Fig. 4
From: Sex differences in learning and performing the Go/NoGo tasks
Actual NoGo holding time, reaction time and movement time in different regular stages. a The cumulative distribution of NH time in stage G1. The NH time was shorter for male rats than female rats with an effect size of − 0.34 (p = 2.22 × 10–158). b The cumulative distribution of NH time in stage G2. The statistical test revealed a significant difference between male and female rats with an effect size of 0.02 (p = 4.03 × 10–10). c The cumulative distribution of RTs in stage G2. The RTs of male rats were shorter than female rats with an effect size of − 0.14 (p = 3.17 × 10–162). d The cumulative distribution of MTs in stage G2. The MTs of male rats were shorter than the female rats with an effect size of − 0.63 (p = 6.85 × 10–172). e The cumulative distribution of NH time in stages G3–9. The NH time of the male rats was shorter in the later part than the female rats with an effect size of 0.05 (p = 2.75 × 10–5). f The cumulative distribution of RTs in stage G3–9. The RTs of male rats were shorter than the female rats with an effect size of − 0.56 (p = 7.57 × 10–125). g The cumulative distribution of MTs in stage G3–9. The MTs of female rats were longer than the male rats with an effect size of − 0.41 (p = 2.84 × 10–108). Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used for significance level detection