Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements

Bouffard, Jason; Yang, Chen; Begon, Mickael; Côté, Julie

doi:10.1186/s13293-018-0175-9

Biology of Sex Differences

Table 2 ANOVAs for joint kinematic variables

From: Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements

		Mean values			Movement-to-movement variability (SD)
		Fatigue	Sex	Sex × Fatigue	Fatigue	Sex	Sex × Fatigue
Elbow flexion	Range of motion	F_1,79 = 8.82	F_1,79 = 1.44	F_1,79 = 0.17	F_1,79 = 22.77	F_1,79 = 5.75	F_1,79 = 0.70
	Range of motion	p = 0.004	p = 0.234	p = 0.678	p < 0.001	p = 0.019	p = 0.407
	Average angle	F_1,79 = 8.27	F_1,79 = 0.11	F_1,79 = 0.57	F_1,79 = 3.06	F_1,79 = 11.39	F_1,79 = 0.19
	Average angle	p = 0.005	p = 0.741	p = 0.451	p = 0.195	p = 0.001	p = 0.662
HT plane	Range of motion	F_1,79 = 6.70	F_1,79 = 0.01	F_1,79 < 0.01	F_1,79 = 24.65	F_1,79 = 2.69	F_11,79 = 0.38
	Range of motion	p = 0.011	p = 0.910	p = 0.986	p < 0.001	p = 0.105	p = 0.537
	Average angle	F_1,79 = 8.57	F_1,79 = 2.98	F_1,79 = 0.64	F_1,79 = 9.42	F_1,79 = 1.22	F_1,79 = 0.49
	Average angle	p = 0.004	p = 0.088	p = 0.428	p = 0.003	p = 0.274	p = 0.484
HT elevation	Range of motion	F_1,79 = 25.89	F_1,79 = 0.84	F_1,79 = 0.96	F_1,79 = 21.39	F_1,79 = 0.70	F_1,79 = 0.50
	Range of motion	p < 0.001	p = 0.362	p = 0.331	p < 0.001	p = 0.404	p = 0.482
	Average angle	F_1,79 = 191.55	F_1,79 = 7.05	F_1,79 = 4.77	F_1,79 = 5.36	F_1,79 = 7.17	F_1,79 = 4.09
	Average angle	p < 0.001	p = 0.010	p = 0.032	p = 0.023	p = 0.009	p = 0.047
Trunk lateral flexion	Range of motion	F_1,79 = 55.56	F_1,79 = 0.48	F_1,79 = 0.10	F_1,79 = 51.01	F_1,79 = 1.31	F_1,79 = 1.07
	Range of motion	p < 0.001	p = 0.489	p = 0.757	p < 0.001	p = 0.256	p = 0.305
	Average angle	F_1,79 = 108.36	F_1,79 = 0.27	F_1,79 = 0.81	F_1,79 = 47.25	F_1,79 = 0.01	F_1,79 = 0.04
	Average angle	p < 0.001	p = 0.602	p = 0.128	p < 0.001	p = 0.944	p = 0.264
Trunk axial rotation	Range of motion	F_1,79 = 87.18	F_1,79 = 0.31	F_1,79 = 1.58	F_1,79 = 34.04	F_1,79 = 0.13	F_1,79 = 0.09
	Range of motion	p < 0.001	p = 0.581	p = 0.213	p < 0.001	p = 0.719	p = 0.765
	Average angle	F_1,79 = 0.53	F_1,79 = 6.34	F_1,79 = 0.61	F_1,79 = 26.55	F_1,79 = 1.58	F_1,79 = 0.28
	Average angle	p = 0.470	p = 0.014	p = 0.437	p < 0.001	p = 0.212	p = 0.602
Trunk flexion	Range of motion	F_1,79 = 13.92	F_1,79 = 0.10	F_1,79 < 0.01	F_1,78 = 33.97	F_1,78 = 0.03	F_1,78 = 0.02
	Range of motion	p < 0.001	p = 0.753	p = 0.953	p < 0.001	p = 0.872	p = 0.878
	Average angle	F_1,79 = 53.25	F_1,79 = 0.24	F_1,79 = 1.61	F_1,78 = 42.78	F_1,78 = 1.18	F_1,78 = 0.38
	Average angle	p < 0.001	p = 0.627	p = 0.208	p < 0.001	p = 0.281	p = 0.539

F and p values are presented for each two-way ANOVA (Sex [between subjects: women vs men] × Fatigue [repeated measures: Non-Fatigue vs Fatigue Terminal]). Itatic fonts present statistically significant effects (p<0.05)
HT humerothoracic

Back to article page

ISSN: 2042-6410

Contact us

Submission enquiries: Access here and click Contact Us
General enquiries: info@biomedcentral.com