Skip to main content

Table 1 Real-time QPCR validation of genes using hepatic samples in cohort 1

From: Bariatric surgery emphasizes biological sex differences in rodent hepatic lipid handling

Gene Name

Catalog #

Female

Male

Statistics (two-way ANOVA)

Sham

VSG

Sham

VSG

Lipid metabolism

ACOX1

Rn01460628_m1

100 ± 7a

75 ± 5b

91 ± 3

94 ± 7

p (surgery × sex) < 0.05

CD36

Rn01442639_m1

100 ± 10a

49 ± 6b

2 ± 1c

4 ± 1c

p (surgery × sex) < 0.001

CPT1A

Rn00580702_m1

100 ± 9

72 ± 11

90 ± 6

79 ± 12

NS

DGAT2

Rn00584870_m1

100 ± 6a

73 ± 6b

54 ± 4b

53.1 ± 4b

p (surgery × sex) < 0.05

FASN

Rn00569117_m1

100 ± 12

70 ± 11

17 ± 5

14 ± 2

p (sex) < 0.001

LDLR

Rn00598442_m1

100 ± 8a

64 ± 5c

29 ± 3b

31 ± 3b

p (surgery × sex) < 0.01;

MGAT

Rn00585985_s1

100 ± 4

82 ± 6

68 ± 5

67 ± 6

p (sex) < 0.001

PGC1

Rn00590984_m1

100 ± 12

104 ± 12

35 ± 3

68 ± 7

p (sex) < 0.001

PPARα

Rn00566193_m1

100 ± 9

59 ± 8

106 ± 10

102 ± 11

p (sex) < 0.05, p (surgery) < 0.05,

PPARγ

Rn00440945_m1

100 ± 13

67 ± 10

85 ± 13

75 ± 11

p(surgery) < 0.05

SREBP

Rn01495769_m1

100 ± 6

68 ± 7

70 ± 10

58 ± 5

p (surgery) < 0.05, p (sex) < 0.01

Cholesterol Metabolism

ACAT2

Rn01759928_g1

100 ± 11a

66 ± 7b

20 ± 1c

21 ± 3c

p (surgery × sex) < 0.05;

CYP7a1

Rn00564065_m1

100 ± 24

85 ± 11

40 ± 7

44 ± 15

p (sex) < 0.001

MTTP

Rn01522970_m1

100 ± 7a

64 ± 5b

35 ± 2c

37 ± 3c

p (surgery × sex) < 0.001

LRH1

Rn00572649_m1

100 ± 15a

57 ± 5b

91 ± 7a

92 ± 6a

p (surgery × sex) < 0.001

Receptors

Erα

Rn00433142_m1

100 ± 6a

75 ± 5b

81 ± 4b

76 ± 5b

p (surgery × sex) < 0.05

FGFR1

Rn00577234_m1

100 ± 10

106 ± 6

88 ± 5

116 ± 8

p (surgery) < 0.05

FXR

Rn00572658_m1

100 ± 7a

59 ± 8b

74 ± 6b

64 ± 5b

p (surgery × sex) < 0.05

Gluconeogenesis

G6PC

Rn01529640_g1

100 ± 4

80 ± 4

106 ± 6

93 ± 7

P(surgery) < 0.01

PCK1

Rn01529009_g1

100 ± 8

92 ± 12

158 ± 13

185 ± 16

P(sex) < 0.001

  1. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Groups with different superscript letters are significantly different via Tukey post hoc analysis