing for this project was funded by the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: AbbVie, Alzheimer’s Association; Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation; Araclon Biotech; BioClinica, Inc.; Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; CereSpir, Inc.; Cogstate; Eisai Inc.; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; EuroImmun; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.; Fujirebio; GE Healthcare; IXICO Ltd.; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.; Lumosity; Lundbeck; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.; NeuroRx Research; Neurotrack Technologies; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer Inc.; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; and Transition Therapeutics. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research is providing funds to support ADNI clinical sites in Canada. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute at the University of Southern California. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of Southern California.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA

    Melanie A. Dratva, Sarah J. Banks & Douglas Galasko

  2. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA

    Matthew S. Panizzon & Erin E. Sundermann

  3. Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92092, USA

    Matthew S. Panizzon

  4. UCSD ACTRI Building, 2W502-B8, 9452 Medical Center Drive (MC-0841), La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA

    Melanie A. Dratva

Authors
  1. Melanie A. Dratva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah J. Banks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew S. Panizzon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Douglas Galasko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Erin E. Sundermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Contributions

MAD: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal Analysis, Writing—Original Draft, Visualization. MSP: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Review and Editing. DG: Methodology, Writing—Review and Editing. SJB: Conceptualization, Writing—Review and Editing. EES: Conceptualization, Validation, Resources, Data Curation, Formal analyses Writing—Review and Editing, Supervision. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie A. Dratva.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of all participating ADNI sites, and written informed consent was obtained for all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

M. Dratva reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. S. Banks reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. M. Panizzon reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. D. Galasko reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. E. Sundermann reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dratva, M.A., Banks, S.J., Panizzon, M.S. et al. Low testosterone levels relate to poorer cognitive function in women in an APOE-ε4-dependant manner. Biol Sex Differ 15, 45 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-024-00620-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-024-00620-4

Keywords

Biology of Sex Differences

ISSN: 2042-6410

Contact us