Skip to main content

Table 2 The comparison of EAT thickness (mm) between patients with and without CAS

From: The relationship between epicardial adipose tissue and coronary artery stenosis by sex and menopausal status in patients with suspected angina

 

Before adjustment

After adjustment

Patients without CAS

Patients with CAS

P value

Patients without CAS

Patients with CAS

P value*

Total population

6.59 ± 1.88

8.04 ± 2.39

< 0.001

6.70 ± 0.12

7.76 ± 0.14

< 0.001

Men

6.18 ± 1.78

7.84 ± 2.24

< 0.001

6.07 ± 0.22

7.52 ± 0.20

< 0.001

Women

6.79 ± 1.90

8.24 ± 2.53

< 0.001

6.98 ± 0.14

7.90 ± 0.19

< 0.001

Premenopause

5.68 ± 1.61

6.43 ± 1.23

0.171

5.70 ± 0.21

6.31 ± 0.47

0.244

Postmenopause

7.08 ± 1.87

8.40 ± 2.56

< 0.001

7.21 ± 0.16

8.19 ± 0.20

< 0.001

  1. The values were presented as mean ± standard deviation in the comparison between patients with and without CAS before adjustment and estimated marginal mean ± standard error presented for the values in the comparison between patients with and without CAS after adjustment
  2. EAT epicardial adipose tissue, CAS coronary artery stenosis, SE standard error
  3. *P value after adjustment factors that are related with EAT thickness, like age, diabetes, hypertension, and body mass index