Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Sex difference in clot lysability and association to coronary artery calcification

Biology of Sex Differences20189:9

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0168-8

  • Received: 8 December 2017
  • Accepted: 29 January 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) differ between sexes, and women experience CVD later than men. Changes in fibrin clot lysability are associated with CVD, and the present study addresses sex differences in fibrin clot lysability in asymptomatic middle-aged individuals and the relation to coronary artery calcification (CAC).

Methods

Participants free of morbidities and medication, N = 163, were randomly chosen from a national registry among citizens, 50 or 60 years of age, and were followed for 5 years. CAC was determined by the Agatston (Ag) score both at baseline and at follow-up. Based on the changes in Ag, the population was divided into two groups: ΔAg = 0 U or ΔAg > 0 U. Fibrin clot analyses were based on turbidimetric methods.

Results

At baseline, 116 women and 97 men were included; 84 women and 79 men completed the 5-year follow-up (77%). Independently of covariates, women with ΔAg > 0 had reduced mean (SD) fibrin lysability at follow-up, 40.2% (15.9), both in comparison to baseline, 47.8% (20.4), p = 0.001, to women with ΔAg = 0 U, 51.2% (24.5), p = 0.028, and to men with ΔAg > 0 U, 54.4% (21.0), p = 0.002.

Conclusions

Fibrin clot lysability changes over time with considerable sex differences. Women with progression of CAC have reduced fibrin clot lysability compared to men, indicating a sex-specific association between morphological vessel wall changes and fibrin clot lysability.

Keywords

  • Sex difference
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Coronary artery calcification
  • Fibrin clot lysability

Background

The incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) differ between sexes, and women experience CVD later than men [1]. These epidemiological observations have been the fundament for studies searching for sex differences in biochemical [2] and morphological [3] characteristics in the subclinical phase of the disease.

The preponderance of studies have shown that premenopausal women have a favorable lipid profile, lower blood pressure levels, and less coronary artery calcification (CAC) compared with age-matched men [4, 5]. After the menopause the condition changes towards alignment with the age-dependent changes observed in men [6], probably due to the lack of the protecting effects of estrogens in post-menopausal women [7, 8]. Studies have indicated that although the debut of CVD is postponed, the short-term mortality after myocardial infarction (MI) is higher in women younger than 75 years old than in age-matched men [9]. The causes of these findings are unclear [10], but fibrin may in this context play an important role, as it is a matrix for tissue repair and has been shown to contribute to plaque growth in a multitude of ways [1113]. Therefore, it might be of relevance to explore alterations in fibrin clot lysability in relation to development of CAC as a surrogate marker of CVD.

More than two decades ago, Fatah et al. observed a connection between abnormal fibrin architecture in men with MI compared to healthy controls [14]. Since then, studies have elaborated the link between CVD and altered fibrin structure and clot lysability in different patient categories [1519]. Most of these studies have shown that defect fibrin clot lysability is associated with the evolution of CVD [15, 17, 20, 21]. However, sex differences in fibrin clot lysability have not been thoroughly evaluated, and the relation to coronary atherosclerosis is still speculative.

Consequently, in the present cross-sectional cohort study, we examined sex differences and changes over time in fibrin clot lysability in asymptomatic middle-aged individuals. Furthermore, we addressed the potential association between fibrin clot lysability and CAC.

Methods

Study design and participants

This cross-sectional cohort study with follow-up recruiting participants from the Danish Risk Score (DanRisk) study [22] was performed at four hospitals (Svendborg, Odense, Vejle, and Esbjerg) in Southern Denmark from 2009 to 2010. Study participants were randomly chosen from the Danish Central Person Registry among citizens born either in 1949 or 1959. The present study focuses on participants recruited from Esbjerg [23]. In brief, 458 participants were invited at baseline, of whom 329 (72%) accepted the invitation. After exclusion of individuals with symptomatic CVD (angina, myocardial infarction, treatment with percutaneous coronary revascularization or coronary by-pass surgery), atrial fibrillation, stroke, peripheral artery disease, heart valve disease, and diabetes or taking any kind of medication, a total of 213 (47%) comprised the study population at baseline. After 5 years, all 213 participants were re-invited to a follow-up assessment, and 163 (77%) participants were re-examined and thus constituted the final population.

Prior to examination, the participants filled in a questionnaire concerning medical history, family history with CVD, and smoking habits. In addition, participants were interviewed about the same topics. Physical examination included BMI calculations based on measurements of height and weight, waist circumference, blood pressure and pulse (average of three measurements after 5 min of rest), and an ECG.

Cardiac CT

All CT scans both at baseline and at follow-up were analyzed by the same experienced cardiologist, who was blinded to all other patient data. CAC was expressed as Agatston (Ag) score [24]. The internal validity of the calcium scoring was high [22]. Non-contrast scan data were acquired during an inspiratory breath hold.

Ag at baseline was assessed by a Toshiba 64-slice CT-scanner (Aquilion, Toshiba Medical Systems). The following technical settings were used: gantry rotation time 450 ms, collimation 64 × 0.5 mm, slice thickness 3 mm, 120 kV tube voltage, 240 mA tube current, and prospective gating at 75% of the R-R interval. At follow-up, Ag was assessed using a Philips 64-slice scanner (Brilliance 64, Philips Healthcare). The following technical settings were used: gantry rotation time 400 ms, collimation 64 × 0.625 mm, slice thickness 2.5 mm, 120 kV tube voltage, 220 mA tube current, and prospective gating at 75% of the R-R interval. The mean (SD, range, k-factor) estimated radiation dose at baseline was 1.36 mSv (0.54, 0.49–3.06 mSv, 0.0145), and the mean (SD, range, k-factor) estimated radiation dose at follow-up was 1.09 mSv (0.31, 0.48–2.22 mSv, 0.0145).

The study population was separated into two groups based on the numeric difference between Ag at follow-up and baseline: ΔAg = 0 U or ΔAg > 0 U.

Blood collection and handling

Blood samples were drawn from an antecubital vein into sterile vacuum plastic tubes containing either 0.109 mol/L citrate or no anticoagulants, and the plasma or serum isolated after 20 min of centrifugation at 2000g at 20 °C were frozen and stored in aliquots at − 80 °C until analysis.

Biochemical analysis

Lipids were analyzed using Cholesterol, Direct LDL, Ultra HDL, and Triglycerides kits employing the Architect C16000 analyzer. Kits and analyzer were from Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany. Concentrations of CRP and fibrinogen were determined on a BN-II nephelometer using antibodies and reagents from Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics GmbH, Marburg, Germany. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) antigen, was quantitatively determined by a sandwich enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) using in-house specific antibodies as previously described [25] employing a microplate reader (Tecan Trading AG, Basle, Switzerland).

Fibrin clot lysis was recorded using turbidity measurements as previously described [20]. In brief, citrate-stabilized plasma was mixed with thrombin, CaCl2, and Tween 80 and incubated overnight in a microtiter plate sealed with adhesive tape. All clots were made in duplicate. To initiate fibrinolysis, t-PA and flufenamic acid were added onto the clots. The 405-nm optical density (OD) was then followed on a Sunrise plate reader (Tecan Austria, Grödig/Salzburg, Austria) every 5 min for 4 h at 25 °C. The rate of fibrinolysis per hour was determined from the slope of the curve at the time when the slope became constant and was normalized with respect to the maximum absorbency value before lysis initiation.

Statistics

Continuous variables are presented as means and standard deviations (SD) or median and interquartile ranges (IQR) as appropriate. Normality was examined by the Shapiro-Wilk test as well as by visually assessing histograms and Q-Q plots. If possible, non-normally distributed variables were log-transformed to achieve normality. Dichotomous variables are shown as numbers and percentages. Student’s t test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous variables and the Mann-Whitney test for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous variables. The χ2 test was performed for comparison of dichotomous variables. The paired Student’s t test was used for paired comparison of normally distributed continuous variables, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for paired comparison of non-normally distributed continuous variables. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Covariates were identified as variables which were significantly different between the sexes in the univariate analyses and correlated with fibrin clot lysability using the Spearman correlation test. A linear regression model using fibrin clot lysability as the dependent variable was created, and the model was adjusted for identified covariates. To ensure model validation, Q-Q plots for residuals were inspected for normality. Stata 15.0, StataCorp, TX, USA, was used for statistical analyses.

Results

Baseline and follow-up characteristics

Participants were followed for a mean (range) of 5.5 years (5.2–5.7 years). At baseline, 116 women and 97 men were included and 84 women and 79 men completed the follow-up. Study population characteristics at baseline and follow-up are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Women had lower levels of systolic and diastolic blood pressures, lower levels of triglycerides, higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, and lower Ag compared to men (all p <  0.05) both at baseline and follow-up, while C-reactive protein (CRP) was comparable between men and women. Body mass index (BMI) was lower in women at baseline (p = 0.039) but comparable among men and women at follow-up, while fibrinogen was higher in women at baseline (p = 0.008) and comparable among men and women at follow-up. ΔAg was significantly lower in women than in men (p = 0.012). ΔAg = 0 U was observed in 85 participants (53 women). ΔAg > 0 U was observed in 78 participants (31 women); of these, 23 participants (10 women) had ΔAg = 1–10 U, 35 participants (12 women) had ΔAg = 11–100, and 20 participants (9 women) had ΔAg > 100 U. Negative ΔAg observed in eight participants was classified as ΔAg = 0 U.
Table 1

Study population characteristics at baseline

Baseline, N = 163

Men (n = 79)

Women (n = 84)

p value

Born

 1949 (n = 70)

30 (43)

40 (57)

 

 1959 (n = 93)

49 (53)

44 (47)

0.21

Tobacco use

 Never (n =77)

35 (45)

42 (55)

 

 Prior/current (n = 86)

44 (51)

42 (49)

0.53

Systolic blood pressure, mmHg

Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg

140 (15)

82 (9)

132 (19)

78 (9)

0.007

0.002

Body mass index, kg/m2

27.4 (3.6)

26.1 (4.6)

0.039

Agatston score, U

0 (0–33)

0 (0–7)

0.012

Total cholesterol, mmol/l

LDL cholesterol, mmol/l

HDL cholesterol, mmol/l

Triglycerides, mmol/l

5.42 (0.97)

3.34 (0.82)

1.26 (1.02–1.54)

1.47 (0.80)

5.54 (1.07)

3.23 (0.91)

1.52 (1.35–1.85)

1.14 (0.60)

0.44

0.39

< 0.001

0.003

C-reactive protein, mg/l

0.74 (0.36–1.61)

0.72 (0.29–1.86)

0.67

Fibrinogen, μmol/l

8.9 (7.9–9.9)

9.6 (8.5–10.9)

0.008

PAI-1, ng/ml

16.5 (11.2–24.4)

12.5 (6.7–20.2)

0.016

Fibrin clot lysability, %

54.8 (19.7)

51.5 (22.2)

0.32

Values are presented as mean (SD), median (IQR), or number (%). Information on C-reactive protein is missing on three participants. Information on PAI-1 is missing on four participants

LDL low-density lipoprotein, HDL high-density lipoprotein, PAI-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1

Table 2

Study population characteristics at follow-up

Follow-up, N = 163

Men (n = 79)

Women (n = 84)

p value

Born

 1949 (n = 70)

30 (43)

40 (57)

 

 1959 (n = 93)

49 (53)

44 (47)

0.21

Tobacco use

 Never (n = 76)

34 (45)

42 (55)

 

 Prior/current (n = 87)

45 (52)

42 (48)

0.47

Systolic blood pressure, mmHg

Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg

140 (17)

81 (8)

133 (16)

72 (9)

0.013

< 0.001

Body mass index, kg/m2

28.1 (4.2)

26.9 (4.7)

0.063

Agatston score, U

9 (0–115)

0 (0–26)

0.002

ΔAgatston score, U

4 (0–49)

0 (0–10)

0.012

Total cholesterol, mmol/l

LDL cholesterol, mmol/l

HDL cholesterol, mmol/l

Triglycerides, mmol/l

5.31 (0.85)

3.33 (0.80)

1.30 (1.10–1.40)

1.82 (0.97)

5.54 (0.92)

3.30 (0.93)

1.55 (1.40–1.75)

1.50 (0.89)

0.10

0.80

< 0.001

0.032

C-reactive protein, mg/l

0.74 (0.46–1.61)

0.70 (0.30–2.18)

0.74

Fibrinogen, μmol/l

8.9 (7.7–10.3)

9.5 (8.4–11.1)

0.056

PAI-1, ng/ml

21.7 (15.4–27.5)

20.1 (15.0–30.3)

0.69

Fibrin clot lysability, %

52.1 (20.5)

47.2 (22.3)

0.14

Values are presented as mean (SD), median (IQR), or number (%). Information on Agatston score is missing on one participant

LDL low-density lipoprotein, HDL high-density lipoprotein, PAI-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1

Fibrin clot lysability

Women with ΔAg > 0 U had reduced mean (SD) clot lysability at follow-up compared to baseline, 40.2% (15.9) versus 47.8% (20.4) (p = 0.001) (Fig. 1). There was no difference in clot lysability between baseline and follow-up in women with ΔAg > 0 U or in men. As shown in Figs. 2 and 3, at follow-up, women with ΔAg > 0 U had reduced mean (SD) clot lysability, 40.2% (15.9), compared to men with ΔAg > 0 U, 54.4% (21.0) (p = 0.002), and compared to women with ΔAg = 0 U, 51.2% (24.5) (p = 0.028). No difference in fibrin clot lysability between men with ΔAg = 0 U and ΔAg > 0 U was observed. Only triglycerides (r = − 0.168, p = 0.032), fibrinogen (r = − 0.444, p <  0.001), and PAI-1 (r = − 0.223, p = 0.004) correlated with fibrin clot lysability. Adjusting for the confounding effect of fibrinogen, triglycerides, and PAI-1 showed that the observed reduced fibrin clot lysability in women with ΔAg > 0 U compared to women with ΔAg = 0 U and men with ΔAg > 0 U was independent of covariation (p = 0.028 and p = 0.013, respectively).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Clot lysability in women with ΔAgatston score > 0 U at baseline and follow-up (N = 31). Variables are compared using the paired Student’s t test. Mean and SD are indicated in bars

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Clot lysability in men (N = 47) and women (N = 31) with ΔAgatston score > 0 U at follow-up. Variables are compared using the unpaired Student’s t test. Mean and SD are indicated in bars

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Clot lysability in women with ΔAgatston score = 0 U (N = 53) and ΔAgatston score > 0 U (N = 31) at follow-up. Variables are compared using the unpaired Student’s t test. Mean and SD are indicated in bars

Discussion

In the present prospective cross-sectional cohort study, comprising apparently healthy middle-aged individuals, we demonstrate significantly reduced fibrin clot lysability during a 5-year follow-up in women with progression of CAC. Furthermore, women with progression of CAC had reduced clot lysability compared to men as well as compared to women without progression of CAC, as these subgroups had no significant alterations in clot lysability over time. These findings were independent of confounding covariates.

Although several hypotheses have been suggested as the potential cause for sex differences in the natural history of CVD, basic mechanisms are still unknown. In this perspective, a positive correlation between high fibrinogen levels in young adulthood and incidence of CAC later in life has been reported in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study [13], and other studies have reported an association between high fibrinogen levels and thrombosis [26]. In general, women have higher plasma concentration of fibrinogen than age-matched men [27], and fibrinogen as a precursor of fibrin is considered to be an important determinant of the fibrin structure [28]. A prothrombotic effect of increased fibrinogen is probably closely linked to alterations in fibrin structure [29, 30] causing fibrin to be more resistant to lysis. In the present study, we observed differences in fibrinogen concentrations between sexes at baseline but not at follow-up, and although the fibrinogen concentration correlated with clot lysability, the sex-related differences in clot lysability remained significant after adjustment for the potential confounding effect of fibrinogen. These findings indicate that other factors than fibrinogen are responsible for the observed differences in fibrin clot lysability.

We have previously shown that women with atrial fibrillation differ in fibrin polymerization characteristics compared to men [18] and that women receiving OC have alterations in fibrin structure and increased clot lysability [31]. Moreover, middle-aged women receiving estrogen therapy have a reduced burden of CAC compared to women receiving placebo [32]. We therefore hypothesize that the reduced wall repair mechanisms and increasing CAC observed in women after menopause [8] may partly be due to altered fibrin lysability. Thus, a reduction of more than 20% in fibrin clot lysability recorded in women with CAC progression may contribute to the different cardiovascular pathophysiology observed in women after the menopause.

In addition, clinical studies suggest that fibrinogen and fibrin deposits in atherosclerotic plaques, and not circulating fibrinogen, contribute to plaque growth and stability by stimulating migration and proliferation of smooth muscle cells as well as creating a matrix for the calcium deposits in the growing plaque [1113]. As both fibrinogen and fibrin are present in early as well as advanced atherosclerotic plaques [33], a reduced fibrin clot lysability may play a central role in plaque growth and remodeling, with important influence in wound healing and vascular remodeling [34]. In the modern context of Virchow’s triad [35], the present study might therefore be of interest, as we report a correlation between CAC as an abnormality in the vessel wall and a concomitant reduced clot lysability occurring only in women.

Limitations

Negative ΔAg was recorded in eight participants and was registered as ΔAg = 0 U, and of these, five participants had a decrease in Ag ≥ 10 U. However, repeat analysis after exclusion of all eight participants did not change our findings. Several studies report difficulties in assessing CAC progression and definition of subgroups based on progression in CAC [3639]. Our subgroup analysis showed a trend towards decreased fibrin clot lysability with increasing ΔAg in women compared to men; however, the number of participants in each group is limited. Further research in a larger population is needed to perform subgroup analyses. The hormonal status in the women was unknown, but no significant differences in clot lysability between the two age cohorts in women at both baseline and follow-up were observed. At the study inclusion, women taking any kind of hormone replacement therapy were excluded. Scanners from different vendors were used to assess CAC at baseline and follow-up. However, according to Willemink et al., both the median relative difference of Ag and the reclassification rate between the Philips and Toshiba scanners used in the present study were low [40]. Fifty study participants were not re-examined at follow-up, and clinical information on these participants are not available. However, these participants were comparable to the study participants who were re-assessed in terms of cardiovascular risk factors and Ag at baseline.

Conclusion

Women with progression of CAC over 5 years have reduced clot lysability compared to men. In addition, these women have reduced clot lysability compared to women with no development of CAC. This study suggests that fibrin clot lysability plays a role in the evolution of CVD.

Abbreviations

Ag: 

Agatston score

BMI: 

Body mass index

CAC: 

Coronary artery calcification

CAD: 

Coronary artery disease

CARDIA: 

Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

CT: 

Computed tomography

CVD: 

Cardiovascular disease

HDL: 

High-density lipoprotein

IQR: 

Interquartile range

LDL: 

Low-density lipoprotein

MI: 

Myocardial infarction

OC: 

Oral contraceptives

SD: 

Standard deviation

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to the study participants for their participation in the current study. We thank Anette Larsen and Kathrine Overgaard, Unit for Thrombosis Research, University of Southern Denmark, and the staff of the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hospital of South West Denmark, Esbjerg, for the skillful biochemical analysis. We are indebted to the dedicated staff at the Departments of Cardiology and Radiology, Hospital of South West Denmark, Esbjerg. The authors thank Pia V. Larsen, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, for valuable statistical assistance.

Funding

This work was supported by the Cardiac Research Fund, Hospital of South West Denmark, Esbjerg; Institute of Regional Health Research: Centre South West Jutland, Hospital of South West Denmark, Esbjerg; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark; Edith and Vagn Hedegaard Jensen Foundation, Esbjerg, Denmark; and Karola Jørgensens Research Foundation, Esbjerg, Denmark. The sponsors only provided financial support for the conduct of the research and the preparation of the manuscript and had no influence in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing and submitting the present manuscript for publication.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not available due to the individual privacy of the study participants. Datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

RR designed the study; collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data; and wrote the manuscript. NPRS, JJS, and JBG conceived and designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, contributed to the discussion, and reviewed the manuscript. Additionally, NPRS assisted in collecting and analyzing the cardiac CT data, JJS was responsible for the biochemical analyses and helped review the figures and the statistics, and JBG was responsible for the biochemical analyses. BLN conceived and designed the study, contributed to the discussion, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in the study were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Regional Scientific Ethics Committee for Southern Denmark and with the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The protocol was approved by the Regional Scientific Ethics Committee for Southern Denmark, reference number S20080140 and S20130169 (45023). Written informed consent for study participation and publication of study results were obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing interests

Author Bjarne L. Nørgaard has received research grant from Siemens, Edwards Lifesciences and Heartflow. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Cardiology, Hospital of South West Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
(2)
Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
(3)
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hospital of South West Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
(4)
Unit for Thrombosis Research, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
(5)
Department of Cardiology, Skejby University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

References

  1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Franco S, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(3):e28–e292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Daniels LB, Maisel AS. Cardiovascular biomarkers and sex: the case for women. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(10):588–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Merz AA, Cheng S. Sex differences in cardiovascular ageing. Heart. 2016;102(11):825–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kardys I, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Witteman JC. The female advantage in cardiovascular disease: do vascular beds contribute equally? Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(4):403–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jonsdottir LS, Sigfusson N, Gudnason V, Sigvaldason H, Thorgeirsson G. Do lipids, blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking confer equal risk of myocardial infarction in women as in men? The Reykjavik study. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2002;9(2):67–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pardhe BD, Ghimire S, Shakya J, Pathak S, Shakya S, Bhetwal A, Khanal PR, Parajuli NP. Elevated cardiovascular risks among postmenopausal women: a community based case control study from Nepal. Biochem Res Int. 2017;2017:3824903.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Lerner DJ, Kannel WB. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J. 1986;111(2):383–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Vitale C, Mendelsohn ME, Rosano GM. Gender differences in the cardiovascular effect of sex hormones. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009;6(8):532–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Vaccarino V, Parsons L, Every NR, Barron HV, Krumholz HM. Sex-based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Participants. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(4):217–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hvelplund A, Galatius S, Madsen M, Rasmussen JN, Rasmussen S, Madsen JK, Sand NP, Tilsted HH, Thayssen P, Sindby E, et al. Women with acute coronary syndrome are less invasively examined and subsequently less treated than men. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(6):684–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith EB. Fibrinogen, fibrin and fibrin degradation products in relation to atherosclerosis. Clin Haematol. 1986;15(2):355–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Borissoff JI, Spronk HM, ten Cate H. The hemostatic system as a modulator of atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(18):1746–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Green D, Chan C, Kang J, Liu K, Schreiner P, Jenny NS, Tracy RP. Longitudinal assessment of fibrinogen in relation to subclinical cardiovascular disease: the CARDIA study. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(3):489–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fatah K, Silveira A, Tornvall P, Karpe F, Blomback M, Hamsten A. Proneness to formation of tight and rigid fibrin gel structures in men with myocardial infarction at a young age. Thromb Haemost. 1996;76(4):535–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Collet JP, Allali Y, Lesty C, Tanguy ML, Silvain J, Ankri A, Blanchet B, Dumaine R, Gianetti J, Payot L, et al. Altered fibrin architecture is associated with hypofibrinolysis and premature coronary atherothrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26(11):2567–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Schuett K, Savvaidis A, Maxeiner S, Lysaja K, Jankowski V, Schirmer SH, Dimkovic N, Boor P, Kaesler N, Dekker FW, et al. Clot structure: a potent mortality risk factor in patients on hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(5):1622–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Skov J, Sidelmann JJ, Bladbjerg EM, Jespersen J, Gram J. Lysability of fibrin clots is a potential new determinant of stroke risk in atrial fibrillation. Thromb Res. 2014;134(3):717–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gram J, Skov J, Bladbjerg EM, Sidelmann J, Jespersen J. Gender differences in fibrin polymerization and lysability of fibrin in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(2):292–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Undas A, Szuldrzynski K, Stepien E, Zalewski J, Godlewski J, Tracz W, Pasowicz M, Zmudka K. Reduced clot permeability and susceptibility to lysis in patients with acute coronary syndrome: effects of inflammation and oxidative stress. Atherosclerosis. 2008;196(2):551–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sjoland JA, Sidelmann JJ, Brabrand M, Pedersen RS, Pedersen JH, Esbensen K, Standeven KF, Ariens RA, Gram J. Fibrin clot structure in patients with end-stage renal disease. Thromb Haemost. 2007;98(2):339–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Collet JP, Mishal Z, Lesty C, Mirshahi M, Peyne J, Baumelou A, Bensman A, Soria J, Soria C. Abnormal fibrin clot architecture in nephrotic patients is related to hypofibrinolysis: influence of plasma biochemical modifications: a possible mechanism for the high thrombotic tendency? Thromb Haemost. 1999;82(5):1482–9.Google Scholar
  22. Diederichsen AC, Sand NP, Norgaard B, Lambrechtsen J, Jensen JM, Munkholm H, Aziz A, Gerke O, Egstrup K, Larsen ML, et al. Discrepancy between coronary artery calcium score and HeartScore in middle-aged Danes: the DanRisk study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(3):558–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bjerrum IS, Sand NP, Poulsen MK, Nørgaard BL, Sidelmann JJ, Johansen A, Mickley H, Diederichsen AC. Non-invasive assessments reveal that more than half of randomly selected middle-aged individuals have evidence of subclinical atherosclerosis: a DanRisk substudy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29(2):301–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0091-8. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
  24. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(4):827–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gram AS, Bladbjerg EM, Skov J, Ploug T, Sjodin A, Rosenkilde M, Madsen DE, Stallknecht BM. Three months of strictly controlled daily endurance exercise reduces thrombin generation and fibrinolytic risk markers in younger moderately overweight men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;115(6):1331–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. de Moerloose P, Boehlen F, Neerman-Arbez M. Fibrinogen and the risk of thrombosis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2010;36(1):7–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vorster HH. Fibrinogen and women’s health. Thromb Res. 1999;95(4):137–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Weisel JW, Litvinov RI. Fibrin formation, structure and properties. Subcell Biochem. 2017;82:405–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Kotze RC, Ariens RA, de Lange Z, Pieters M. CVD risk factors are related to plasma fibrin clot properties independent of total and or gamma fibrinogen concentration. Thromb Res. 2014;134(5):963–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Undas A, Ariens RA. Fibrin clot structure and function: a role in the pathophysiology of arterial and venous thromboembolic diseases. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(12):e88–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sidelmann JJ, Kluft C, Krug AH, Winkler U, Jespersen J, Gram JB. Fibrin clot structure—pro-fibrinolytic effect of oral contraceptives in apparently healthy women. Thromb Haemost. 2017;117(4):700–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Manson JE, Allison MA, Rossouw JE, Carr JJ, Langer RD, Hsia J, Kuller LH, Cochrane BB, Hunt JR, Ludlam SE, et al. Estrogen therapy and coronary-artery calcification. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(25):2591–602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bini A, Fenoglio JJ Jr, Mesa-Tejada R, Kudryk B, Kaplan KL. Identification and distribution of fibrinogen, fibrin, and fibrin(ogen) degradation products in atherosclerosis. Use of monoclonal antibodies. Arteriosclerosis. 1989;9(1):109–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ariens RA. Fibrin(ogen) and thrombotic disease. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(Suppl 1):294–305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Watson T, Shantsila E, Lip GY. Mechanisms of thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation: Virchow’s triad revisited. Lancet. 2009;373(9658):155–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Budoff MJ, Hokanson JE, Nasir K, Shaw LJ, Kinney GL, Chow D, Demoss D, Nuguri V, Nabavi V, Ratakonda R, et al. Progression of coronary artery calcium predicts all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(12):1229–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Budoff MJ, Young R, Lopez VA, Kronmal RA, Nasir K, Blumenthal RS, Detrano RC, Bild DE, Guerci AD, Liu K, et al. Progression of coronary calcium and incident coronary heart disease events: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(12):1231–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Radford NB, DeFina LF, Barlow CE, Lakoski SG, Leonard D, Paixao AR, Khera A, Levine BD. Progression of CAC score and risk of incident CVD. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(12):1420–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. McEvoy JW, Blaha MJ, Defilippis AP, Budoff MJ, Nasir K, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR. Coronary artery calcium progression: an important clinical measurement? A review of published reports. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(20):1613–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Willemink MJ, Vliegenthart R, Takx RA, Leiner T, Budde RP, Bleys RL, Das M, Wildberger JE, Prokop M, Buls N, et al. Coronary artery calcification scoring with state-of-the-art CT scanners from different vendors has substantial effect on risk classification. Radiology. 2014;273(3):695–702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement